Literature DB >> 15793136

Photodynamic effects of novel XF porphyrin derivatives on prokaryotic and eukaryotic cells.

T Maisch1, C Bosl, R-M Szeimies, N Lehn, C Abels.   

Abstract

The worldwide rise in the rates of antibiotic resistance of bacteria underlines the need for alternative antibacterial agents. A promising approach to the killing of gram-positive antibiotic-resistant bacteria of the skin uses light in combination with a photosensitizer to induce a phototoxic reaction. Different concentrations (0 to 100 microM) of porphyrin-based photosensitizers (CTP1, XF70, and XF73) and different incubation times (5 min, 1 h, and 4 h) were used to determine phototoxicity against two methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus strains, one methicillin-sensitive S. aureus strain, one methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus epidermidis strain, one Escherichia coli strain, and human keratinocytes and fibroblasts. Incubation with 0.005 microM XF70 or XF73, followed by illumination, yielded a 3-log10 (> or = 99.9%) decrease in the viable cell numbers of all staphylococcal strains, indicating that the XF drugs have high degrees of potency against gram-positive bacteria and also that the activities of these novel drugs are independent of the antibiotic resistance pattern of the staphylococci examined. CTP1 was less potent against the staphylococci under the same conditions. At 0.005 microM, XF70 and XF73 demonstrated no toxicity toward fibroblasts or keratinocytes. No inactivation of E. coli was detected at this concentration. XF73 was confirmed to act via a reactive oxygen species from the results of studies with sodium azide (a quencher of singlet oxygen), which reduced the killing of both eukaryotic and prokaryotic cells. When a quencher of superoxide anion and the hydroxyl radical was used, cell killing was not inhibited. These results demonstrate that the porphyrin-based photosensitizers had concentration-dependent differences in their efficacies of killing of methicillin-resistant staphylococcal strains via reactive oxygen species without harming eukaryotic cells at the same concentrations.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2005        PMID: 15793136      PMCID: PMC1068608          DOI: 10.1128/AAC.49.4.1542-1552.2005

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Antimicrob Agents Chemother        ISSN: 0066-4804            Impact factor:   5.191


  65 in total

Review 1.  Bactericidal effects of photoactivated porphyrins--an alternative approach to antimicrobial drugs.

Authors:  Z Malik; J Hanania; Y Nitzan
Journal:  J Photochem Photobiol B       Date:  1990-05       Impact factor: 6.252

2.  Fluorescent cationic probes of mitochondria. Metrics and mechanism of interaction.

Authors:  J R Bunting; T V Phan; E Kamali; R M Dowben
Journal:  Biophys J       Date:  1989-11       Impact factor: 4.033

Review 3.  Fluorescence labeling and microscopy of DNA.

Authors:  D J Arndt-Jovin; T M Jovin
Journal:  Methods Cell Biol       Date:  1989       Impact factor: 1.441

4.  Protein A and coagulase expression in epidemic and non-epidemic Staphylococcus aureus.

Authors:  J I Roberts; M A Gaston
Journal:  J Clin Pathol       Date:  1987-08       Impact factor: 3.411

5.  Mitochondrial membrane potential in living cells: evidence from studies with rhodamine 6 G as fluorescent probe.

Authors:  K Dietzmann; G Letko; A Sokolowski
Journal:  Exp Pathol       Date:  1987

6.  Pure exogenous singlet oxygen: nonmutagenicity in bacteria.

Authors:  T A Dahl; W R Midden; P E Hartman
Journal:  Mutat Res       Date:  1988-09       Impact factor: 2.433

Review 7.  Optimal treatment of complicated skin and skin structure infections.

