A H Chakera1, E Friis, U Hesse, N Al-Suliman, B Zerahn, B Hesse. 1. Department of Clinical Physiology and Nuclear Medicine, Rigshospitalet, Copenhagen University Hospital, Copenhagen, Denmark. hougaard_jensen@hotmail.com
Abstract
PURPOSE: The aim of this study was to analyse different factors of possible significance for non-visualisation of sentinel nodes (SNs) by preoperative lymphoscintigraphy, in order to enable improvement of the success rate of SN visualisation through modification or alteration of some of the factors. METHODS: Between March 1998 and January 2003 we analysed a series of 442 women with unilateral stage T1 and clinical N0 breast cancer. Lymphoscintigraphy was performed after periareolar or peritumoural injection of 99mTc-albumin nanocolloid, with image acquisition after 2-6 h or 18-24 h. Until January 2001, all patients received around 20 MBq tracer, irrespective of time to operation. From January 2001, patients injected on the day before surgery received at least 100 MBq while patients injected on the day of surgery received around 50 MBq. RESULTS: An SN was visualised in 87% of the patients, and at surgery the SN was detected with the hand-held gamma probe in 42% of the remaining patients. By multiple logistic regression analysis, statistically significant independent variables that increased the risk for non-visualisation were increasing age (p=0.0007), increasing body weight (p=0.0189) and peritumoural injection (p<0.0001). Significant interaction was found for imaging time and injected activity (p=0.0017). CONCLUSION: This study conclusively shows that the risk of unsuccessful SN imaging increases with age and body weight. Our findings suggest that the scintigraphic success rate may be improved by periareolar (rather than peritumoural) injection. Early and late imaging procedures are equally efficient, but if a late imaging procedure is used, activity (adjusted for physical decay) in the patient on day 2 should be more than 10 MBq.
PURPOSE: The aim of this study was to analyse different factors of possible significance for non-visualisation of sentinel nodes (SNs) by preoperative lymphoscintigraphy, in order to enable improvement of the success rate of SN visualisation through modification or alteration of some of the factors. METHODS: Between March 1998 and January 2003 we analysed a series of 442 women with unilateral stage T1 and clinical N0 breast cancer. Lymphoscintigraphy was performed after periareolar or peritumoural injection of 99mTc-albumin nanocolloid, with image acquisition after 2-6 h or 18-24 h. Until January 2001, all patients received around 20 MBq tracer, irrespective of time to operation. From January 2001, patients injected on the day before surgery received at least 100 MBq while patients injected on the day of surgery received around 50 MBq. RESULTS: An SN was visualised in 87% of the patients, and at surgery the SN was detected with the hand-held gamma probe in 42% of the remaining patients. By multiple logistic regression analysis, statistically significant independent variables that increased the risk for non-visualisation were increasing age (p=0.0007), increasing body weight (p=0.0189) and peritumoural injection (p<0.0001). Significant interaction was found for imaging time and injected activity (p=0.0017). CONCLUSION: This study conclusively shows that the risk of unsuccessful SN imaging increases with age and body weight. Our findings suggest that the scintigraphic success rate may be improved by periareolar (rather than peritumoural) injection. Early and late imaging procedures are equally efficient, but if a late imaging procedure is used, activity (adjusted for physical decay) in the patient on day 2 should be more than 10 MBq.
Authors: J J Mateos; S Vidal-Sicart; G Zanón; J Pahisa; D Fuster; F Martín; M Ortega; P Fernández; F Pons Journal: Nucl Med Commun Date: 2001-01 Impact factor: 1.690
Authors: P J Tanis; J W van Sandick; O E Nieweg; R A Valdés Olmos; E J T Rutgers; C A Hoefnagel; B B R Kroon Journal: Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging Date: 2002-03 Impact factor: 9.236
Authors: R A Valdés Olmos; P J Tanis; C A Hoefnagel; O E Nieweg; S H Muller; E J Rutgers; M L Kooi; B B Kroon Journal: Nucl Med Commun Date: 2001-05 Impact factor: 1.690
Authors: Charles E Cox; Elisabeth Dupont; George F Whitehead; Mark D Ebert; Keoni Nguyen; Eric S Peltz; Darian Peckham; Alan Cantor; Douglas S Reintgen Journal: Breast J Date: 2002 Mar-Apr Impact factor: 2.431
Authors: Roland Reitsamer; Florentia Peintinger; Lukas Rettenbacher; Eva Prokop; Felix Sedlmayer Journal: World J Surg Date: 2003-10-28 Impact factor: 3.352
Authors: C De Cicco; G Trifirò; M Intra; G Marotta; A Ciprian; A Frasson; G Prisco; A Luini; G Viale; G Paganelli Journal: Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging Date: 2003-11-29 Impact factor: 9.236
Authors: John Buscombe; Giovanni Paganelli; Zeynep E Burak; Wendy Waddington; Jean Maublant; Enrique Prats; Holger Palmedo; Orazio Schillaci; Lorenzo Maffioli; M Lassmann; Carlo Chiesa; Emilio Bombardieri; Arturo Chiti Journal: Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging Date: 2007-12 Impact factor: 9.236
Authors: Marieke E Straver; Philip Meijnen; Geertjan van Tienhoven; Cornelis J H van de Velde; Robert E Mansel; Jan Bogaerts; Nicole Duez; Luigi Cataliotti; Jean H G Klinkenbijl; Helen A Westenberg; Huub van der Mijle; Marko Snoj; Coen Hurkmans; Emiel J T Rutgers Journal: Ann Surg Oncol Date: 2010-03-19 Impact factor: 5.344
Authors: W Charles Conway; Mark B Faries; Michael B Nicholl; Alicia M Terando; Edwin C Glass; MyungShin Sim; Donald L Morton Journal: Ann Surg Oncol Date: 2009-03-11 Impact factor: 5.344
Authors: Iris M C van der Ploeg; Renato A Valdés Olmos; Bin B R Kroon; Emiel J T Rutgers; Omgo E Nieweg Journal: Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging Date: 2008-08-20 Impact factor: 9.236
Authors: Francesco Giammarile; Naomi Alazraki; John N Aarsvold; Riccardo A Audisio; Edwin Glass; Sandra F Grant; Jolanta Kunikowska; Marjut Leidenius; Valeria M Moncayo; Roger F Uren; Wim J G Oyen; Renato A Valdés Olmos; Sergi Vidal Sicart Journal: Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging Date: 2013-10-02 Impact factor: 9.236
Authors: A H Chakera; J Lock-Andersen; U Hesse; B M Nürnberg; B R Juhl; K H Stokholm; K T Drzewiecki; B Hesse Journal: Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging Date: 2009-01-20 Impact factor: 9.236