OBJECTIVE: To determine whether Alzheimer's disease (AD) is associated with preferential atrophy of either the left or right hippocampus. METHODS: We examined right-left asymmetry in hippocampal volume and atrophy rates in 32 subjects with probable AD and 50 age-matched controls. Hippocampi were measured on two serial volumetric MRI scans using a technique that minimizes laterality bias. RESULTS: We found a non-significant trend for right > left (R > L) asymmetry in controls at both time points (R > L: 1.7%; CI: -0.3-3.7%; p = 0.1). AD subjects showed a similar non-significant trend for R > L asymmetry at baseline (R > L: 1.8%; CI: -1.9-5.5%; p = 0.32), but not at repeat (p = 0.739). Change in R/L ratio between visits in AD patients was significant (p = 0.02). The AD group had significantly higher variance in these ratios than the controls at baseline (p = 0.02), but not repeat (p = 0.06). AD patients had higher atrophy rates than controls (p < 0.001). Mean (CI) annualized atrophy rates for left and right hippocampi were 1.2% (0.5-1.8%) and 1.1% (0.5-1.8%) for the controls, and 4.6% (3.3-6.0%) and 6.3% (4.9-7.8%) for AD subjects. There was no significant asymmetry in atrophy rates in controls (p = 0.9), but borderline significantly higher atrophy rates in the right hippocampus of the AD group (p = 0.05) compared to the left. Presence of an APOEepsilon4 allele had no significant effect on the size, asymmetry or atrophy rates in AD (p > 0.20). CONCLUSIONS: We report minor R > L asymmetry in hippocampal volumes in controls and present some evidence to suggest that there is a change in the natural R > L asymmetry during the progression of AD.
OBJECTIVE: To determine whether Alzheimer's disease (AD) is associated with preferential atrophy of either the left or right hippocampus. METHODS: We examined right-left asymmetry in hippocampal volume and atrophy rates in 32 subjects with probable AD and 50 age-matched controls. Hippocampi were measured on two serial volumetric MRI scans using a technique that minimizes laterality bias. RESULTS: We found a non-significant trend for right > left (R > L) asymmetry in controls at both time points (R > L: 1.7%; CI: -0.3-3.7%; p = 0.1). AD subjects showed a similar non-significant trend for R > L asymmetry at baseline (R > L: 1.8%; CI: -1.9-5.5%; p = 0.32), but not at repeat (p = 0.739). Change in R/L ratio between visits in AD patients was significant (p = 0.02). The AD group had significantly higher variance in these ratios than the controls at baseline (p = 0.02), but not repeat (p = 0.06). AD patients had higher atrophy rates than controls (p < 0.001). Mean (CI) annualized atrophy rates for left and right hippocampi were 1.2% (0.5-1.8%) and 1.1% (0.5-1.8%) for the controls, and 4.6% (3.3-6.0%) and 6.3% (4.9-7.8%) for AD subjects. There was no significant asymmetry in atrophy rates in controls (p = 0.9), but borderline significantly higher atrophy rates in the right hippocampus of the AD group (p = 0.05) compared to the left. Presence of an APOEepsilon4 allele had no significant effect on the size, asymmetry or atrophy rates in AD (p > 0.20). CONCLUSIONS: We report minor R > L asymmetry in hippocampal volumes in controls and present some evidence to suggest that there is a change in the natural R > L asymmetry during the progression of AD.
Authors: Klaus H Fritzsche; Bram Stieltjes; Sarah Schlindwein; Thomas van Bruggen; Marco Essig; Hans-Peter Meinzer Journal: Int J Comput Assist Radiol Surg Date: 2010-05-04 Impact factor: 2.924
Authors: D F Tate; E S Neeley; M C Norton; J T Tschanz; M J Miller; L Wolfson; C Hulette; C Leslie; K A Welsh-Bohmer; B Plassman; Erin D Bigler Journal: Brain Res Date: 2010-12-21 Impact factor: 3.252
Authors: Josephine Barnes; Jonathan W Bartlett; Laura A van de Pol; Clement T Loy; Rachael I Scahill; Chris Frost; Paul Thompson; Nick C Fox Journal: Neurobiol Aging Date: 2008-03-17 Impact factor: 4.673
Authors: Elvan Ceyhan; Mirza Faisal Beg; Can Ceritoğlu; Lei Wang; John C Morris; John G Csernansky; Michael I Miller; J Tilak Ratnanather Journal: Curr Alzheimer Res Date: 2012-10 Impact factor: 3.498
Authors: Christine Fennema-Notestine; Linda K McEvoy; Donald J Hagler; Mark W Jacobson; Anders M Dale Journal: Behav Neurol Date: 2009 Impact factor: 3.342
Authors: Christine Fennema-Notestine; Donald J Hagler; Linda K McEvoy; Adam S Fleisher; Elaine H Wu; David S Karow; Anders M Dale Journal: Hum Brain Mapp Date: 2009-10 Impact factor: 5.038