Literature DB >> 15789939

Determinants of the quality of life of patients with congenital heart disease.

Matthias Rose1, Kerstin Köhler, Friedrich Köhler, Barbara Sawitzky, Herbert Fliege, Burghard F Klapp.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: The improvement of the quality of life of chronically ill patients has become an important goal in treatment. However, it is seldom taken into account that many other factors, in addition to somatic factors, have an influence on the quality of life of patients. Using patients with congenital heart defects as an example, we examined the relative significance of biological factors, compared to psychological and social factors, for the various quality of life dimensions. RESEARCH DESIGN AND METHODS: One hundred and eleven patients (aged 33+/-12 years) with different degrees of cardiac dysfunction were examined (NYHA 0: 2 I: 56, II: 38, III: 13, IV: 2). All patients for whom there was no contra-indication underwent a treadmill ergometry in order to determine their level of cardiopulmonary functioning (peak oxygen consumption: VO2max). All patients were asked to fill out questionnaires concerning their quality of life (WHOQOL-Bref), their cardiac complaints (Giessener Complaint Questionnaire GBB), their personality traits (Giessen Test GTS), and the social support they experience (Social Support Questionnaire SOZU-k22). The data were analyzed using a linear structural equation model (SEM).
RESULTS: In all aspects but the social domain, the HRQL of CgHD patients was significantly diminished compared to the normal population. The SEM proposed was valid, showing good indices of fit (chi2 = 1.18; p = 0.55; AGFI = 0.92). The level of cardiopulmonary functioning was most significant for the reporting of specific cardiac complaints (beta = -28) and for the physical component of the general HRQL (beta = 32), although the former was also influenced by a depressed disposition (beta = -0.20) and the extent of social support experienced (beta = 0.18). The objective findings, however, had virtually no individual significance for the psychological (beta = 0.09) and social domains (beta = -0.02). These HRQL domains are primarily influenced by depressive personality traits (beta= -26/-0.16) and the social support experienced (beta = 0.51/0.51).
CONCLUSIONS: The patient's organic dysfunction primarily determines illness-specific complaints but has little relevance for the psychological and social aspects of the HRQL. These aspects are predominantly determined by the patient's depressive disposition and by the experienced social support. A successful therapy should therefore take biological as well as psycho-social determinants of the quality of life into account.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2005        PMID: 15789939     DOI: 10.1007/s11136-004-0611-7

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Qual Life Res        ISSN: 0962-9343            Impact factor:   4.147


  18 in total

1.  Evaluating quality-of-life measures for clinical trials in Germany.

Authors:  M Bullinger; J Hasford
Journal:  Control Clin Trials       Date:  1991-08

2.  Use of limb movement sensors as indicators of the level of everyday physical activity in chronic congestive heart failure.

Authors:  S W Davies; S L Jordan; D P Lipkin
Journal:  Am J Cardiol       Date:  1992-06-15       Impact factor: 2.778

3.  Measurement of clinical efficacy in studies of heart failure.

Authors:  T S Rector
Journal:  Circulation       Date:  1998-02-24       Impact factor: 29.690

4.  Health related quality of life in patients with congestive heart failure: comparison with other chronic diseases and relation to functional variables.

Authors:  J Juenger; D Schellberg; S Kraemer; A Haunstetter; C Zugck; W Herzog; M Haass
Journal:  Heart       Date:  2002-03       Impact factor: 5.994

5.  Evaluation of dyspnea using the exercise test.

Authors:  K Wasserman
Journal:  Pneumonol Pol       Date:  1987 Nov-Dec

6.  Linking clinical variables with health-related quality of life. A conceptual model of patient outcomes.

Authors:  I B Wilson; P D Cleary
Journal:  JAMA       Date:  1995-01-04       Impact factor: 56.272

7.  Quality of life experienced by adults with congenital heart disease.

Authors:  Lynn Coletta Simko; Kathleen A McGinnis
Journal:  AACN Clin Issues       Date:  2003-02

