Literature DB >> 15790385

Bond strengths of nine current dentine adhesive systems to primary and permanent teeth.

F Courson1, D Bouter, N D Ruse, M Degrange.   

Abstract

The aim of this study was to compare the shear bond strength (SBS) of nine dentine bonding systems (DBS) of different classes to human primary and permanent dentine. Flat dentine occlusal surfaces were produced on human molars (100 primary, 100 permanent) by wet grinding on a 800-grit SiC paper. Nine DBS were applied following the manufacturers' instructions: One total etch multi-step system: Scotchbond Multipurpose Plus (3M/ESPE); Four total etch one-bottle system: Prime &Bond 2.1 (Dentsply), One Step (Bisco), Scotchbond 1 (3M/ESPE), and OptibondSolo Plus (Kerr); Three two-step self-etching primer systems: Clearfil Liner Bond 2 (Kuraray), Clearfil SE Bond (Kuraray), and Prime &Bond NT with NRC (Dentsply); An 'all-in-one' self-etching system: Prompt L-Pop (3M/ESPE). Composite (Z100; 3M/ESPE) cylinders (2 mm diameter, 3 mm high) were polymerized on the treated dentine surfaces and the specimens were stored at 37 degrees C for 24 h prior to testing. Twenty experimental groups were produced and tested. Statistical analysis revealed both a substrate and a bonding system effect. Two adhesive systems (One Step, Prime &Bond NT) had significantly higher bond strengths on permanent than on primary dentine. There was an effect of dentine bonding system on the mode of fracture. Although eight of the 10 DBS tested exhibited higher median SBS values on permanent dentine than on primary dentine, the dependent pairwise comparison identified a significant difference only for two groups. The use of simplified bonding systems does not necessarily result in improved bond strength to primary or to permanent dentine.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2005        PMID: 15790385     DOI: 10.1111/j.1365-2842.2004.01412.x

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Oral Rehabil        ISSN: 0305-182X            Impact factor:   3.837


  7 in total

1.  Zinc oxide eugenol paste jeopardises the adhesive bonding to primary dentine.

Authors:  C W Pires; T L Lenzi; F Z M Soares; R O Rocha
Journal:  Eur Arch Paediatr Dent       Date:  2018-05-12

Review 2.  Sealing Ability of Nano-ionomer in Primary Teeth: An ex vivo Study.

Authors:  Fawaz Siddiqui; Swati Karkare
Journal:  Int J Clin Pediatr Dent       Date:  2016-09-27

3.  An In Vitro Study of Effect of Beveling of Enamel on Microleakage and Shear Bond Strength of Adhesive Systems in Primary and Permanent Teeth.

Authors:  Shagun Patanjali; Anshul Arora; Ashtha Arya; Mandeep S Grewal
Journal:  Int J Clin Pediatr Dent       Date:  2019 May-Jun

4.  Adhesion to primary and permanent dentin and a simple model approach.

Authors:  Deniz C Can-Karabulut; Firdevs Tulga Oz; Baris Karabulut; Inci Batmaz; Ozlem Ilk
Journal:  Eur J Dent       Date:  2009-01

5.  Comparative evaluation of the effect of different bonding agents on the ultramorphology of primary tooth dentin and the resin dentin interface.

Authors:  Pallavi Vashisth; Mousumi Goswami; Mudit Mittal; Seema Chaudhary
Journal:  J Conserv Dent       Date:  2012-10

6.  Marginal adaptation and performance of bioactive dental restorative materials in deciduous and young permanent teeth.

Authors:  Elizabeta Gjorgievska; John W Nicholson; Snezana Iljovska; Ian J Slipper
Journal:  J Appl Oral Sci       Date:  2008 Jan-Feb       Impact factor: 2.698

7.  Bond strength and interfacial morphology of different dentin adhesives in primary teeth.

Authors:  Pallavi Vashisth; Mudit Mittal; Mousumi Goswami; Seema Chaudhary; Swati Dwivedi
Journal:  J Dent (Tehran)       Date:  2014-03-31
  7 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.