Literature DB >> 15782273

Risk-adjusted analysis of outcomes following elective open abdominal aortic aneurysm repair.

Thomas L Forbes1, Stefan H Steiner, D Kirk Lawlor, Guy DeRose, Kenneth A Harris.   

Abstract

The purpose of this study was to describe a method to analyze outcomes following open abdominal aortic aneurysm (AAA) repair while considering the variability in patients' preoperative risk. Consecutive patients undergoing elective open infrarenal AAA repair during a 4-year period (2000-2003) were reviewed. Thirty-day or in-hospital mortality was the major outcome variable. Preoperative mortality risk was estimated for each patient using a validated scoring system that considers age, renal dysfunction, and coronary artery and cerebrovascular disease. A risk-adjusted cumulative sum method was used to compare observed versus predicted outcomes by assigning a risk-adjusted score, based on log-likelihood ratios, to each patient. These cumulative scores were sequentially plotted with preset control limits to allow for "signaling" when results were substantially different than expected (doubling or halving of odds ratios). Four hundred and sixty-three patients were studied with an overall early mortality rate of 4.5% (n = 21). Patients were allocated to three different preoperative risk groups (low, n = 89; medium, n = 160; high, n = 214) according to a medical comorbidity-based scoring system. Predicted (P) and observed (O) mortality rates for each group were as follows: low, 2.4% (P) and 2.2% (O); medium, 4.1% (P) and 4.4% (O); high, 9.3% (P) and 5.6% (O). The resulting risk-adjusted scores for each patient were plotted sequentially. This plot was flat for the first year and then adopted a negative slope crossing the lower control limit after 266 patients, indicating improved results compared to those expected. This coincided with the adoption of routine intraoperative cell saver use in our practice. This form of analysis allows for the prospective evaluation of results while considering patient-mix variabilities.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2005        PMID: 15782273     DOI: 10.1007/s10016-004-0158-7

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Ann Vasc Surg        ISSN: 0890-5096            Impact factor:   1.466


  4 in total

Review 1.  Elective surgery for aortic abdominal aneurysm: comparison of English outcomes with those elsewhere.

Authors:  Miodrag Filipovic; Michael J Goldacre; Leicester Gill
Journal:  J Epidemiol Community Health       Date:  2007-03       Impact factor: 3.710

2.  CUSUM analysis of J-pouch surgery reflects no learning curve after board certification.

Authors:  Patrick H D Colquhoun
Journal:  Can J Surg       Date:  2008-08       Impact factor: 2.089

3.  Defining high-risk patients for endovascular aneurysm repair.

Authors:  Natalia Egorova; Jeannine K Giacovelli; Annetine Gelijns; Giampaolo Greco; Alan Moskowitz; James McKinsey; K Craig Kent
Journal:  J Vasc Surg       Date:  2009-09-26       Impact factor: 4.268

Review 4.  Systematic methods for measuring outcomes: How they may be used to improve outcomes after Radical cystectomy.

Authors:  Khurram M Siddiqui; Jonathan I Izawa
Journal:  Arab J Urol       Date:  2015-03-29
  4 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.