Literature DB >> 15786855

Reduction in neonatal intensive care unit admission rates in a Medicaid managed care program.

Joseph A Stankaitis1, Howard R Brill, Darlene M Walker.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Neonatal intensive care unit admission rates are an important birth outcome indicator for Medicaid managed care organizations.
OBJECTIVES: To reduce neonatal intensive care unit admission rates by at least 15% and to maintain that reduction through implementation of a quality improvement program. STUDY
DESIGN: The organization performed a longitudinal population-based review of its birth outcomes from 1997 through 2003, focusing on neonatal intensive care unit admission rates. The return-on-investment evaluation reflected attributable incremental program costs and resultant savings.
METHODS: Interventions included enhanced identification and stratification of high-risk women with the use of a health risk assessment form; outreach through nursing care coordination offering home visits, transportation, support services, social work services, and connection with other community-based organizations; and implementation of a strong informatics structure.
RESULTS: Neonatal intensive care unit admission rates decreased from 107.6 per 1000 births in 1998 to 56.7 per 1000 births in 2003. The return on investment from the incremental program enhancements was just over dollars 2 per dollars 1 expended.
CONCLUSION: A program that identifies its high-risk pregnant enrollees in a timely fashion, provides outreach using a strong nursing care coordination and social work emphasis, and has an enhanced informatics structure can significantly affect birth outcomes for a Medicaid managed care population.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2005        PMID: 15786855

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Am J Manag Care        ISSN: 1088-0224            Impact factor:   2.229


  6 in total

1.  Predictions of the affordable care act's impact on neonatal practice.

Authors:  S I Shah; H L Brumberg
Journal:  J Perinatol       Date:  2016-08       Impact factor: 2.521

Review 2.  Health Outcomes and Costs of Social Work Services: A Systematic Review.

Authors:  Gail Steketee; Abigail M Ross; Madeline K Wachman
Journal:  Am J Public Health       Date:  2017-12       Impact factor: 9.308

3.  Are prenatal care resources distributed efficiently across high-risk and low-risk mothers?

Authors:  Sankar Mukhopadhyay; Jeanne Wendel
Journal:  Int J Health Care Finance Econ       Date:  2008-05-22

4.  The business case for preconception care: methods and issues.

Authors:  Scott D Grosse; Sergey V Sotnikov; Sheila Leatherman; Michele Curtis
Journal:  Matern Child Health J       Date:  2006-09

5.  Perinatal Health Outcomes Following a Community Health Worker-Supported Home-Visiting Program in Rochester, New York, 2015-2018.

Authors:  Zhi Pan; Peter Veazie; Mardy Sandler; Ann Dozier; Melissa Molongo; Tiffany Pulcino; Wendy Parisi; Katherine W Eisenberg
Journal:  Am J Public Health       Date:  2020-05-21       Impact factor: 11.561

6.  Risky substance exposure during pregnancy: a pilot study from Lebanese mothers.

Authors:  Samar Rachidi; Sanaa Awada; Amal Al-Hajje; Wafaa Bawab; Salam Zein; Nadine Saleh; Pascale Salameh
Journal:  Drug Healthc Patient Saf       Date:  2013-05-15
  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.