Literature DB >> 15789199

[Allergic contact dermatitis from a hydrocolloid dressing due to colophony sensitization].

A Körber1, S Kohaus, M Geisheimer, S Grabbe, J Dissemond.   

Abstract

A 62-year-old female patient with a venous leg ulcer developed massive eczema during wound bed preparation with the hydrocolloid dressing Varihesive. The patch testing confirmed a pronounced sensitization to the hydrocolloid dressing apart from the sensitization to colophony. After review of the current literature we found several case reports from the last 10 years about sensitization to hydrocolloids which were identical but distributed under different brand names in different countries. These dressings contain the pentaerythritol ester of hydrogenated rosin as the tackifying agent which is the substance retaining the sensitizing potential of colophony. Especially patients with chronic wounds frequently tend to contact sensitizations, and colophony currently represents the 4th most frequent allergen in Germany. Therefore, highly potent allergens such as colophony should be strictly avoided as a content material of modern wound dressings.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2006        PMID: 15789199     DOI: 10.1007/s00105-005-0913-x

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Hautarzt        ISSN: 0017-8470            Impact factor:   0.751


  7 in total

1.  Pentaerythritol-esterified gum rosin as a sensitizer in Granuflex hydrocolloid dressing.

Authors:  A M Downs; L A Sharp; J E Sansom
Journal:  Contact Dermatitis       Date:  1999-09       Impact factor: 6.600

2.  Allergic contact dermatitis from hydrocolloid dressings.

Authors:  M Schliz; A Rauterberg; J Weiss
Journal:  Contact Dermatitis       Date:  1996-02       Impact factor: 6.600

3.  Contact sensitization in chronic venous insufficiency: modern wound dressings.

Authors:  G Gallenkemper; E Rabe; R Bauer
Journal:  Contact Dermatitis       Date:  1998-05       Impact factor: 6.600

4.  Allergic contact dermatitis from hydrocolloid dressings.

Authors:  D Sasseville; D Tennstedt; J M Lachapelle
Journal:  Am J Contact Dermat       Date:  1997-12

5.  [Differentiated contact allergy lists serve in quality improvement].

Authors:  J Brasch; J Geier; A Schnuch
Journal:  Hautarzt       Date:  1998-03       Impact factor: 0.751

6.  Allergic contact dermatitis from Granuflex hydrocolloid dressing.

Authors:  E Mallon; S M Powell
Journal:  Contact Dermatitis       Date:  1994-02       Impact factor: 6.600

Review 7.  A high prevalence of sensitization still persists in leg ulcer patients: a retrospective series of 106 patients tested between 2001 and 2002 and a meta-analysis of 1975-2003 data.

Authors:  L Machet; C Couhé; A Perrinaud; C Hoarau; G Lorette; L Vaillant
Journal:  Br J Dermatol       Date:  2004-05       Impact factor: 9.302

  7 in total
  3 in total

1.  [Exudate capacity of modern wound dressings during compression therapy for chronic venous leg ulcers].

Authors:  A Körber; M Weindorf; J Dissemond
Journal:  Hautarzt       Date:  2008-11       Impact factor: 0.751

2.  A Case of Allergic Contact Dermatitis Due to DuoDERM Extrathin®.

Authors:  Eun Ah Suhng; Ji Yeon Byun; You Won Choi; Ki Bum Myung; Hae Young Choi
Journal:  Ann Dermatol       Date:  2011-12-27       Impact factor: 1.444

3.  [Contact allergies in patients with chronic wounds: results of a study from 1999 to 2004].

Authors:  M Lehnen; S Kohaus; A Körber; U Hillen; S Grabbe; J Dissemond
Journal:  Hautarzt       Date:  2006-04       Impact factor: 0.751

  3 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.