Authors:  R L Nichols
Journal:  J Antimicrob Chemother       Date:  1999-09       Impact factor: 5.790

8.  Photodynamic action of methylene blue: repair and mutation in Escherichia coli.

Authors:  S Menezes; M A Capella; L R Caldas
Journal:  J Photochem Photobiol B       Date:  1990-05       Impact factor: 6.252

9.  Comparison of killing of gram-negative and gram-positive bacteria by pure singlet oxygen.

Authors:  T A Dahl; W R Midden; P E Hartman
Journal:  J Bacteriol       Date:  1989-04       Impact factor: 3.490

10.  Photosensitization, uptake, and retention of phenoxazine Nile blue derivatives in human bladder carcinoma cells.

Authors:  C W Lin; J R Shulok; Y K Wong; C F Schanbacher; L Cincotta; J W Foley
Journal:  Cancer Res       Date:  1991-02-15       Impact factor: 12.701

View more
  58 in total

1.  Antimicrobial photodynamic therapy combined with conventional endodontic treatment to eliminate root canal biofilm infection.

Authors:  Aguinaldo S Garcez; Martha S Ribeiro; George P Tegos; Silvia C Núñez; Antonio O C Jorge; Michael R Hamblin
Journal:  Lasers Surg Med       Date:  2007-01       Impact factor: 4.025

2.  Phenothiazinium antimicrobial photosensitizers are substrates of bacterial multidrug resistance pumps.

Authors:  George P Tegos; Michael R Hamblin
Journal:  Antimicrob Agents Chemother       Date:  2006-01       Impact factor: 5.191

3.  Antimicrobial effects of photodynamic therapy on patients with necrotic pulps and periapical lesion.

Authors:  Aguinaldo Silva Garcez; Silvia Cristina Nuñez; Michael R Hamblin; Martha Simões Ribeiro
Journal:  J Endod       Date:  2007-12-21       Impact factor: 4.171

4.  Microbial growth inhibition by alternating electric fields.

Authors:  Moshe Giladi; Yaara Porat; Alexandra Blatt; Yoram Wasserman; Eilon D Kirson; Erez Dekel; Yoram Palti
Journal:  Antimicrob Agents Chemother       Date:  2008-07-28       Impact factor: 5.191

Review 5.  Topical antimicrobials for burn infections - an update.

Authors:  Mert Sevgi; Ani Toklu; Daniela Vecchio; Michael R Hamblin
Journal:  Recent Pat Antiinfect Drug Discov       Date:  2013-12

Review 6.  Antibiotics in the clinical pipeline at the end of 2015.

Authors:  Mark S Butler; Mark At Blaskovich; Matthew A Cooper
Journal:  J Antibiot (Tokyo)       Date:  2016-06-29       Impact factor: 2.649

7.  Progressive cationic functionalization of chlorin derivatives for antimicrobial photodynamic inactivation and related vancomycin conjugates.

Authors:  Liyi Huang; Min Wang; Ying-Ying Huang; Ahmed El-Hussein; Lawrence M Wolf; Long Y Chiang; Michael R Hamblin
Journal:  Photochem Photobiol Sci       Date:  2018-05-16       Impact factor: 3.982

8.  Study of photodynamic therapy in the control of isolated microorganisms from infected wounds--an in vitro study.

Authors:  Denise Pereira de Lima Carvalho; Juliana Guerra Pinto; Camila Di Paula Costa Sorge; Fabiana Regis Rodrigues Benedito; Sonia Khouri; Juliana Ferreira Strixino
Journal:  Lasers Med Sci       Date:  2013-03-01       Impact factor: 3.161

9.  Photodynamic Therapy for Cancer and for Infections: What Is the Difference?

Authors:  Sulbha K Sharma; Pawel Mroz; Tianhong Dai; Ying-Ying Huang; Tyler G St Denis; Michael R Hamblin
Journal:  Isr J Chem       Date:  2012-09       Impact factor: 3.333

Review 10.  Phage therapy and photodynamic therapy: low environmental impact approaches to inactivate microorganisms in fish farming plants.

Authors:  Adelaide Almeida; Angela Cunha; Newton C M Gomes; Eliana Alves; Liliana Costa; Maria A F Faustino
Journal:  Mar Drugs       Date:  2009-07-30       Impact factor: 5.118

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.