Literature DB >> 15792395

Interpretation of absorption rate data for inhaled fluticasone propionate obtained in compartmental pharmacokinetic modeling.

S Krishnaswami1, G Hochhaus, H Möllmann, J Barth, H Derendorf.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: Reports characterizing the pharmacokinetics of inhaled fluticasone propionate (FP) using compartmental approaches have suggested that the absorption of FP into the systemic circulation is rapid with a half-life of approximately 10 min. We believe that this is a classical case of misassignment of the pharmacokinetic parameter estimates, a problem often encountered while modeling pharmacokinetic data. The objective of this study was to illustrate and analyze this problem using actual blood level data of FP obtained in 14 healthy subjects.
MATERIALS AND METHODS: Serum concentration-time data of FP were obtained from a double-blind, randomized study involving single and multiple twice-daily inhalations of 500 microg via a dry powder device, Diskus. The profiles were fitted using one- and two-compartment pharmacokinetic models with first order absorption. Various permutations of the resulting exponential rate constants were analyzed to determine the combination that was most consistent with the underlying physical process.
RESULTS: The two-compartment body model with first order absorption gave excellent fits for the observed FP concentrations after both single and multiple dosing. Even though peak levels were reached relatively early (30 - 90 min) after inhalation, the combination that most appropriately described the underlying process was alpha > Ka > beta, i.e. slow absorption, rapid distribution and slower elimination kinetics. The absorption, distribution and elimination half-lives resulted to be 3.8 h, 9.9 min and 13.6 h, respectively, consistent with the high lipophilicity and sustained dissolution characteristics observed in vitro.
CONCLUSIONS: Analysis of FP pharmacokinetics after inhalation represents a classical case of potential misassignment of the exponential rate constants, which if ignored, could lead to erroneous interpretations regarding the underlying process. The study also elucidates the pitfall of using t(max) to calculate absorption rate.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2005        PMID: 15792395     DOI: 10.5414/cpp43117

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Int J Clin Pharmacol Ther        ISSN: 0946-1965            Impact factor:   1.366


  8 in total

Review 1.  Pharmacometric Models for Characterizing the Pharmacokinetics of Orally Inhaled Drugs.

Authors:  Jens Markus Borghardt; Benjamin Weber; Alexander Staab; Charlotte Kloft
Journal:  AAPS J       Date:  2015-04-07       Impact factor: 4.009

2.  In Vivo-Relevant Transwell Dish-Based Dissolution Testing for Orally Inhaled Corticosteroid Products.

Authors:  Masahiro Sakagami; Hua Li; Jügen Venitz
Journal:  Pharm Res       Date:  2019-05-09       Impact factor: 4.200

3.  A pharmacokinetic simulation tool for inhaled corticosteroids.

Authors:  Benjamin Weber; Guenther Hochhaus
Journal:  AAPS J       Date:  2012-11-10       Impact factor: 4.009

Review 4.  Assessment of the predictive capability of modelling and simulation to determine bioequivalence of inhaled drugs: A systematic review.

Authors:  Juliet Rebello; Bill Brashier; Sharvari Shukla
Journal:  Daru       Date:  2022-01-30       Impact factor: 4.088

5.  Model-based evaluation of pulmonary pharmacokinetics in asthmatic and COPD patients after oral olodaterol inhalation.

Authors:  Jens Markus Borghardt; Benjamin Weber; Alexander Staab; Christina Kunz; Charlotte Kloft
Journal:  Br J Clin Pharmacol       Date:  2016-06-23       Impact factor: 4.335

6.  Fluticasone furoate, a novel inhaled corticosteroid, demonstrates prolonged lung absorption kinetics in man compared with inhaled fluticasone propionate.

Authors:  Ann Allen; Philippe J Bareille; Vicki M Rousell
Journal:  Clin Pharmacokinet       Date:  2013-01       Impact factor: 6.447

7.  Towards a Quantitative Mechanistic Understanding of Localized Pulmonary Tissue Retention-A Combined In Vivo/In Silico Approach Based on Four Model Drugs.

Authors:  Anneke Himstedt; Clemens Braun; Sebastian Georg Wicha; Jens Markus Borghardt
Journal:  Pharmaceutics       Date:  2020-04-29       Impact factor: 6.321

8.  Inferring pulmonary exposure based on clinical PK data: accuracy and precision of model-based deconvolution methods.

Authors:  Anneke Himstedt; Jens Markus Borghardt; Sebastian Georg Wicha
Journal:  J Pharmacokinet Pharmacodyn       Date:  2021-09-28       Impact factor: 2.745

  8 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.