Literature DB >> 15784769

Tissue-mimicking liquid for use in exposimetry.

Timothy A Stiles1, Ernest L Madsen, Gary R Frank, Thomas Diehl, John A Lucey.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: Current determinations of diagnostic ultrasound exposure parameters (eg, peak rarefactional pressure and pulse intensity integral) are intended to correspond to propagation through soft tissue with a propagation speed of 1540 m/s and attenuation of 0.3 dB x cm(-1) x MHz(-1). These current measurements are made in water, which has very little attenuation, and a linear derating factor is applied to approximate 0.3 dB x cm(-1) x MHz(-1) attenuation. The fact that propagation through water as well as through soft tissue involves nonlinear propagation is not directly addressed. A better way to determine exposure parameters would be to use a liquid that has the desired tissue-mimicking properties, including a value of the nonlinearity parameter B/A representative of soft tissue. To be of practical use in the laboratory, the ultrasonic properties of this liquid must remain stable and spatially uniform for many months or years without need for periodic mixing by the user.
METHODS: Fifty-two samples of fat-free milk that was concentrated to one third of its original volume by ultrafiltration were created. Each sample was preserved by a different method. The speed of sound, attenuation, and nonlinearity parameter B/A of each sample were periodically monitored by narrowband through-transmission techniques.
RESULTS: Six of the 52 samples remained liquid and retained acceptably stable acoustic properties over 22 months of storage at room temperature.
CONCLUSIONS: Fat-free milk, concentrated via ultrafiltration and preserved in 1 of 6 different methods, has been found to be a stable tissue-mimicking liquid with acoustic properties appropriate for use in exposimetry.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2005        PMID: 15784769     DOI: 10.7863/jum.2005.24.4.501

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Ultrasound Med        ISSN: 0278-4297            Impact factor:   2.153


  1 in total

1.  Interlaboratory comparison of backscatter coefficient estimates for tissue-mimicking phantoms.

Authors:  Janelle J Anderson; Maria-Teresa Herd; Michael R King; Alexander Haak; Zachary T Hafez; Jun Song; Michael L Oelze; Ernest L Madsen; James A Zagzebski; William D O'Brien; Timothy J Hall
Journal:  Ultrason Imaging       Date:  2010-01       Impact factor: 1.578

  1 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.