Literature DB >> 15784872

Thiopurine methyltransferase (TPMT) genotype and early treatment response to mercaptopurine in childhood acute lymphoblastic leukemia.

Martin Stanulla1, Elke Schaeffeler, Thomas Flohr, Gunnar Cario, André Schrauder, Martin Zimmermann, Karl Welte, Wolf-Dieter Ludwig, Claus R Bartram, Ulrich M Zanger, Michel Eichelbaum, Martin Schrappe, Matthias Schwab.   

Abstract

CONTEXT: Early response to multiagent chemotherapy, including mercaptopurine, as measured by minimal residual disease is an important prognostic factor for children with acute lymphoblastic leukemia (ALL). Thiopurine methyltransferase (TPMT) is involved in the metabolism of mercaptopurine and subject to genetic polymorphism, with heterozygous individuals having intermediate and homozygous mutant individuals having very low TPMT activity.
OBJECTIVE: To assess the association of TPMT genotype with minimal residual disease load before and after treatment with mercaptopurine in the early treatment course of childhood ALL. DESIGN, SETTING, AND PATIENTS: TPMT genotyping of childhood ALL patients (n = 814) in Germany consecutively enrolled in the ALL-BFM (Berlin-Frankfurt-Münster) 2000 study from October 1999 to September 2002. Minimal residual disease was analyzed on treatment days 33 and 78 for risk-adapted treatment stratification. A 4-week cycle of mercaptopurine was administered between these 2 minimal residual disease measurements. Patients (n = 4) homozygous for a mutant TPMT allele, and consequently deficient in TPMT activity, were treated with reduced doses of mercaptopurine and, therefore, not included in the analyses. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: Minimal residual disease load before (day 33) and after (day 78) mercaptopurine treatment. Loads smaller than 10(-4) were defined as negative.
RESULTS: Patients (n = 55) heterozygous for allelic variants of TPMT conferring lower enzyme activity had a significantly lower rate of minimal residual disease positivity (9.1%) compared with patients (n = 755) with homozygous wild-type alleles (22.8%) on day 78 (P = .02). This translated into a 2.9-fold reduction in risk for patients with wild-type heterozygous alleles (relative risk, 0.34; 95% confidence interval, 0.13-0.86).
CONCLUSIONS: TPMT genotype has a substantial impact on minimal residual disease after administration of mercaptopurine in the early course of childhood ALL, most likely through modulation of mercaptopurine dose intensity. Our findings support a role for minimal residual disease analyses in the assessment of genotype-phenotype associations in multiagent chemotherapeutic trials.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2005        PMID: 15784872     DOI: 10.1001/jama.293.12.1485

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  JAMA        ISSN: 0098-7484            Impact factor:   56.272


  69 in total

Review 1.  Part 1: background, methodology, and clinical adoption of pharmacogenetics.

Authors:  Maarten J Deenen; Annemieke Cats; Jos H Beijnen; Jan H M Schellens
Journal:  Oncologist       Date:  2011-05-31

Review 2.  Pediatric pharmacogenetic and pharmacogenomic studies: the current state and future perspectives.

Authors:  Roberta Russo; Mario Capasso; Paolo Paolucci; Achille Iolascon
Journal:  Eur J Clin Pharmacol       Date:  2010-11-11       Impact factor: 2.953

Review 3.  Patient profiling for treatment toxicity: potential use of clinical and genomic factors.

Authors:  Terri S Armstrong; Mark R Gilbert
Journal:  Curr Oncol Rep       Date:  2011-02       Impact factor: 5.075

Review 4.  Pharmacogenetics of drug metabolizing enzymes and transporters: effects on pharmacokinetics and pharmacodynamics of anticancer agents.

Authors:  Norman H Lee
Journal:  Anticancer Agents Med Chem       Date:  2010-10-01       Impact factor: 2.505

5.  Epistatic interactions between thiopurine methyltransferase (TPMT) and inosine triphosphate pyrophosphatase (ITPA) variations determine 6-mercaptopurine toxicity in Indian children with acute lymphoblastic leukemia.

Authors:  Patchva Dorababu; Narayana Nagesh; Vijay Gandhi Linga; Sadashivudu Gundeti; Vijay Kumar Kutala; Pallu Reddanna; Raghunadharao Digumarti
Journal:  Eur J Clin Pharmacol       Date:  2011-10-19       Impact factor: 2.953

Review 6.  Pharmacogenomics: challenges and opportunities.

Authors:  Dan M Roden; Russ B Altman; Neal L Benowitz; David A Flockhart; Kathleen M Giacomini; Julie A Johnson; Ronald M Krauss; Howard L McLeod; Mark J Ratain; Mary V Relling; Huijun Z Ring; Alan R Shuldiner; Richard M Weinshilboum; Scott T Weiss
Journal:  Ann Intern Med       Date:  2006-11-21       Impact factor: 25.391

7.  Genome-wide interrogation of germline genetic variation associated with treatment response in childhood acute lymphoblastic leukemia.

Authors:  Jun J Yang; Cheng Cheng; Wenjian Yang; Deqing Pei; Xueyuan Cao; Yiping Fan; Stanley B Pounds; Geoffrey Neale; Lisa R Treviño; Deborah French; Dario Campana; James R Downing; William E Evans; Ching-Hon Pui; Meenakshi Devidas; W P Bowman; Bruce M Camitta; Cheryl L Willman; Stella M Davies; Michael J Borowitz; William L Carroll; Stephen P Hunger; Mary V Relling
Journal:  JAMA       Date:  2009-01-28       Impact factor: 56.272

8.  Comparative pharmacogenetic analysis of risk polymorphisms in Caucasian and Vietnamese children with acute lymphoblastic leukemia: prediction of therapeutic outcome?

Authors:  Phuong Thu Vu Hoang; Jérôme Ambroise; Anne-France Dekairelle; Jean-François Durant; Valentina Butoescu; Vu Luan Dang Chi; Nghia Huynh; Tan Binh Nguyen; Annie Robert; Christiane Vermylen; Jean-Luc Gala
Journal:  Br J Clin Pharmacol       Date:  2015-03       Impact factor: 4.335

Review 9.  Pharmacogenetics and pharmacogenomics of anticancer agents.

Authors:  R Stephanie Huang; Mark J Ratain
Journal:  CA Cancer J Clin       Date:  2009 Jan-Feb       Impact factor: 508.702

Review 10.  High-risk childhood acute lymphoblastic leukemia.

Authors:  Deepa Bhojwani; Scott C Howard; Ching-Hon Pui
Journal:  Clin Lymphoma Myeloma       Date:  2009
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.