Literature DB >> 15784416

A comparison of random field theory and permutation methods for the statistical analysis of MEG data.

Dimitrios Pantazis1, Thomas E Nichols, Sylvain Baillet, Richard M Leahy.   

Abstract

We describe the use of random field and permutation methods to detect activation in cortically constrained maps of current density computed from MEG data. The methods are applicable to any inverse imaging method that maps event-related MEG to a coregistered cortical surface. These approaches also extend directly to images computed from event-related EEG data. We determine statistical thresholds that control the familywise error rate (FWER) across space or across both space and time. Both random field and permutation methods use the distribution of the maximum statistic under the null hypothesis to find FWER thresholds. The former methods make assumptions on the distribution and smoothness of the data and use approximate analytical solutions, the latter resample the data and rely on empirical distributions. Both methods account for spatial and temporal correlation in the cortical maps. Unlike previous nonparametric work in neuroimaging, we address the problem of nonuniform specificity that can arise without a Gaussianity assumption. We compare and evaluate the methods on simulated data and experimental data from a somatosensory-evoked response study. We find that the random field methods are conservative with or without smoothing, though with a 5 vertex FWHM smoothness, they are close to exact. Our permutation methods demonstrated exact specificity in simulation studies. In real data, the permutation method was not as sensitive as the RF method, although this could be due to violations of the random field theory assumptions.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2005        PMID: 15784416     DOI: 10.1016/j.neuroimage.2004.09.040

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Neuroimage        ISSN: 1053-8119            Impact factor:   6.556


  75 in total

1.  Simultaneous EEG and MEG source reconstruction in sparse electromagnetic source imaging.

Authors:  Lei Ding; Han Yuan
Journal:  Hum Brain Mapp       Date:  2011-11-18       Impact factor: 5.038

2.  Registration of cortical surfaces using sulcal landmarks for group analysis of MEG data.

Authors:  Anand A Joshi; David W Shattuck; Paul M Thompson; Richard M Leahy
Journal:  Int Congr Ser       Date:  2007-06-01

3.  Coherent neural representation of hand speed in humans revealed by MEG imaging.

Authors:  Karim Jerbi; Jean-Philippe Lachaux; Karim N'Diaye; Dimitrios Pantazis; Richard M Leahy; Line Garnero; Sylvain Baillet
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2007-04-18       Impact factor: 11.205

4.  A distributed spatio-temporal EEG/MEG inverse solver.

Authors:  Wanmei Ou; Matti S Hämäläinen; Polina Golland
Journal:  Neuroimage       Date:  2008-06-14       Impact factor: 6.556

5.  A distributed spatio-temporal EEG/MEG inverse solver.

Authors:  Wanmei Ou; Polina Golland; Matti Hämäläinen
Journal:  Med Image Comput Comput Assist Interv       Date:  2008

6.  Node accessibility in cortical networks during motor tasks.

Authors:  Mario Chavez; Fabrizio De Vico Fallani; Miguel Valencia; Julio Artieda; Donatella Mattia; Vito Latora; Fabio Babiloni
Journal:  Neuroinformatics       Date:  2013-07

7.  Automatic semantic facilitation in anterior temporal cortex revealed through multimodal neuroimaging.

Authors:  Ellen F Lau; Alexandre Gramfort; Matti S Hämäläinen; Gina R Kuperberg
Journal:  J Neurosci       Date:  2013-10-23       Impact factor: 6.167

8.  Nonlinear phase-phase cross-frequency coupling mediates communication between distant sites in human neocortex.

Authors:  Felix Darvas; Kai J Miller; Rajesh P N Rao; Jeffrey G Ojemann
Journal:  J Neurosci       Date:  2009-01-14       Impact factor: 6.167

9.  Sex-dependent association of common variants of microcephaly genes with brain structure.

Authors:  Lars M Rimol; Ingrid Agartz; Srdjan Djurovic; Andrew A Brown; J Cooper Roddey; Anna K Kähler; Morten Mattingsdal; Lavinia Athanasiu; Alexander H Joyner; Nicholas J Schork; Eric Halgren; Kjetil Sundet; Ingrid Melle; Anders M Dale; Ole A Andreassen
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2009-12-22       Impact factor: 11.205

10.  Sulcal set optimization for cortical surface registration.

Authors:  Anand A Joshi; Dimitrios Pantazis; Quanzheng Li; Hanna Damasio; David W Shattuck; Arthur W Toga; Richard M Leahy
Journal:  Neuroimage       Date:  2010-01-04       Impact factor: 6.556

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.