| Literature DB >> 15796675 |
Catherine Ligneau-Hervé1, Etienne Mullet.
Abstract
Perspective-taking judgments among young adults, middle-aged, and elderly people were examined. In 1 condition, participants were instructed to judge the likelihood of acceptance of a painkiller as a function of 3 cues: severity of the condition, potential side effects, and level of trust in the health care provider. In the other condition, participants were instructed to judge the likelihood of purchasing pieces of clothing. Judgments were given from 2 viewpoints: the viewpoint of another person known to place no importance on one of the 3 cues, and the viewpoint of another person known to place very great importance on this cue. The hypotheses were that elderly people would not, to the same extent as young adults, be likely to discount the impact of the "no-importance" cue, and to magnify the impact of the "very important" cue. In both judgment situations, the results support these hypotheses. (c) 2005 APA, all rights reservedEntities:
Mesh:
Year: 2005 PMID: 15796675 DOI: 10.1037/1076-898X.11.1.53
Source DB: PubMed Journal: J Exp Psychol Appl ISSN: 1076-898X