Literature DB >> 15791678

Tobacco industry price-subsidizing promotions may overcome the downward pressure of higher prices on initiation of regular smoking.

John P Pierce1, Todd P Gilmer, Lora Lee, Elizabeth A Gilpin, Joy de Beyer, Karen Messer.   

Abstract

Real cigarette prices in the US increased from the early 1980s to early 1990s. Holding all else equal, adolescent initiation of regular smoking should have declined during this period. Using national population-based surveys (n = 336 343) conducted in the 1990s, we present trends (early 1960s to mid-1990s) in the initiation of regular smoking among 14-17-year-old adolescents and 18-21-year-old young adults. We also present trends in consumer-price-index-adjusted cigarette price and tobacco-industry expenditures for price-subsidizing promotions. We relate price and price-subsidizing tobacco industry expenditures to trends in initiation in the two age groups, using autoregressive integrated moving average models (ARIMA). From the model results, we conclude that price-subsidizing promotions may provide the tobacco industry with an effective way to segment the market. That is, they effectively offer lower prices to population subgroups that are more price-sensitive (e.g. young smokers not yet addicted), countering the depressing effect of general price increases on smoking. Thus, we find that the relationship of cigarette price to smoking behavior is more complex than previously described. Copyright (c) 2005 John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2005        PMID: 15791678     DOI: 10.1002/hec.990

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Health Econ        ISSN: 1057-9230            Impact factor:   3.046


  15 in total

1.  The association of retail promotions for cigarettes with the Master Settlement Agreement, tobacco control programmes and cigarette excise taxes.

Authors:  Brett R Loomis; Matthew C Farrelly; Nathan H Mann
Journal:  Tob Control       Date:  2006-12       Impact factor: 7.552

2.  Changes in Youth Smoking, 1976-2002: A Time-Series Analysis.

Authors:  Fred C Pampel; Jade Aguilar
Journal:  Youth Soc       Date:  2008

3.  Banning tobacco price promotions, smoking-related beliefs and behaviour: findings from the International Tobacco Control Four Country (ITC 4C) Survey.

Authors:  Sherine El-Toukhy; Kelvin Choi; Sara C Hitchman; Maansi Bansal-Travers; James F Thrasher; Hua-Hie Yong; Richard J O'Connor; Ce Shang
Journal:  Tob Control       Date:  2017-07-12       Impact factor: 7.552

4.  Reducing tobacco use and access through strengthened minimum price laws.

Authors:  Ian McLaughlin; Anne Pearson; Elisa Laird-Metke; Kurt Ribisl
Journal:  Am J Public Health       Date:  2014-08-14       Impact factor: 9.308

5.  The relation between tobacco taxes and youth and young adult smoking: what happened following the 2009 U.S. federal tax increase on cigarettes?

Authors:  Martijn van Hasselt; Judy Kruger; Beth Han; Ralph S Caraballo; Michael A Penne; Brett Loomis; Joseph C Gfroerer
Journal:  Addict Behav       Date:  2015-01-19       Impact factor: 3.913

6.  Tobacco Industry Promotions and Pricing After Tax Increases: An Analysis of Internal Industry Documents.

Authors:  Dorie E Apollonio; Stanton A Glantz
Journal:  Nicotine Tob Res       Date:  2020-05-26       Impact factor: 4.244

7.  Changes in age trajectories of smoking experimentation during the California Tobacco Control Program.

Authors:  Karen Messer; John P Pierce
Journal:  Am J Public Health       Date:  2009-11-17       Impact factor: 9.308

8.  Stealing a march in the 21st century: accelerating progress in the 100-year war against tobacco addiction in the United States.

Authors:  Michael C Fiore; Timothy B Baker
Journal:  Am J Public Health       Date:  2009-05-14       Impact factor: 9.308

9.  Tobacco marketing in California and implications for the future.

Authors:  April Roeseler; Ellen C Feighery; Tess Boley Cruz
Journal:  Tob Control       Date:  2010-04       Impact factor: 7.552

10.  Smoking among construction workers: the nonlinear influence of the economy, cigarette prices, and antismoking sentiment.

Authors:  Cassandra Okechukwu; Janine Bacic; Kai-Wen Cheng; Ralph Catalano
Journal:  Soc Sci Med       Date:  2012-07-02       Impact factor: 4.634

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.