Literature DB >> 15790488

The cell cycle phases of DNA damage and repair initiated by topoisomerase II-targeting chemotherapeutic drugs.

Alan J Potter1, Peter S Rabinovitch.   

Abstract

Although cytostasis and cytotoxicity induced by cancer chemotherapy drugs targeting topoisomerase II (topoII) arise in specific cell cycle phases, it is unknown whether the drug-initiated DNA damage triggering these responses, or the repair (reversal) of this damage, differs between cell cycle phases or between drug classes. Accordingly, we used a flow cytometric alkaline unwinding assay to measure DNA damage (strand breakage (SB)) and SB repair in each cell cycle compartment of human cancer cell lines treated with clinically relevant concentrations of doxorubicin, daunomycin, etoposide, and mitoxantrone. We found that treated HeLa and A549 cells exhibited the greatest SB in G2/M phase, the least in G1 phase, and generally an intermediate amount in S phase. The cell cycle phase specificity of the DNA damage appeared to be predictive of the cell cycle phase of growth arrest. Furthermore, it appeared to be dependent on topoIIalpha expression as the extent of SB did not differ between cell cycle compartments in topoIIalpha-diminished A549(VP)28 cells. HeLa cells were apparently unable to repair doxorubicin-initiated SB. The rate of repair of etoposide-initiated SB in HeLa cells and of mitoxantrone-initiated SB in HeLa and A549 cells was similar in each cell cycle compartment. In A549 cells, the rate of repair of doxorubicin and etoposide-initiated SB differed between cell cycle phases. Overall, these results indicate that the cell cycle phase specificity of cytostasis and cytotoxicity induced in tumor cells by topoII-targeting drugs may be directly related to the cell cycle phase specificity of the drug-initiated DNA damage. Analysis by cell cycle compartment appears to clarify some of the intercellular heterogeneity in the extent of drug-initiated DNA damage and cytotoxicity previously observed in cancer cells analyzed as a single population; this approach might be useful in resolving inconsistent results reported in investigations of tumor cell topoII content versus response to topoII-targeting drugs.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2005        PMID: 15790488     DOI: 10.1016/j.mrfmmm.2004.11.018

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Mutat Res        ISSN: 0027-5107            Impact factor:   2.433


  11 in total

1.  Antiproliferation and apoptosis induction of paeonol in HepG2 cells.

Authors:  Shu-Ping Xu; Guo-Ping Sun; Yu-Xian Shen; Wei Wei; Wan-Ren Peng; Hua Wang
Journal:  World J Gastroenterol       Date:  2007-01-14       Impact factor: 5.742

2.  Increased expression of P-glycoprotein is associated with doxorubicin chemoresistance in the metastatic 4T1 breast cancer model.

Authors:  Lili Bao; Aliyya Haque; Kamilah Jackson; Sidhartha Hazari; Krzysztof Moroz; Rachna Jetly; Srikanta Dash
Journal:  Am J Pathol       Date:  2011-02       Impact factor: 4.307

3.  Inhibition of topoisomerase IIα sensitizes FaDu cells to ionizing radiation by diminishing DNA repair.

Authors:  Ekram M Saleh
Journal:  Tumour Biol       Date:  2015-06-17

4.  Molecular targeting of MLL-rearranged leukemia cell lines with the synthetic peptide PFWT synergistically enhances the cytotoxic effect of established chemotherapeutic agents.

Authors:  Cecily A Bennett; Amanda C Winters; Nisha N Barretto; Charles S Hemenway
Journal:  Leuk Res       Date:  2009-02-20       Impact factor: 3.156

5.  A comparison of synthetic oligodeoxynucleotides, DNA fragments and AAV-1 for targeted episomal and chromosomal gene repair.

Authors:  Xavier Leclerc; Olivier Danos; Daniel Scherman; Antoine Kichler
Journal:  BMC Biotechnol       Date:  2009-04-20       Impact factor: 2.563

6.  ERK1/2 signaling plays an important role in topoisomerase II poison-induced G2/M checkpoint activation.

Authors:  Ryan H Kolb; Patrick M Greer; Phu T Cao; Kenneth H Cowan; Ying Yan
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2012-11-16       Impact factor: 3.240

7.  Homologous recombination repair is essential for repair of vosaroxin-induced DNA double-strand breaks.

Authors:  Rachael Elizabeth Hawtin; David Elliot Stockett; Oi Kwan Wong; Cecilia Lundin; Thomas Helleday; Judith Ann Fox
Journal:  Oncotarget       Date:  2010-11

8.  Inhibition of c-Abl kinase activity renders cancer cells highly sensitive to mitoxantrone.

Authors:  Kemal Alpay; Mehdi Farshchian; Johanna Tuomela; Jouko Sandholm; Kaappo Aittokallio; Elina Siljamäki; Marko Kallio; Veli-Matti Kähäri; Sakari Hietanen
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2014-08-22       Impact factor: 3.240

9.  Reptin regulates DNA double strand breaks repair in human hepatocellular carcinoma.

Authors:  Anne-Aurélie Raymond; Samira Benhamouche; Véronique Neaud; Julie Di Martino; Joaquim Javary; Jean Rosenbaum
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2015-04-15       Impact factor: 3.240

10.  [18F]FDG and [18F]FLT uptake in human breast cancer cells in relation to the effects of chemotherapy: an in vitro study.

Authors:  W G E Direcks; S C Berndsen; N Proost; G J Peters; J Balzarini; M D Spreeuwenberg; A A Lammertsma; C F M Molthoff
Journal:  Br J Cancer       Date:  2008-08-05       Impact factor: 7.640

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.