Literature DB >> 15796944

Finding the best abdominal closure: an evidence-based review of the literature.

Adil Ceydeli1, James Rucinski, Leslie Wise.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Despite advances in surgical technique and materials, abdominal fascial closure has remained a procedure that often reflects a surgeon's personal preference with a reliance on tradition and anecdotal experience. The value of a particular abdominal fascial closure technique may be measured by the incidence of early and late wound complications, and the best abdominal closure technique should be fast, easy, and cost-effective, while preventing both early and late complications. This study addresses the closure of the vertical midline laparotomy incision. DATA SOURCES: A MEDLINE (National Library of Medicine, Bethesda, Maryland) search was performed. All articles related to abdominal fascia closure published from 1966 to 2003 were included in the review.
CONCLUSIONS: Careful analysis of the current surgical literature, including 4 recently published meta-analyses, indicates that a consistent conclusion can be made regarding an optimal technique. That technique involves mass closure, incorporating all of the layers of the abdominal wall (except skin) as 1 structure, in a simple running technique, using #1 or #2 absorbable monofilament suture material with a suture length to wound length ratio of 4 to 1.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2005        PMID: 15796944     DOI: 10.1016/j.cursur.2004.08.014

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Curr Surg        ISSN: 0149-7944


  26 in total

1.  Risk factors for wound complications in midline abdominal incisions related to the size of stitches.

Authors:  D Millbourn; Y Cengiz; L A Israelsson
Journal:  Hernia       Date:  2011-01-30       Impact factor: 4.739

2.  Mass Continuous Suture versus Layered Interrupted Suture in Transverse Abdominal Incision Closure after Liver Resection.

Authors:  Jing Zhang; Hong-Ke Zhang; Hao-Yang Zhu; Jian-Wen Lu; Qiang Lu; Yi-Fan Ren; Chang Liu; Jian Dong; Zhao-Qing Du; Xue-Min Liu; Zheng Wu; Yi Lv; Xu-Feng Zhang
Journal:  World J Surg       Date:  2016-09       Impact factor: 3.352

3.  A prospective evaluation of the risk factors for development of wound dehiscence and incisional hernia.

Authors:  Kerim Bora Yılmaz; Melih Akıncı; Lütfi Doğan; Niyazi Karaman; Cihangir Özaslan; Can Atalay
Journal:  Ulus Cerrahi Derg       Date:  2013-03-01

4.  A retrospective analysis of early and late term complications in patients who underwent application of retention sutures for gastrointestinal tract malignancies.

Authors:  Barış Bayraktar; İbrahim Ali Özemir; Julide Sağıroğlu; Gökhan Demiral; Yahya Çelik; Sinan Aslan; Ercüment Tombalak; Ahmet Yılmaz; Rafet Yiğitbaşı
Journal:  Ulus Cerrahi Derg       Date:  2014-10-20

5.  A New Method for Surgical Abdominal Mass Closure After Abdominal Fascial Dehiscence Using Nasogastric Tube and Hemovac Perforator: A Case-Series Study.

Authors:  Jalal Vahedian; Sepideh Jahanian; Behrouz Banivaheb; Nima Hemmati; Mehrnaz Ghavamipour; Majid Chegini; Mahdi Alemrajabi
Journal:  World J Surg       Date:  2018-10       Impact factor: 3.352

6.  Suture to wound length ratio in abdominal wall closure: how well are we doing?

Authors:  Z F Williams; P Tenzel; W B Hooks; W W Hope
Journal:  Hernia       Date:  2017-09-23       Impact factor: 4.739

7.  Abdominal wall closure: resident education and human error.

Authors:  W W Hope; L I Watson; R Menon; C A Kotwall; T V Clancy
Journal:  Hernia       Date:  2010-06-11       Impact factor: 4.739

8.  Suture choice to reduce occurrence of surgical site infection, hernia, wound dehiscence and sinus/fistula: a network meta-analysis.

Authors:  B E Zucker; C Simillis; P Tekkis; C Kontovounisios
Journal:  Ann R Coll Surg Engl       Date:  2018-10-05       Impact factor: 1.891

Review 9.  Activity restrictions after gynecologic surgery: is there evidence?

Authors:  Ingrid E Nygaard; Nadia M Hamad; Janet M Shaw
Journal:  Int Urogynecol J       Date:  2013-01-23       Impact factor: 2.894

10.  A Prospective Randomized Study Comparing Non-absorbable Polypropylene (Prolene®) and Delayed Absorbable Polyglactin 910 (Vicryl®) Suture Material in Mass Closure of Vertical Laparotomy Wounds.

Authors:  Sharad Pandey; Mohinder Singh; Kuldip Singh; Sartaj Sandhu
Journal:  Indian J Surg       Date:  2012-04-19       Impact factor: 0.656

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.