Clinical evaluation of mastication: validation of video versus electromyography.

BACKGROUNDS AND AIMS: The ability to evaluate masticatory function in people with neurological disabilities is important as this function is often compromised in these groups. However, current standard techniques are often impossible in such groups due to cognitive difficulties. This study is a validation of several variables read from standardised video recordings of mastication as indicators of masticatory function.
METHODS: Fifteen healthy, fully dentate male subjects were recorded using EMG and by video simultaneously. An evaluation was undertaken of the video parameters (i) to compare their validity against the electromyographic parameters, (ii) to test intra-rater and inter-rater reliability and (iii) to test the ability to discriminate between four model foods differing in hardness.
RESULTS: Masticatory time and the number of masticatory cycles counted on video were found to be valid and reliable indicators. In addition, the number of active chewing cycles performed with an open mouth and identification of the chewing side, were found to have reasonable validity and reliability. The former may allow discrimination between food types.
CONCLUSION: As an alternative to the complex evaluation of masticatory function, observation of certain parameters from video recording could be an alternative for use in uncooperative patients.