Literature DB >> 15787012

Database design and implementation for quantitative image analysis research.

Matthew S Brown1, Sumit K Shah, Richard C Pais, Yeng-Zhong Lee, Michael F McNitt-Gray, Jonathan G Goldin, Alfonso F Cardenas, Denise R Aberle.   

Abstract

Quantitative image analysis (QIA) goes beyond subjective visual assessment to provide computer measurements of the image content, typically following image segmentation to identify anatomical regions of interest (ROIs). Commercially available picture archiving and communication systems focus on storage of image data. They are not well suited to efficient storage and mining of new types of quantitative data. In this paper, we present a system that integrates image segmentation, quantitation, and characterization with database and data mining facilities. The paper includes generic process and data models for QIA in medicine and describes their practical use. The data model is based upon the Digital Imaging and Communications in Medicine (DICOM) data hierarchy, which is augmented with tables to store segmentation results (ROIs) and quantitative data from multiple experiments. Data mining for statistical analysis of the quantitative data is described along with example queries. The database is implemented in PostgreSQL on a UNIX server. Database requirements and capabilities are illustrated through two quantitative imaging experiments related to lung cancer screening and assessment of emphysema lung disease. The system can manage the large amounts of quantitative data necessary for research, development, and deployment of computer-aided diagnosis tools.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2005        PMID: 15787012     DOI: 10.1109/titb.2004.837854

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  IEEE Trans Inf Technol Biomed        ISSN: 1089-7771


  7 in total

1.  Imaging informatics: challenges in multi-site imaging trials.

Authors:  Steve Langer; Brian Bartholmai
Journal:  J Digit Imaging       Date:  2011-02       Impact factor: 4.056

Review 2.  Quantitative imaging biomarker ontology (QIBO) for knowledge representation of biomedical imaging biomarkers.

Authors:  Andrew J Buckler; Tiffany Ting Liu; Erica Savig; Baris E Suzek; M Ouellette; J Danagoulian; G Wernsing; Daniel L Rubin; David Paik
Journal:  J Digit Imaging       Date:  2013-08       Impact factor: 4.056

Review 3.  A novel knowledge representation framework for the statistical validation of quantitative imaging biomarkers.

Authors:  Andrew J Buckler; David Paik; Matt Ouellette; Jovanna Danagoulian; Gary Wernsing; Baris E Suzek
Journal:  J Digit Imaging       Date:  2013-08       Impact factor: 4.056

4.  Design of a Web-tool for diagnostic clinical trials handling medical imaging research.

Authors:  Alicia Baltasar Sánchez; Angel González-Sistal
Journal:  J Digit Imaging       Date:  2011-04       Impact factor: 4.056

5.  An architecture for computer-aided detection and radiologic measurement of lung nodules in clinical trials.

Authors:  Matthew S Brown; Richard Pais; Peiyuan Qing; Sumit Shah; Michael F McNitt-Gray; Jonathan G Goldin; Iva Petkovska; Lien Tran; Denise R Aberle
Journal:  Cancer Inform       Date:  2007-05-12

Review 6.  Review of Developments in Electronic, Clinical Data Collection, and Documentation Systems over the Last Decade - Are We Ready for Big Data in Routine Health Care?

Authors:  Kerstin A Kessel; Stephanie E Combs
Journal:  Front Oncol       Date:  2016-03-30       Impact factor: 6.244

7.  Standardization in Quantitative Imaging: A Multicenter Comparison of Radiomic Features from Different Software Packages on Digital Reference Objects and Patient Data Sets.

Authors:  M McNitt-Gray; S Napel; A Jaggi; S A Mattonen; L Hadjiiski; M Muzi; D Goldgof; Y Balagurunathan; L A Pierce; P E Kinahan; E F Jones; A Nguyen; A Virkud; H P Chan; N Emaminejad; M Wahi-Anwar; M Daly; M Abdalah; H Yang; L Lu; W Lv; A Rahmim; A Gastounioti; S Pati; S Bakas; D Kontos; B Zhao; J Kalpathy-Cramer; K Farahani
Journal:  Tomography       Date:  2020-06
  7 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.