Literature DB >> 15788184

Body mass prediction from stature and bi-iliac breadth in two high latitude populations, with application to earlier higher latitude humans.

Christopher Ruff1, Markku Niskanen, Juho-Antti Junno, Paul Jamison.   

Abstract

Previous studies have indicated that body mass can be estimated from stature and bi-iliac (maximum pelvic) breadth with reasonable accuracy in modern humans, supporting the use of this method to estimate body mass in earlier human skeletal samples. However, to date the method has not been tested specifically on high latitude individuals, whose body form in some ways more closely approximates that of earlier higher latitude humans (i.e., large and broad-bodied). In this study, anthropometric data for 67 Alaskan Inupiat and 54 Finnish adults were used to test the stature/bi-iliac body mass estimation method. Both samples are very broad-bodied, and the Finnish sample is very tall as well. The method generally works well in these individuals, with average directional biases in body mass estimates of 3% or less, except in male Finns, whose body masses are systematically underestimated by an average of almost 9%. A majority of individuals in the total pooled sample have estimates to within +/-10% of their true body masses, and more than three-quarters have estimates to within +/-15%. The major factor found to affect directional bias is shoulder to hip breadth (biacromial/bi-iliac breadth). Male Finns have particularly wide shoulders, which may in part explain their systematic underestimation. New body mass estimation equations are developed that include the new data from this study. When applied to a sample of earlier (late middle Pleistocene to early Upper Paleolithic) higher latitude skeletal specimens, differences between previous and new body estimates are small (less than 2%). However, because the Finns significantly extend the range of morphological variation beyond that represented in the original world-wide reference sample used in developing the method, thereby increasing its generality, it is recommended that these new formulas be used in subsequent body mass estimations.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2005        PMID: 15788184     DOI: 10.1016/j.jhevol.2004.11.009

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Hum Evol        ISSN: 0047-2484            Impact factor:   3.895


  10 in total

1.  Estimation of African apes' body size from postcranial dimensions.

Authors:  Markku Niskanen; Juho-Antti Junno
Journal:  Primates       Date:  2009-02-17       Impact factor: 2.163

2.  Body size, body proportions, and encephalization in a Middle Pleistocene archaic human from northern China.

Authors:  Karen R Rosenberg; Lü Zuné; Christopher B Ruff
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2006-02-27       Impact factor: 11.205

3.  The evolution of human and ape hand proportions.

Authors:  Sergio Almécija; Jeroen B Smaers; William L Jungers
Journal:  Nat Commun       Date:  2015-07-14       Impact factor: 14.919

4.  Genetic population structure accounts for contemporary ecogeographic patterns in tropic and subtropic-dwelling humans.

Authors:  Daniel J Hruschka; Craig Hadley; Alexandra A Brewis; Christopher M Stojanowski
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2015-03-27       Impact factor: 3.240

Review 5.  Rich table but short life: Diffuse idiopathic skeletal hyperostosis in Danish astronomer Tycho Brahe (1546-1601) and its possible consequences.

Authors:  Sacha Kacki; Petr Velemínský; Niels Lynnerup; Sylva Kaupová; Alizé Lacoste Jeanson; Ctibor Povýšil; Martin Horák; Jan Kučera; Kaare Lund Rasmussen; Jaroslav Podliska; Zdeněk Dragoun; Jiří Smolík; Jens Vellev; Jaroslav Brůžek
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2018-04-19       Impact factor: 3.240

6.  Estimating body mass and composition from proximal femur dimensions using dual energy x-ray absorptiometry.

Authors:  Emma Pomeroy; Veena Mushrif-Tripathy; Bharati Kulkarni; Sanjay Kinra; Jay T Stock; Tim J Cole; Meghan K Shirley; Jonathan C K Wells
Journal:  Archaeol Anthropol Sci       Date:  2018-06-18       Impact factor: 1.989

7.  Pregnancy outcomes in Korean women with ankylosing spondylitis.

Authors:  Eun Hye Park; Jung Sun Lee; Ye-Jee Kim; Seung Mi Lee; Jong Kwan Jun; Eun Bong Lee; Yong-Gil Kim
Journal:  Korean J Intern Med       Date:  2019-09-26       Impact factor: 2.884

8.  Belly fat or bloating? New insights into the physical appearance of St Anthony of Padua.

Authors:  Jessica Mongillo; Giulia Vescovo; Barbara Bramanti
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2021-12-21       Impact factor: 3.240

9.  Temporal trends in vertebral size and shape from medieval to modern-day.

Authors:  Juho-Antti Junno; Markku Niskanen; Miika T Nieminen; Heli Maijanen; Jaakko Niinimäki; Risto Bloigu; Juha Tuukkanen
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2009-03-12       Impact factor: 3.240

10.  Relationship between body mass, lean mass, fat mass, and limb bone cross-sectional geometry: Implications for estimating body mass and physique from the skeleton.

Authors:  Emma Pomeroy; Alison Macintosh; Jonathan C K Wells; Tim J Cole; Jay T Stock
Journal:  Am J Phys Anthropol       Date:  2018-01-18       Impact factor: 2.868

  10 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.