Literature DB >> 15788375

Seasonal allergic rhinitic and normal subjects respond differentially to nasal provocation with acetic acid vapor.

Dennis Shusterman1, Alice Tarun, Mary Alice Murphy, John Morris.   

Abstract

Individuals with seasonal allergic rhinitis (SAR) show a more marked nasal obstructive response (increases in nasal airways resistance or NAR) after provocation with chlorine gas (Cl2) than do nonrhinitic (NR) controls. We were interested in learning whether similar differential responsiveness was apparent after provocation with acetic acid vapor. Sixteen nonsmoking, nonasthmatic subjects, aged 21-63 yr, equally divided by gender and nasal allergy status, were enrolled in a single-blinded crossover study involving exposure to acetic acid (AA) vapor (15 ppm) or air for 15 min on separate days 1 wk apart. NAR was measured in triplicate before, immediately post-, and 15 min postexposure, was normalized to baseline on a given exposure day, and was expressed as Net [NAR/baseline] after acetic acid versus control (air) exposure. After log transformation to achieve normality, the mean loge of Net [NAR/baseline] was 0.22 for SAR subjects and -0.11 for NR subjects immediately postexposure (p<.05); the corresponding values were 0.24 and -0.08, respectively, at 15 min postexposure (p<.05). Inhalation of acetic acid at the (NIOSH-recommended) short-term exposure limit of 15 ppm for 15 min produces differential nasal airflow obstruction among SAR versus NR subjects, with the former showing greater physiologic reactivity to this stimulus. This differential responsiveness is consistent with our previous findings with Cl2, indicating that there may be a generalized susceptibility factor associated with allergic rhinitis. The response occurs with slight subjective nasal irritation.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2005        PMID: 15788375     DOI: 10.1080/08958370590904508

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Inhal Toxicol        ISSN: 0895-8378            Impact factor:   2.724


  6 in total

1.  Occupational rhinosinusitis and upper airway disease: the world trade center experience.

Authors:  Rafael E de la Hoz; Michael R Shohet; Jeffrey M Cohen
Journal:  Curr Allergy Asthma Rep       Date:  2010-03       Impact factor: 4.806

Review 2.  Occupational irritant and allergic rhinitis.

Authors:  Dennis Shusterman
Journal:  Curr Allergy Asthma Rep       Date:  2014-04       Impact factor: 4.806

3.  Evaluation of trigeminal sensitivity to ammonia in asthmatics and healthy human volunteers.

Authors:  Maja Petrova; Jeanmarie Diamond; Benno Schuster; Pamela Dalton
Journal:  Inhal Toxicol       Date:  2008-09       Impact factor: 2.724

Review 4.  Sensory irritation as a basis for setting occupational exposure limits.

Authors:  Thomas Brüning; Rüdiger Bartsch; Hermann Maximillian Bolt; Herbert Desel; Hans Drexler; Ursula Gundert-Remy; Andrea Hartwig; Rudolf Jäckh; Edgar Leibold; Dirk Pallapies; Albert W Rettenmeier; Gerhard Schlüter; Gisela Stropp; Kirsten Sucker; Gerhard Triebig; Götz Westphal; Christoph van Thriel
Journal:  Arch Toxicol       Date:  2014-09-03       Impact factor: 5.153

Review 5.  EAACI position paper on occupational rhinitis.

Authors:  Gianna Moscato; Olivier Vandenplas; Roy Gerth Van Wijk; Jean-Luc Malo; Luca Perfetti; Santiago Quirce; Jolanta Walusiak; Roberto Castano; Gianni Pala; Denyse Gautrin; Hans De Groot; Ilenia Folletti; Mona Rita Yacoub; Andrea Siracusa
Journal:  Respir Res       Date:  2009-03-03

6.  Concentrations of Formic Acid, Acetic Acid, and Ammonia in Newly Constructed Houses.

Authors:  Norimichi Suzuki; Hiroko Nakaoka; Akifumi Eguchi; Masamichi Hanazato; Yoshitake Nakayama; Kayo Tsumura; Kohki Takaguchi; Kazunari Takaya; Emiko Todaka; Chisato Mori
Journal:  Int J Environ Res Public Health       Date:  2020-03-16       Impact factor: 3.390

  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.