Literature DB >> 15791382

The Italian Group for LAP-BAND: predictive value of initial body mass index for weight loss after 5 years of follow-up.

L Angrisani1, N Di Lorenzo, F Favretti, F Furbetta, A Iuppa, S B Doldi, M Paganelli, N Basso, M Lucchese, M Zappa, G Lesti, F D Capizzi, C Giardiello, A Paganini, L Di Cosmo, A Veneziani, S Lacitignola, G Silecchia, M Alkilani, P Forestieri, F Puglisi, A Gardinazzi, M Toppino, F Campanile, B Marzano, P Bernante, G Perrotta, V Borrelli, M Lorenzo.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Laparoscopic of the LAP-BAND System placement stage of obesity is a safe operation, but its indication in terms of stage of obesity is controversial. The aim of this study was to evaluate the 5 years stage of obesity results for weight loss in patients with varying preoperative ranges of body mass index (BMI).
METHODS: Data were obtained from the Italian Collaborative Study Group for LAP-BAND System (GILB) registry. Detailed information was collected on a specifically created database (MS Access 2000) for patients operated on in Italy from January 1996 to 2003. Patients operated on between January 1996 and December 1997 were allocated to four groups according to preoperative BMI range: 30-39.9 kg/m(2) (group A), 40-49.9 kg/m(2) (group B), 50-59.9 kg/m(2) (group C), and =60 kg/m(2) (group D) percent estimated weight loss respectively. Postoperative complications, mortality, BMI, BMI loss, and (%EWL) were considered in each group. Data are expressed as mean +/- SD, except as otherwise indicated. Statistical analysis was done by means of Fisher's exact test, and p < 0.05 was considered significant.
RESULTS: After 5 years from LAP-BAND System surgery, 573 of 3,562 patients were eligible for the study. One hundred fifty-five of 573 (27.0%) were lost to follow-up, 24 of 418 (5.7%) underwent band removal due to complications (gastric pouch dilation, band erosion), eight of 418 (1.9%) were converted to other bariatric procedures, five of 418 (1.2%) died of causes not related to the operation or the band, and 381 of 573 (66.5%) were available for follow-up. Based on 96, 214, 64, and seven patients their preoperative BMI, Were allocated to groups A, B, C, and D, respectively. At time of follow-up mean BMI was 27.5 +/- 5.2 in group A, 31.6 +/- 4.7 in group B, 37.6 +/- 17.3 in group C, and 41.4 +/- 6.9 kg/m(2) in group D. Mean BMI loss was 9.8 +/- 5.4, 12.9 +/- 5.2, 15.8 +/- 8.1, and 23.2 +/- 4.9 kg/m(2), respectively, in groups A, B, C, and D. Mean %EWL at the same time was 54.6 +/- 32.3 in group A, 54.1 +/- 17.2 in group B, 51.6 +/- 35 in group C, and 59.l +/- 17.1 in group D.
CONCLUSION: Initial BMI in this series did not correlate with %EWL 5 years after the operation. In fact %EWL was almost the same in each group, independent of preoperative weight. Initial BMI was an accurate indicator of the results obtained 5 years after LAP-BAND in group C (50-59.9 kg/m(2)) and D (=60 kg/m(2)) patients, who remained morbidly obese despite their %EWL.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2004        PMID: 15791382     DOI: 10.1007/s00464-003-9149-y

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Surg Endosc        ISSN: 0930-2794            Impact factor:   4.584


  5 in total

1.  Pre-operative predictors of weight loss at 1-year after Lap-Band surgery.

Authors:  J B Dixon; M E Dixon; P E O'Brien
Journal:  Obes Surg       Date:  2001-04       Impact factor: 4.129

2.  Results of the Italian multicenter study on 239 super-obese patients treated by adjustable gastric banding.

Authors:  L Angrisani; F Furbetta; S B Doldi; N Basso; M Lucchese; M Giacomelli; M Zappa; L Di Cosmo; A Veneziani; G U Turicchia; M Alkilani; P Forestieri; G Lesti; F Puglisi; M Toppino; F Campanile; F D Capizzi; C D'Atri; L Scipioni; C Giardiello; N Di Lorenzo; S Lacitignola; M Belvederesi; B Marzano; P Bernante; A Iuppa; V Borrelli; M Lorenzo
Journal:  Obes Surg       Date:  2002-12       Impact factor: 4.129

