Literature DB >> 15796666

Power and the creation of patronizing environments: the stereotype-based behaviors of the powerful and their effects on female performance in masculine domains.

Theresa K Vescio1, Sarah J Gervais, Mark Snyder, Ann Hoover.   

Abstract

This work tested the following hypothesis: When powerful men stereotype their female subordinates in masculine domains, they behave in patronizing ways that affect the performance of their subordinates. Experiment 1 examined the stereotyping tendencies and patronizing behaviors of the powerful. Findings revealed that powerful men who stereotyped their female subordinates (i.e., those who were weakness focused) gave female subordinates few valued resources but much praise. In Experiment 2, low-power participants received resources (valued or devalued positions) and praise (high or low) from a powerful man. Subordinates who were assigned to a devalued position but received high praise (i.e., the patronizing behavior mirrored from Experiment 1) were angry. However, men performed better in the anger-inspiring situation, whereas women performed worse. Copyright 2005 APA.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2005        PMID: 15796666     DOI: 10.1037/0022-3514.88.4.658

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Pers Soc Psychol        ISSN: 0022-3514


  7 in total

1.  Analysis of National Institutes of Health R01 Application Critiques, Impact, and Criteria Scores: Does the Sex of the Principal Investigator Make a Difference?

Authors:  Anna Kaatz; You-Geon Lee; Aaron Potvien; Wairimu Magua; Amarette Filut; Anupama Bhattacharya; Renee Leatherberry; Xiaojin Zhu; Molly Carnes
Journal:  Acad Med       Date:  2016-08       Impact factor: 6.893

2.  Are Female Applicants Disadvantaged in National Institutes of Health Peer Review? Combining Algorithmic Text Mining and Qualitative Methods to Detect Evaluative Differences in R01 Reviewers' Critiques.

Authors:  Wairimu Magua; Xiaojin Zhu; Anupama Bhattacharya; Amarette Filut; Aaron Potvien; Renee Leatherberry; You-Geon Lee; Madeline Jens; Dastagiri Malikireddy; Molly Carnes; Anna Kaatz
Journal:  J Womens Health (Larchmt)       Date:  2017-03-10       Impact factor: 2.681

3.  Stereotyping in the digital age: Male language is "ingenious", female language is "beautiful" - and popular.

Authors:  Tabea Meier; Ryan L Boyd; Matthias R Mehl; Anne Milek; James W Pennebaker; Mike Martin; Markus Wolf; Andrea B Horn
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2020-12-16       Impact factor: 3.240

4.  Gender differences in delayed-type hypersensitivity response: effects of stress and coping in first-year law students.

Authors:  Sarah McQueary Flynn; Lindsey J Schipper; Abbey R Roach; Suzanne C Segerstrom
Journal:  Brain Behav Immun       Date:  2009-01-04       Impact factor: 7.217

5.  Self-distancing improves interpersonal perceptions and behavior by decreasing medial prefrontal cortex activity during the provision of criticism.

Authors:  Jordan B Leitner; Ozlem Ayduk; Rodolfo Mendoza-Denton; Adam Magerman; Rachel Amey; Ethan Kross; Chad E Forbes
Journal:  Soc Cogn Affect Neurosci       Date:  2017-04-01       Impact factor: 3.436

Review 6.  Gender inequalities in the workplace: the effects of organizational structures, processes, practices, and decision makers' sexism.

Authors:  Cailin S Stamarski; Leanne S Son Hing
Journal:  Front Psychol       Date:  2015-09-16

7.  Silence is golden: effect of encouragement in motivating the weak link in an online exercise video game.

Authors:  Brandon C Irwin; Deborah L Feltz; Norbert L Kerr
Journal:  J Med Internet Res       Date:  2013-06-04       Impact factor: 5.428

  7 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.