Literature DB >> 15792278

A comparison of response rate and time according to the survey methods used: a randomized controlled trial.

Sang-Wook Yi1, Jae Seok Hong, Heechoul Ohrr, Jee Jeon Yi.   

Abstract

The purpose of this study was to evaluate the effects of recorded and standard deliveries, and stamped and franked return envelops in a postal survey of Korean-Vietnam veterans. Nine hundred veterans were randomly divided into four subgroups. A randomized controlled trial was conducted for two mailing strategies. The 52 study subjects to whom mail was undeliverable and 36 additional study subjects found not to be residing at the listed addresses were excluded from the study. The 699 (86%) surveys were returned within 39 business days after the first mailing. The response rate for the recorded delivery (88%) was significantly higher than that of the standard delivery (82%)(p = 0.03), and the response rate of the stamped return envelops (88%) was higher than that of the franked return envelops (85%)(p = 0.27). The replies for the recorded and standard deliveries arrived an average of 10.2 and 9.9 business days, respectively, after the first mailing (p = 0.60). The average times of the responses for the stamped and franked return envelops were 9.8 and 10.4 business days, respectively (p = 0.25). Recorded deliveries significantly increased the response rate compared to standard deliveries, and stamped return envelops slightly increased the response rate a little compared to franked return envelops. The timing of response of recorded deliveries was similar to that of standard deliveries but the volume of response of recorded deliveries was higher than that of standard deliveries.

Mesh:

Year:  2005        PMID: 15792278     DOI: 10.1007/s10654-004-5098-6

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Eur J Epidemiol        ISSN: 0393-2990            Impact factor:   8.082


  9 in total

1.  Increasing response rates for mailed surveys of Medicaid clients and other low-income populations.

Authors:  P J Gibson; T D Koepsell; P Diehr; C Hale
Journal:  Am J Epidemiol       Date:  1999-06-01       Impact factor: 4.897

2.  A randomized trial of the impact of certified mail on response rate to a physician survey, and a cost-effectiveness analysis.

Authors:  M L Del Valle; H Morgenstern; T L Rogstad; C Albright; B G Vickrey
Journal:  Eval Health Prof       Date:  1997-12       Impact factor: 2.651

3.  Ethnicity, but not cancer family history, is related to response to a population-based mailed questionnaire.

Authors:  Cristina Mancuso; Gord Glendon; Lynn Anson-Cartwright; Ellen Juqing Shi; Irene Andrulis; Julia Knight
Journal:  Ann Epidemiol       Date:  2004-01       Impact factor: 3.797

4.  Post-traumatic stress disorder and chronic fatigue syndrome-like illness among Gulf War veterans: a population-based survey of 30,000 veterans.

Authors:  Han K Kang; Benjamin H Natelson; Clare M Mahan; Kyung Y Lee; Frances M Murphy
Journal:  Am J Epidemiol       Date:  2003-01-15       Impact factor: 4.897

5.  Do postage-stamps increase response rates to postal surveys? A randomized controlled trial.

Authors:  R A Harrison; D Holt; P J Elton
Journal:  Int J Epidemiol       Date:  2002-08       Impact factor: 7.196

6.  Health survey methods with minority populations: some lessons from recent experience.

Authors:  S A McGraw; J B McKinlay; S A Crawford; L A Costa; D L Cohen
Journal:  Ethn Dis       Date:  1992       Impact factor: 1.847

7.  Effectiveness of various mailing strategies among nonrespondents in a prospective cohort study.

Authors:  E B Rimm; M J Stampfer; G A Colditz; E Giovannucci; W C Willett
Journal:  Am J Epidemiol       Date:  1990-06       Impact factor: 4.897

8.  Different response rates in a trial of two envelop styles in mail survey research.

Authors:  D A Asch; N A Christakis
Journal:  Epidemiology       Date:  1994-05       Impact factor: 4.822

9.  Prevalence and disease experience rates in Korean physicians.

Authors:  J J Kim; S D Kim; K H Meng; Y O Ahn; Y T Yum; H C Oh; D B Lee; S I Lee; B Y Chun; J S Choi
Journal:  J Korean Med Sci       Date:  1998-06       Impact factor: 2.153

  9 in total
  1 in total

Review 1.  Methods to increase response to postal and electronic questionnaires.

Authors:  Philip James Edwards; Ian Roberts; Mike J Clarke; Carolyn Diguiseppi; Reinhard Wentz; Irene Kwan; Rachel Cooper; Lambert M Felix; Sarah Pratap
Journal:  Cochrane Database Syst Rev       Date:  2009-07-08
  1 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.