3.  Lap Band adjustable gastric banding system: the Italian experience with 1863 patients operated on 6 years.

Authors:  L Angrisani; F Furbetta; S B Doldi; N Basso; M Lucchese; F Giacomelli; M Zappa; L Di Cosmo; A Veneziani; G U Turicchia; M Alkilani; P Forestieri; G Lesti; F Puglisi; M Toppino; F Campanile; F D Capizzi; C D'Atri; L Sciptoni; C Giardiello; N Di Lorenzo; S Lacitignola; N Belvederesi; B Marzano; P Bernate; A Iuppa; V Borrelli; M Lorenzo
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2002-12-04       Impact factor: 4.584

4.  Outcome predictors in morbidly obese recipients of an adjustable gastric band.

Authors:  Luca Busetto; Gianni Segato; Francesco De Marchi; Mirto Foletto; Maurizio De Luca; Dorina Caniato; Franco Favretti; Mario Lise; Giuliano Enzi
Journal:  Obes Surg       Date:  2002-02       Impact factor: 4.129

5.  Functional gastric bypass with an adjustable gastric band.

Authors:  Francesco Furbetta; Giancarlo Gambinotti
Journal:  Obes Surg       Date:  2002-12       Impact factor: 4.129

  5 in total
  16 in total

Review 1.  Preoperative predictors of weight loss following bariatric surgery: systematic review.

Authors:  Masha Livhits; Cheryl Mercado; Irina Yermilov; Janak A Parikh; Erik Dutson; Amir Mehran; Clifford Y Ko; Melinda Maggard Gibbons
Journal:  Obes Surg       Date:  2012-01       Impact factor: 4.129

Review 2.  Surgical treatment of obesity.

Authors:  Nancy Puzziferri; Jeanne Blankenship; Bruce M Wolfe
Journal:  Endocrine       Date:  2006-02       Impact factor: 3.633

3.  Chylothorax: unusual complication after laparoscopic gastric banding.

Authors:  Carlos Zerrweck; Robert Caiazzo; Laurent Arnalsteen; Guélareh Dezfoulian; Henry Porte; François Pattou
Journal:  Obes Surg       Date:  2009-01-27       Impact factor: 4.129

4.  SAGES guideline for clinical application of laparoscopic bariatric surgery.

Authors: 
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2008-10       Impact factor: 4.584

5.  Predictive factors of weight loss 1 year after laparoscopic gastric bypass in obese patients.

Authors:  Muriel Coupaye; Jean Marc Sabaté; Benjamin Castel; Pauline Jouet; Christine Clérici; Simon Msika; Séverine Ledoux
Journal:  Obes Surg       Date:  2010-12       Impact factor: 4.129

Review 6.  Update on obesity surgery.

Authors:  Dan Eisenberg; Andrew-J Duffy; Robert-L Bell
Journal:  World J Gastroenterol       Date:  2006-05-28       Impact factor: 5.742

7.  Cost-effectiveness of bariatric surgery for severely obese adults with diabetes.

Authors:  Thomas J Hoerger; Ping Zhang; Joel E Segel; Henry S Kahn; Lawrence E Barker; Steven Couper
Journal:  Diabetes Care       Date:  2010-09       Impact factor: 17.152

8.  Laparoscopic adjustable gastric banding outcomes in patients with gastroesophageal reflux disease or hiatal hernia.

Authors:  Vincenzo Pilone; Antonio Vitiello; Ariola Hasani; Rosa Di Micco; Angela Monda; Giuliano Izzo; Pietro Forestieri
Journal:  Obes Surg       Date:  2015-02       Impact factor: 4.129

Review 9.  Clinical application of laparoscopic bariatric surgery: an evidence-based review.

Authors:  Timothy M Farrell; Stephen P Haggerty; D Wayne Overby; Geoffrey P Kohn; William S Richardson; Robert D Fanelli
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2009-01-06       Impact factor: 4.584

10.  Concurrent Large Para-oesophageal Hiatal Hernia Repair and Laparoscopic Adjustable Gastric Banding: Results from 5-year Follow Up.

Authors:  Andrew J Long; Paul R Burton; Cheryl P Laurie; Margaret L Anderson; Geoff S Hebbard; Paul E O'Brien; Wendy A Brown
Journal:  Obes Surg       Date:  2016-05       Impact factor: 4.129

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.