OBJECTIVE: This study investigated intra-hemispheric and inter-hemispheric EEG coherences as a function of age in boys with different subtypes of Attention Deficit/Hyperactivity Disorder (AD/HD), in comparison with a control group of normal boys. METHODS: Three groups of 40 children (AD/HD combined type, AD/HD inattentive type, and normal controls) participated. Each group contained 8 males in each 1 year band from 8 to 12 years. EEG was recorded from 21 sites during an eyes-closed resting condition. Wave-shape coherence was calculated for 8 intra-hemispheric electrode pairs (4 in each hemisphere), and 8 inter-hemispheric electrode pairs, within each of the delta, theta, alpha and beta bands. RESULTS: Developmental effects in intra-hemispheric coherences at shorter and longer inter-electrode distances generally supported Thatcher's two-compartment model. Control boys showed evidence of development in longer-range inter-hemispheric coherences which was not apparent in AD/HD boys. Boys with AD/HD of the combined type showed qualitatively different anomalies than boys with AD/HD of the inattentive type. CONCLUSIONS: EEG coherences in normal boys of this age range develop systematically with age in a non-linear fashion. Boys with AD/HD do not show this development. They display coherence anomalies which differ in nature between DSM-IV subtypes, suggesting differences which are not relatable to simple symptom severity. SIGNIFICANCE: The data reported here indicate differences in the development of EEG coherences in boys with AD/HD, and point to differences between the AD/HD subtypes which may help understanding of the disorder.
OBJECTIVE: This study investigated intra-hemispheric and inter-hemispheric EEG coherences as a function of age in boys with different subtypes of Attention Deficit/Hyperactivity Disorder (AD/HD), in comparison with a control group of normal boys. METHODS: Three groups of 40 children (AD/HD combined type, AD/HD inattentive type, and normal controls) participated. Each group contained 8 males in each 1 year band from 8 to 12 years. EEG was recorded from 21 sites during an eyes-closed resting condition. Wave-shape coherence was calculated for 8 intra-hemispheric electrode pairs (4 in each hemisphere), and 8 inter-hemispheric electrode pairs, within each of the delta, theta, alpha and beta bands. RESULTS: Developmental effects in intra-hemispheric coherences at shorter and longer inter-electrode distances generally supported Thatcher's two-compartment model. Control boys showed evidence of development in longer-range inter-hemispheric coherences which was not apparent in AD/HDboys. Boys with AD/HD of the combined type showed qualitatively different anomalies than boys with AD/HD of the inattentive type. CONCLUSIONS: EEG coherences in normal boys of this age range develop systematically with age in a non-linear fashion. Boys with AD/HD do not show this development. They display coherence anomalies which differ in nature between DSM-IV subtypes, suggesting differences which are not relatable to simple symptom severity. SIGNIFICANCE: The data reported here indicate differences in the development of EEG coherences in boys with AD/HD, and point to differences between the AD/HD subtypes which may help understanding of the disorder.
Authors: Stefan J Teipel; Oliver Pogarell; Thomas Meindl; Olaf Dietrich; Djyldyz Sydykova; Ulrike Hunklinger; Bea Georgii; Christoph Mulert; Maximilian F Reiser; Hans-Jürgen Möller; Harald Hampel Journal: Hum Brain Mapp Date: 2009-07 Impact factor: 5.038
Authors: Vivienne A Russell; Robert D Oades; Rosemary Tannock; Peter R Killeen; Judith G Auerbach; Espen B Johansen; Terje Sagvolden Journal: Behav Brain Funct Date: 2006-08-23 Impact factor: 3.759
Authors: Paul E Rapp; David O Keyser; Alfonso Albano; Rene Hernandez; Douglas B Gibson; Robert A Zambon; W David Hairston; John D Hughes; Andrew Krystal; Andrew S Nichols Journal: Front Hum Neurosci Date: 2015-02-04 Impact factor: 3.169
Authors: Paul E Rapp; Christopher J Cellucci; David O Keyser; Adele M K Gilpin; David M Darmon Journal: Front Neurol Date: 2013-11-19 Impact factor: 4.003
Authors: Halla Helgadóttir; Ólafur Ó Gudmundsson; Gísli Baldursson; Páll Magnússon; Nicolas Blin; Berglind Brynjólfsdóttir; Ásdís Emilsdóttir; Gudrún B Gudmundsdóttir; Málfrídur Lorange; Paula K Newman; Gísli H Jóhannesson; Kristinn Johnsen Journal: BMJ Open Date: 2015-01-16 Impact factor: 2.692
Authors: Jacquelyn L Meyers; Jian Zhang; David B Chorlian; Ashwini K Pandey; Chella Kamarajan; Jen-Chyong Wang; Leah Wetherill; Dongbing Lai; Michael Chao; Grace Chan; Sivan Kinreich; Manav Kapoor; Sarah Bertelsen; Jeanette McClintick; Lance Bauer; Victor Hesselbrock; Samuel Kuperman; John Kramer; Jessica E Salvatore; Danielle M Dick; Arpana Agrawal; Tatiana Foroud; Howard J Edenberg; Alison Goate; Bernice Porjesz Journal: Mol Psychiatry Date: 2020-05-20 Impact factor: 15.992
Authors: Jacquelyn L Meyers; David B Chorlian; Emma C Johnson; Ashwini K Pandey; Chella Kamarajan; Jessica E Salvatore; Fazil Aliev; Stacey Subbie-Saenz de Viteri; Jian Zhang; Michael Chao; Manav Kapoor; Victor Hesselbrock; John Kramer; Samuel Kuperman; John Nurnberger; Jay Tischfield; Alison Goate; Tatiana Foroud; Danielle M Dick; Howard J Edenberg; Arpana Agrawal; Bernice Porjesz Journal: Brain Sci Date: 2019-10-17