Literature DB >> 15790174

Arsenic speciation and toxicity in biological systems.

Kazi Farzana Akter1, Gary Owens, David E Davey, Ravi Naidu.   

Abstract

Although it is now commonly accepted that toxicity and bioavailability varies with As species, extensive research has been carried out on biological and environmental samples to assess toxicity and risk associated with As exposure based on total concentrations that may be in error. The health investigation guideline for the Australian environmental protection measure is 100 mg/kg (As(tot)), which would cause potential risk to human health if all the As present in a sample were bioavailable (ANZECC 1992). Similarly, the MPC for As in food is 1 mg/ kg (fresh weight), but this concentration may include contributions from As(III), AsV, and all organic species. Thus, a food substance, such as seafood, could have a high total concentration exceeding the guidelines, but most of the As would be in forms that are nontoxic to humans; i.e., the bioavailability is low, and the food would therefore be perfectly safe to eat. On the other hand, a food that has high bioavailability of As consequently is more toxic. Overall, it appears that contamination of water by As is probably more harmful to humans than As in food grains or vegetables, because As bioavailability in water is generally higher than its bioavailability in food. Nevertheless, As in food crops could make significant contribution toward total daily intake. Therefore, failure to consider the contribution of As species on their bioavailability could introduce a substantial bias into the estimation of risks associated with exposure as well as evaluation of As toxicity. In conclusion, As must be regarded as an important environmental toxicant because of its acute and chronic toxic properties and extensive presence in the environment. Much remains to be learned about its toxicology and biochemistry for better understanding of this important contaminant.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2005        PMID: 15790174     DOI: 10.1007/0-387-27565-7_3

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Rev Environ Contam Toxicol        ISSN: 0179-5953            Impact factor:   7.563


  34 in total

1.  Genomic potential for arsenic efflux and methylation varies among global Prochlorococcus populations.

Authors:  Jaclyn K Saunders; Gabrielle Rocap
Journal:  ISME J       Date:  2015-07-07       Impact factor: 10.302

2.  Fungal Bioweathering of Mimetite and a General Geomycological Model for Lead Apatite Mineral Biotransformations.

Authors:  Andrea Ceci; Martin Kierans; Stephen Hillier; Anna Maria Persiani; Geoffrey Michael Gadd
Journal:  Appl Environ Microbiol       Date:  2015-05-15       Impact factor: 4.792

Review 3.  Metal impurities in food and drugs.

Authors:  Darrell R Abernethy; Anthony J Destefano; Todd L Cecil; Kahkashan Zaidi; Roger L Williams
Journal:  Pharm Res       Date:  2010-03-09       Impact factor: 4.200

4.  The effect of arsenic on some antioxidant enzyme activities and lipid peroxidation in various tissues of mirror carp (Cyprinus carpio carpio).

Authors:  Sayit Altikat; Kazim Uysal; Halil Isa Kuru; Mustafa Kavasoglu; Gul Nihan Ozturk; Aysegul Kucuk
Journal:  Environ Sci Pollut Res Int       Date:  2014-04-27       Impact factor: 4.223

5.  A short-term study to evaluate the uptake and accumulation of arsenic in Asian willow (Salix sp.) from arsenic-contaminated water.

Authors:  Guangcai Chen; Xiaoli Zou; Yuan Zhou; Jianfeng Zhang; Gary Owens
Journal:  Environ Sci Pollut Res Int       Date:  2013-11-12       Impact factor: 4.223

6.  Prepubertal exposure to arsenic(III) suppresses circulating insulin-like growth factor-1 (IGF-1) delaying sexual maturation in female rats.

Authors:  Michael P Reilly; James C Saca; Alina Hamilton; Rene F Solano; Jesse R Rivera; Wendy Whitehouse-Innis; Jason G Parsons; Robert K Dearth
Journal:  Reprod Toxicol       Date:  2013-09-30       Impact factor: 3.143

7.  Arsenic speciation and spatial and interspecies differences of metal concentrations in mollusks and crustaceans from a South China estuary.

Authors:  Wei Zhang; Wen-Xiong Wang; Li Zhang
Journal:  Ecotoxicology       Date:  2013-03-09       Impact factor: 2.823

8.  Dual actions involved in arsenite-induced oxidative DNA damage.

Authors:  Xu-Jun Qin; Laurie G Hudson; Wenlan Liu; Wei Ding; Karen L Cooper; Ke Jian Liu
Journal:  Chem Res Toxicol       Date:  2008-08-16       Impact factor: 3.739

9.  Differential sensitivities of bone marrow, spleen and thymus to genotoxicity induced by environmentally relevant concentrations of arsenite.

Authors:  Huan Xu; Shea McClain; Sebastian Medina; Fredine T Lauer; Christelle Douillet; Ke Jian Liu; Laurie G Hudson; Miroslav Stýblo; Scott W Burchiel
Journal:  Toxicol Lett       Date:  2016-09-19       Impact factor: 4.372

10.  Synergistic interaction of glyceraldehydes-3-phosphate dehydrogenase and ArsJ, a novel organoarsenical efflux permease, confers arsenate resistance.

Authors:  Jian Chen; Masafumi Yoshinaga; Luis D Garbinski; Barry P Rosen
Journal:  Mol Microbiol       Date:  2016-04-20       Impact factor: 3.501

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.