Literature DB >> 15784414

Investigations of dipole localization accuracy in MEG using the bootstrap.

F Darvas1, M Rautiainen, D Pantazis, S Baillet, H Benali, J C Mosher, L Garnero, R M Leahy.   

Abstract

We describe the use of the nonparametric bootstrap to investigate the accuracy of current dipole localization from magnetoencephalography (MEG) studies of event-related neural activity. The bootstrap is well suited to the analysis of event-related MEG data since the experiments are repeated tens or even hundreds of times and averaged to achieve acceptable signal-to-noise ratios (SNRs). The set of repetitions or epochs can be viewed as a set of independent realizations of the brain's response to the experiment. Bootstrap resamples can be generated by sampling with replacement from these epochs and averaging. In this study, we applied the bootstrap resampling technique to MEG data from somatotopic experimental and simulated data. Four fingers of the right and left hand of a healthy subject were electrically stimulated, and about 400 trials per stimulation were recorded and averaged in order to measure the somatotopic mapping of the fingers in the S1 area of the brain. Based on single-trial recordings for each finger we performed 5000 bootstrap resamples. We reconstructed dipoles from these resampled averages using the Recursively Applied and Projected (RAP)-MUSIC source localization algorithm. We also performed a simulation for two dipolar sources with overlapping time courses embedded in realistic background brain activity generated using the prestimulus segments of the somatotopic data. To find correspondences between multiple sources in each bootstrap, sample dipoles with similar time series and forward fields were assumed to represent the same source. These dipoles were then clustered by a Gaussian Mixture Model (GMM) clustering algorithm using their combined normalized time series and topographies as feature vectors. The mean and standard deviation of the dipole position and the dipole time series in each cluster were computed to provide estimates of the accuracy of the reconstructed source locations and time series.

Mesh:

Year:  2005        PMID: 15784414     DOI: 10.1016/j.neuroimage.2004.09.045

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Neuroimage        ISSN: 1053-8119            Impact factor:   6.556


  13 in total

1.  Decoding and cortical source localization for intended movement direction with MEG.

Authors:  Wei Wang; Gustavo P Sudre; Yang Xu; Robert E Kass; Jennifer L Collinger; Alan D Degenhart; Anto I Bagic; Douglas J Weber
Journal:  J Neurophysiol       Date:  2010-08-25       Impact factor: 2.714

2.  Spatial resolution of EEG cortical source imaging revealed by localization of retinotopic organization in human primary visual cortex.

Authors:  Chang-Hwan Im; Arvind Gururajan; Nanyin Zhang; Wei Chen; Bin He
Journal:  J Neurosci Methods       Date:  2006-11-13       Impact factor: 2.390

3.  Noise cancellation for a whole-head magnetometer-based MEG system in hospital environment.

Authors:  Limin Sun; Matti S Hämäläinen; Yoshio Okada
Journal:  Biomed Phys Eng Express       Date:  2018-08-07

4.  Perigenual anterior cingulate event-related potential precedes stop signal errors.

Authors:  Andrew Chang; Chien-Chung Chen; Hsin-Hung Li; Chiang-Shan R Li
Journal:  Neuroimage       Date:  2015-02-17       Impact factor: 6.556

5.  Head movements of children in MEG: quantification, effects on source estimation, and compensation.

Authors:  Daniel T Wehner; Matti S Hämäläinen; Maria Mody; Seppo P Ahlfors
Journal:  Neuroimage       Date:  2008-02-05       Impact factor: 6.556

6.  Electromagnetic correlates of musical expertise in processing of tone patterns.

Authors:  Anja Kuchenbuch; Evangelos Paraskevopoulos; Sibylle C Herholz; Christo Pantev
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2012-01-18       Impact factor: 3.240

7.  GALA: group analysis leads to accuracy, a novel approach for solving the inverse problem in exploratory analysis of group MEG recordings.

Authors:  Vladimir V Kozunov; Alexei Ossadtchi
Journal:  Front Neurosci       Date:  2015-04-21       Impact factor: 4.677

8.  Plasticity in neuromagnetic cortical responses suggests enhanced auditory object representation.

Authors:  Bernhard Ross; Shahab Jamali; Kelly L Tremblay
Journal:  BMC Neurosci       Date:  2013-12-05       Impact factor: 3.288

9.  Effects of musical training and event probabilities on encoding of complex tone patterns.

Authors:  Anja Kuchenbuch; Evangelos Paraskevopoulos; Sibylle C Herholz; Christo Pantev
Journal:  BMC Neurosci       Date:  2013-04-24       Impact factor: 3.288

10.  Good practice for conducting and reporting MEG research.

Authors:  Joachim Gross; Sylvain Baillet; Gareth R Barnes; Richard N Henson; Arjan Hillebrand; Ole Jensen; Karim Jerbi; Vladimir Litvak; Burkhard Maess; Robert Oostenveld; Lauri Parkkonen; Jason R Taylor; Virginie van Wassenhove; Michael Wibral; Jan-Mathijs Schoffelen
Journal:  Neuroimage       Date:  2012-10-06       Impact factor: 6.556

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.