Literature DB >> 1578592

Efficacy of whole-cell pertussis vaccine in preschool children in the United States.

I M Onorato1, S G Wassilak, B Meade.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the efficacy of currently used whole-cell pertussis vaccines.
DESIGN: Active surveillance to detect pertussis cases in Baltimore, Md, Denver, Colo, and Milwaukee, Wis, and investigation of secondary attack rates in 347 household contacts, aged 1 through 4 years, to estimate vaccine efficacy. OUTCOME MEASURE: Vaccine efficacy was estimated using different case definitions for pertussis.
RESULTS: Vaccine efficacy was 64%, 81%, and 95% for case definitions of mild cough, paroxysmal cough, and severe clinical illness, respectively. Requiring laboratory confirmation increased efficacy to 95% to 98% for culture-positive children and to 77% to 95% for culture- or serology-confirmed cases, depending on disease severity. Vaccine efficacy for typical paroxysmal cough increased from 44% for one diphtheria, tetanus, and pertussis vaccine dose to 80% for four or more doses.
CONCLUSIONS: The trend toward increasing vaccine efficacy with different case definitions may be due to improved efficacy in preventing severe illness and to case definitions that are more specific for pertussis. Whole-cell pertussis vaccine was highly effective in preventing pertussis in preschool children exposed to infection within their households. Direct side-by-side efficacy studies of whole-cell vaccine and the recently licensed acellular vaccine will be necessary to assure that comparable protection is afforded by the new vaccines if they are to be used for immunization of infants.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  1992        PMID: 1578592

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  JAMA        ISSN: 0098-7484            Impact factor:   56.272


  14 in total

Review 1.  Pharmacoeconomics of immunisation: a review.

Authors:  R van den Oever; D de Graeve; B Hepp; A Stroobant; D Walckiers; V Van Casteren; F Van Loock; G Ducoffre; J Dewatripont; P Jacques
Journal:  Pharmacoeconomics       Date:  1993-04       Impact factor: 4.981

2.  Toward safer and more efficient pertussis vaccines.

Authors:  A Wegmann; R Glück
Journal:  Eur J Pediatr       Date:  1996-02       Impact factor: 3.183

Review 3.  Licensed pertussis vaccines in the United States. History and current state.

Authors:  Nicola P Klein
Journal:  Hum Vaccin Immunother       Date:  2014-11-06       Impact factor: 3.452

Review 4.  Pertussis vaccine trials in the 1990s.

Authors:  Linda C Lambert
Journal:  J Infect Dis       Date:  2014-04-01       Impact factor: 5.226

Review 5.  Molecular pathogenesis, epidemiology, and clinical manifestations of respiratory infections due to Bordetella pertussis and other Bordetella subspecies.

Authors:  Seema Mattoo; James D Cherry
Journal:  Clin Microbiol Rev       Date:  2005-04       Impact factor: 26.132

6.  Statement on pertussis immunization. National Advisory Committee on Immunization.

Authors: 
Journal:  CMAJ       Date:  1993-10-15       Impact factor: 8.262

Review 7.  Acellular pertussis vaccines.

Authors:  E Miller
Journal:  Arch Dis Child       Date:  1995-11       Impact factor: 3.791

8.  Major outbreak of pertussis in northern Alberta, Canada: analysis of discrepant direct fluorescent-antibody and culture results by using polymerase chain reaction methodology.

Authors:  C A Ewanowich; L W Chui; M G Paranchych; M S Peppler; R G Marusyk; W L Albritton
Journal:  J Clin Microbiol       Date:  1993-07       Impact factor: 5.948

Review 9.  Which strategy for pertussis vaccination today?

Authors:  Dorota Z Girard
Journal:  Paediatr Drugs       Date:  2002       Impact factor: 3.022

Review 10.  Pertussis: Microbiology, Disease, Treatment, and Prevention.

Authors:  Paul E Kilgore; Abdulbaset M Salim; Marcus J Zervos; Heinz-Josef Schmitt
Journal:  Clin Microbiol Rev       Date:  2016-07       Impact factor: 26.132

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.