OBJECTIVE: To assess the impact of documented and clinically suspected bacterial infection precipitating ICU admission on in-hospital mortality in patients with hematological malignancies. DESIGN AND SETTING: Prospective observational study in a 14-bed medical ICU at a tertiary university hospital. PATIENTS: A total of 172 consecutive patients with hematological malignancies admitted to the ICU for a life-threatening complication over a 4-year period were categorized into three main groups according to their admission diagnosis (documented bacterial infection, clinically suspected bacterial infection, nonbacterial complications) by an independent panel of three physicians blinded to the patient's outcome and C-reactive protein levels. RESULTS: In-hospital and 6-months mortality rates in documented bacterial infection (n=42), clinically suspected bacterial infection (n=40) vs. nonbacterial complications (n=90) were 50.0% and 42.5% vs. 65.6% (p=0.09 and 0.02) and 56.1% and 48.7% vs. 72.1% (p=0.11 and 0.02), respectively. Median baseline C-reactive protein levels in the first two groups were 23 mg/dl and 21.5 mg/dl vs. 10.7 mg/dl (p<0.001 and p=0.001) respectively. After adjustment for the severity of critical and underlying hematological illness and the duration of hospitalization before admission documented (OR 0.20; 95% CI 0.06-0.62, p=0.006) and clinically suspected bacterial infection (OR 0.18; 95% CI 0.06-0.53, p=0.002) were associated with a more favorable outcome than nonbacterial complications. CONCLUSIONS: Severely ill patients with hematological malignancies admitted to the ICU because of documented or clinically suspected bacterial infection have a better outcome than those admitted with nonbacterial complications. These patients should receive advanced life-supporting therapy for an appropriate period of time.
OBJECTIVE: To assess the impact of documented and clinically suspected bacterial infection precipitating ICU admission on in-hospital mortality in patients with hematological malignancies. DESIGN AND SETTING: Prospective observational study in a 14-bed medical ICU at a tertiary university hospital. PATIENTS: A total of 172 consecutive patients with hematological malignancies admitted to the ICU for a life-threatening complication over a 4-year period were categorized into three main groups according to their admission diagnosis (documented bacterial infection, clinically suspected bacterial infection, nonbacterial complications) by an independent panel of three physicians blinded to the patient's outcome and C-reactive protein levels. RESULTS: In-hospital and 6-months mortality rates in documented bacterial infection (n=42), clinically suspected bacterial infection (n=40) vs. nonbacterial complications (n=90) were 50.0% and 42.5% vs. 65.6% (p=0.09 and 0.02) and 56.1% and 48.7% vs. 72.1% (p=0.11 and 0.02), respectively. Median baseline C-reactive protein levels in the first two groups were 23 mg/dl and 21.5 mg/dl vs. 10.7 mg/dl (p<0.001 and p=0.001) respectively. After adjustment for the severity of critical and underlying hematological illness and the duration of hospitalization before admission documented (OR 0.20; 95% CI 0.06-0.62, p=0.006) and clinically suspected bacterial infection (OR 0.18; 95% CI 0.06-0.53, p=0.002) were associated with a more favorable outcome than nonbacterial complications. CONCLUSIONS: Severely ill patients with hematological malignancies admitted to the ICU because of documented or clinically suspected bacterial infection have a better outcome than those admitted with nonbacterial complications. These patients should receive advanced life-supporting therapy for an appropriate period of time.
Authors: Walter T Hughes; Donald Armstrong; Gerald P Bodey; Eric J Bow; Arthur E Brown; Thierry Calandra; Ronald Feld; Philip A Pizzo; Kenneth V I Rolston; Jerry L Shenep; Lowell S Young Journal: Clin Infect Dis Date: 2002-02-13 Impact factor: 9.079
Authors: F Brunet; J J Lanore; J F Dhainaut; F Dreyfus; J F Vaxelaire; S Nouira; T Giraud; A Armaganidis; J F Monsallier Journal: Intensive Care Med Date: 1990 Impact factor: 17.440
Authors: M E Santolaya; A M Alvarez; A Becker; J Cofré; N Enríquez; M O'Ryan; E Payá; J Pilorget; C Salgado; J Tordecilla; M Varas; M Villarroel; T Viviani; M Zubieta Journal: J Clin Oncol Date: 2001-07-15 Impact factor: 44.544
Authors: Dominique D Benoit; Koenraad H Vandewoude; Johan M Decruyenaere; Eric A Hoste; Francis A Colardyn Journal: Crit Care Med Date: 2003-01 Impact factor: 7.598
Authors: Peter Andrews; Elie Azoulay; Massimo Antonelli; Laurent Brochard; Christian Brun-Buisson; Geoffrey Dobb; Jean-Yves Fagon; Herwig Gerlach; Johan Groeneveld; Jordi Mancebo; Philipp Metnitz; Stefano Nava; Jerome Pugin; Michael Pinsky; Peter Radermacher; Christian Richard; Robert Tasker Journal: Intensive Care Med Date: 2006-02-17 Impact factor: 17.440
Authors: Dominique D Benoit; Pieter O Depuydt; Koenraad H Vandewoude; Fritz C Offner; Tom Boterberg; Carole A De Cock; Lucien A Noens; Ann M Janssens; Johan M Decruyenaere Journal: Intensive Care Med Date: 2005-11-25 Impact factor: 17.440
Authors: Jared A Greenberg; Michael Z David; Matthew M Churpek; David L Pitrak; Jesse B Hall; John P Kress Journal: Am J Crit Care Date: 2016-09 Impact factor: 2.228
Authors: Dominique M Vandijck; Dominique D Benoit; Pieter O Depuydt; Fritz C Offner; Stijn I Blot; Anna K Van Tilborgh; Joke Nollet; Eva Steel; Lucien A Noens; Johan M Decruyenaere Journal: Intensive Care Med Date: 2008-01-24 Impact factor: 17.440
Authors: Dominique M Vandijck; Pieter O Depuydt; Fritz C Offner; Joke Nollet; Renaat A Peleman; Eva Steel; Lucien A Noens; Johan M Decruyenaere; Dominique D Benoit Journal: Intensive Care Med Date: 2010-05-18 Impact factor: 17.440
Authors: T Verplancke; S Van Looy; D Benoit; S Vansteelandt; P Depuydt; F De Turck; J Decruyenaere Journal: BMC Med Inform Decis Mak Date: 2008-12-05 Impact factor: 2.796