Literature DB >> 15788384

The effectiveness of hearing protection among construction workers.

Richard Neitzel1, Noah Seixas.   

Abstract

Effective hearing conservation programs in the construction industry are rare. Where programs are present, they often rely on workers' use of hearing protection devices (HPDs) rather than on exposure controls to reduce noise exposure levels. Dependence on HPDs for protection from high noise is problematic, as the protection provided by the HPD depends on both the HPD's attenuation level and the time the HPD is used. This article presents an analysis of data on noise exposure and hearing protection among construction workers drawn from several large datasets covering nine construction trades. A unique combination of 1-min dosimetry noise exposure levels and simultaneous self-reported use of HPDs was evaluated, as were occupational and nonoccupational HPD use data collected by questionnaire as part of a longitudinal study of noise exposure and hearing loss among apprentices. Direct measurements of HPD attenuation were also made on workers at their work site. The workers assessed in this study were found to use hearing protection less than one-quarter of the time that they were exposed above 85 dBA. Workers who reported always using HPDs in high noise on questionnaires were found to wear them only one-third of the time their exposures exceeded 85 dBA. Workers' self-reported use of HPDs during most noisy nonoccupational activities was also found to be low. Direct attenuation measurements found that workers were able to achieve more than 50% of the rated attenuation of their HPD on average, but that the variability in achieved attenuation was large. When the measured HPD attenuation levels and use time data were combined, the effective protection afforded by HPDs was less than 3 dB, a negligible amount given the high exposure levels associated with construction work. However, there was substantial variation in effective protection among the different trades assessed. These results demonstrate the need for better hearing conservation programs and expanded noise control efforts in the construction industry.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2005        PMID: 15788384     DOI: 10.1080/15459620590932154

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Occup Environ Hyg        ISSN: 1545-9624            Impact factor:   2.155


  26 in total

1.  Predictors of hearing protection behavior among firefighters in the United States.

Authors:  Oisaeng Hong; Dal Lae Chin; David L Ronis
Journal:  Int J Behav Med       Date:  2013-03

2.  A multi-component intervention to promote hearing protector use among construction workers.

Authors:  Noah S Seixas; Rick Neitzel; Bert Stover; Lianne Sheppard; Bill Daniell; Jane Edelson; Hendrika Meischke
Journal:  Int J Audiol       Date:  2010-11-24       Impact factor: 2.117

3.  Evaluation and comparison of three exposure assessment techniques.

Authors:  R L Neitzel; W E Daniell; L Sheppard; H W Davies; N S Seixas
Journal:  J Occup Environ Hyg       Date:  2011-05       Impact factor: 2.155

4.  Predictors of hearing protection use in construction workers.

Authors:  Jane Edelson; Richard Neitzel; Hendrika Meischke; William Daniell; Lianne Sheppard; Bert Stover; Noah Seixas
Journal:  Ann Occup Hyg       Date:  2009-06-16

5.  Longitudinal assessment of noise exposure in a cohort of construction workers.

Authors:  Richard L Neitzel; Bert Stover; Noah S Seixas
Journal:  Ann Occup Hyg       Date:  2011-08-08

6.  Methods for evaluating temporal trends in noise exposure.

Authors:  R L Neitzel; D Galusha; C Dixon-Ernst; P M Rabinowitz
Journal:  Int J Audiol       Date:  2014-03       Impact factor: 2.117

7.  Prediction of hearing loss among the noise-exposed workers in a steel factory using artificial intelligence approach.

Authors:  Mohsen Aliabadi; Maryam Farhadian; Ebrahim Darvishi
Journal:  Int Arch Occup Environ Health       Date:  2014-11-29       Impact factor: 3.015

8.  A retrospective analysis of noise-induced hearing loss in the Dutch construction industry.

Authors:  M C J Leensen; J C van Duivenbooden; W A Dreschler
Journal:  Int Arch Occup Environ Health       Date:  2011-01-04       Impact factor: 3.015

9.  Safety climate, hearing climate and hearing protection device use among transportation road maintainers.

Authors:  Jennifer M Cavallari; Katrina A Burch; Jeffrey Hanrahan; Jennifer L Garza; Alicia G Dugan
Journal:  Am J Ind Med       Date:  2019-05-19       Impact factor: 2.214

10.  Indicators of hearing protection use: self-report and researcher observation.

Authors:  Stephanie C Griffin; Richard Neitzel; William E Daniell; Noah S Seixas
Journal:  J Occup Environ Hyg       Date:  2009-10       Impact factor: 2.155

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.