Literature DB >> 15786487

Escitalopram in clinical practice: results of an open-label trial in a naturalistic setting.

A John Rush1, Anjana Bose.   

Abstract

Results from randomized, placebo-controlled clinical trials have demonstrated that escitalopram is effective and well tolerated in the treatment of depression and anxiety disorders. Such trials typically employ stringent inclusion criteria that may limit the generalizability of findings to the broader population of patients treated in psychiatric and primary care practices. The objective of the current trial was to assess the effect of escitalopram treatment on depressed outpatients in naturalistic settings. This 8-week open-label trial enrolled 5,453 outpatients aged > or = 18 years with nonpsychotic major depressive disorder from primary care (n = 2,591), psychiatric (n = 2,289), and other specialty (n = 573) practices. Escitalopram was initiated at 10 mg/day, and dose could be increased to a maximum of 20 mg/day. Efficacy measures included the Clinical Global Impressions of Improvement (CGI-I) scale, Patient Global Evaluation (PGE) scale, Hospital Anxiety and Depression Scale, Sheehan Disability Scale, and 12-Item Short Form Health Survey. Overall, 76% of patients completed 8 weeks of treatment. The mean dose of escitalopram was 11.6 mg/day. At endpoint, response rates (defined as a score < or = 2 on the CGI-I or PGE) were 68% on the clinician-assessed CGI-I and 66% on the PGE. Improvement was not related to age or response to prior antidepressant treatment. Overall, 9% of patients discontinued due to adverse events. Escitalopram treatment was well tolerated and associated with robust response rates in a broadly representative population of depressed outpatients. Copyright 2005 Wiley-Liss, Inc

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2005        PMID: 15786487     DOI: 10.1002/da.20051

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Depress Anxiety        ISSN: 1091-4269            Impact factor:   6.505


  7 in total

Review 1.  Tolerability of selective serotonin reuptake inhibitors: issues relevant to the elderly.

Authors:  Brian Draper; Karen Berman
Journal:  Drugs Aging       Date:  2008       Impact factor: 3.923

2.  Efficacy and safety of escitalopram versus citalopram in major depressive disorder: a 6-week, multicenter, randomized, double-blind, flexible-dose study.

Authors:  Jian-Jun Ou; Guang-Lei Xun; Ren-Rong Wu; Le-Hua Li; Mao-Sheng Fang; Hong-Geng Zhang; Shi-Ping Xie; Jian-Guo Shi; Bo Du; Xue-Qin Yuan; Jing-Ping Zhao
Journal:  Psychopharmacology (Berl)       Date:  2010-03-26       Impact factor: 4.530

Review 3.  Escitalopram: a review of its use in the management of major depressive disorder.

Authors:  David Murdoch; Susan J Keam
Journal:  Drugs       Date:  2005       Impact factor: 9.546

Review 4.  Escitalopram: a review of its use in the management of major depressive disorder in adults.

Authors:  Karly P Garnock-Jones; Paul L McCormack
Journal:  CNS Drugs       Date:  2010-09       Impact factor: 5.749

5.  Duloxetine in practice-based clinical settings: assessing effects on the emotional and physical symptoms of depression in an open-label, multicenter study.

Authors:  Madelaine M Wohlreich; Curtis G Wiltse; Durisala Desaiah; Wenyu Ye; Rebecca L Robinson; Kurt Kroenke; Susan G Kornstein; John H Greist
Journal:  Prim Care Companion J Clin Psychiatry       Date:  2007

6.  Disability in patients consulting for anxiety or mood disorders in primary care: response to antidepressant treatment.

Authors:  Alain Gérard; François Liard; Anne Crochard; Sylvia Goni; Bruno Millet
Journal:  Neuropsychiatr Dis Treat       Date:  2012-12-13       Impact factor: 2.570

Review 7.  Escitalopram--translating molecular properties into clinical benefit: reviewing the evidence in major depression.

Authors:  Brian Leonard; David Taylor
Journal:  J Psychopharmacol       Date:  2010-02-10       Impact factor: 4.153

  7 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.