8.  The anaerobic threshold measurement in exercise testing.

Authors:  K Wasserman
Journal:  Clin Chest Med       Date:  1984-03       Impact factor: 2.878

9.  Evaluation of the short-form 36-item questionnaire to measure health-related quality of life in patients with COPD.

Authors:  D A Mahler; J I Mackowiak
Journal:  Chest       Date:  1995-06       Impact factor: 9.410

10.  Quality of life in adults with congenital heart disease.

Authors:  D A Lane; G Y H Lip; T A Millane
Journal:  Heart       Date:  2002-07       Impact factor: 5.994

View more
  18 in total

1.  Quality of life assessment in cardiac populations.

Authors:  Hannah McGee
Journal:  Wien Klin Wochenschr       Date:  2006-12       Impact factor: 1.704

2.  Pretreatment fertility counseling and fertility preservation improve quality of life in reproductive age women with cancer.

Authors:  Joseph M Letourneau; Erin E Ebbel; Patricia P Katz; Audra Katz; Wei Z Ai; A Jo Chien; Michelle E Melisko; Marcelle I Cedars; Mitchell P Rosen
Journal:  Cancer       Date:  2011-09-01       Impact factor: 6.860

3.  Quality of life and autonomy in emerging adults with early-onset neuromuscular disorders.

Authors:  Darcy J Huismann; Jane P Sheldon; Beverly M Yashar; Kimberly Amburgey; James J Dowling; Elizabeth M Petty
Journal:  J Genet Couns       Date:  2012-02-25       Impact factor: 2.537

4.  Quality of life, health status, and depression: comparison between adolescents and adults after the Fontan procedure with healthy counterparts.

Authors:  Nancy A Pike; Lorraine S Evangelista; Lynn V Doering; Jo-Ann Eastwood; Alan B Lewis; John S Child
Journal:  J Cardiovasc Nurs       Date:  2012 Nov-Dec       Impact factor: 2.083

5.  Clinical profile of the adolescent/adult Fontan survivor.

Authors:  Nancy A Pike; Lorraine S Evangelista; Lynn V Doering; Deborah Koniak-Griffin; Alan B Lewis; John S Child
Journal:  Congenit Heart Dis       Date:  2011 Jan-Feb       Impact factor: 2.007

6.  Quality of life experienced by adolescents and young adults with congenital heart disease.

Authors:  Flávio Miguel Teixeira; Rosália Maria Coelho; Cidália Proença; Ana Margarida Silva; Daniela Vieira; Cláudia Vaz; Cláudia Moura; Victor Viana; José Carlos Areias; Maria Emília Guimarães Areias
Journal:  Pediatr Cardiol       Date:  2011-06-28       Impact factor: 1.655

7.  The psychopathological influence of congenital heart disease in Korean male adolescents: an analysis of multiphasic personal inventory test results.

Authors:  Chang Hyun Oh; Hyun Kyoung Lim; Joonho Chung; Seung Hwan Yoon; Hyeong-Chun Park; Chong Oon Park
Journal:  Yonsei Med J       Date:  2012-11-01       Impact factor: 2.759

8.  Interpretation bias for heart sensations in congenital heart disease and its relation to quality of life.

Authors:  Petra A Karsdorp; Merel Kindt; Simon Rietveld; Walter Everaerd; Barbara J M Mulder
Journal:  Int J Behav Med       Date:  2008

9.  Quality of life of people who inject drugs: characteristics and comparisons with other population samples.

Authors:  Jane A Fischer; Sue Conrad; Alexandra M Clavarino; Robert Kemp; Jackob M Najman
Journal:  Qual Life Res       Date:  2013-01-23       Impact factor: 4.147

10.  Parent- versus child-reported functional health status after the Fontan procedure.

Authors:  Linda M Lambert; L LuAnn Minich; Jane W Newburger; Minmin Lu; Victoria L Pemberton; Ellen A McGrath; Andrew M Atz; Mingfen Xu; Elizabeth Radojewski; Darlene Servedio; Brian W McCrindle
Journal:  Pediatrics       Date:  2009-10-19       Impact factor: 7.124

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.