Literature DB >> 15784372

Does a thoracic epidural confer any additional benefit following video-assisted thoracoscopic pleurectomy for primary spontaneous pneumothorax?

Marta I Fernandez1, Antonio E Martin-Ucar, H D Lee, Kevin J West, Richard Wyatt, David A Waller.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: Video-assisted thoracoscopic (VATS) bullectomy and apical pleurectomy has become the preferred procedure for recurrent or complicated primary spontaneous pneumothorax (SPN). Although thoracic epidural analgesia is the gold standard after open thoracic surgical procedures, its use in the management of minimally invasive procedures in this young population has not been extensively studied.
METHODS: From 1997 to 2003, a single surgeon performed 118 consecutive VATS pleurectomies for primary SPN. The perioperative course, analgesic requirements, hospital stay and long-term complications were compared for 22 (18%) patients in whom a patient-controlled thoracic epidural was used for analgesia and 96 (82%) patients who did not receive an epidural (parenteral opioids). A four-point verbal pain score (0-3) was recorded hourly in every patient at rest and on coughing following surgery.
RESULTS: One patient required additional surgery for evacuation of haemothorax. There were no mortalities or other major complications in the series. Overall median hospital stay was 3 (range 1-10) days, the incidence of long-term pain at 3 months was 6%, and the long-term recurrence rate was 3%. Despite parenteral opioids being discontinued significantly earlier than epidurals, pain scores were similar in both groups. There were no significant differences in the duration of air-leaks, length of drainage, hospital stay, long-term pain and long-term paraesthesias between the two groups.
CONCLUSIONS: Thoracic epidural analgesia does not contribute significantly to minimize neither perioperative nor long-term pain after VATS pleurectomy for primary SPN. The additional resource requirement in these patients is not justified.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2005        PMID: 15784372     DOI: 10.1016/j.ejcts.2004.12.045

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Eur J Cardiothorac Surg        ISSN: 1010-7940            Impact factor:   4.191


  5 in total

1.  Minimally invasive versus open oesophagectomy for patients with oesophageal cancer: a multicentre, open-label, randomised controlled trial.

Authors:  Omar Khan; Shiyam Nizar; Georgios Vasilikostas; Andrew Wan
Journal:  J Thorac Dis       Date:  2012-10       Impact factor: 2.895

2.  Pain control of thoracoscopic major pulmonary resection: is pre-emptive local bupivacaine injection able to replace the intravenous patient controlled analgesia?

Authors:  Hee Chul Yang; Ja-Young Lee; Soyeon Ahn; Sukki Cho; Kwhanmien Kim; Sanghoon Jheon; Jun Sung Kim
Journal:  J Thorac Dis       Date:  2015-11       Impact factor: 2.895

Review 3.  Integrative Approaches to Minimize Peri-operative Symptoms.

Authors:  Fahad Faruqi; Kathryn J Ruddy; Shanda Blackmon
Journal:  Curr Oncol Rep       Date:  2021-04-28       Impact factor: 5.075

4.  Comparison between intrathecal morphine and intravenous patient control analgesia for pain control after video-assisted thoracoscopic surgery: A pilot randomized controlled study.

Authors:  Amorn Vijitpavan; Nussara Kittikunakorn; Rojnarin Komonhirun
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2022-04-06       Impact factor: 3.240

5.  Is intravenous patient controlled analgesia enough for pain control in patients who underwent thoracoscopy?

Authors:  Jie Ae Kim; Tae Hyeong Kim; Mikyung Yang; Mi Sook Gwak; Gaab Soo Kim; Myung Joo Kim; Hyun Sung Cho; Woo Seok Sim
Journal:  J Korean Med Sci       Date:  2009-09-23       Impact factor: 2.153

  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.