Literature DB >> 15782221

Quantification of random genomic mutations.

Jason H Bielas1, Lawrence A Loeb.   

Abstract

Cancer cells contain numerous clonal mutations. It has been theorized that malignant cells sustain an elevated mutation rate and, as a consequence, harbor yet larger numbers of random point mutations. Testing this hypothesis has been precluded by lack of an assay to measure random mutations-that is, mutations that occur in only one or a few cells of a population. We have established a method that has permitted us to detect and identify rare random mutations in human cells, at a frequency of 1 per 10(8) base pairs. The assay is based on gene capture, by hybridization with a uracil-containing probe, followed by magnetic separation. Mutations that render the mutational target sequence non-cleavable by a restriction enzyme are quantified by dilution to single molecules and real-time quantitative PCR amplification. The assay can be extended to quantify mutation in any DNA-based organism, at different sites in the genome, in introns and exons, in unselected and selected genes, and in proliferating and quiescent cells.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2005        PMID: 15782221     DOI: 10.1038/nmeth751

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Nat Methods        ISSN: 1548-7091            Impact factor:   28.547


  44 in total

Review 1.  Measuring genome instability in aging - a mini-review.

Authors:  Wenge Li; Jan Vijg
Journal:  Gerontology       Date:  2011-12-10       Impact factor: 5.140

Review 2.  The influence of subclonal resistance mutations on targeted cancer therapy.

Authors:  Michael W Schmitt; Lawrence A Loeb; Jesse J Salk
Journal:  Nat Rev Clin Oncol       Date:  2015-10-20       Impact factor: 66.675

3.  Random mutations, selected mutations: A PIN opens the door to new genetic landscapes.

Authors:  Christoph A Klein
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2006-11-20       Impact factor: 11.205

4.  C/EBPα expression is downregulated in human nonmelanoma skin cancers and inactivation of C/EBPα confers susceptibility to UVB-induced skin squamous cell carcinomas.

Authors:  Elizabeth A Thompson; Songyun Zhu; Jonathan R Hall; John S House; Rakesh Ranjan; Jeanne A Burr; Yu-Ying He; David M Owens; Robert C Smart
Journal:  J Invest Dermatol       Date:  2011-02-24       Impact factor: 8.551

5.  Detection and quantification of rare mutations with massively parallel sequencing.

Authors:  Isaac Kinde; Jian Wu; Nick Papadopoulos; Kenneth W Kinzler; Bert Vogelstein
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2011-05-17       Impact factor: 11.205

6.  Single molecule molecular inversion probes for targeted, high-accuracy detection of low-frequency variation.

Authors:  Joseph B Hiatt; Colin C Pritchard; Stephen J Salipante; Brian J O'Roak; Jay Shendure
Journal:  Genome Res       Date:  2013-02-04       Impact factor: 9.043

7.  Single molecule PCR in mtDNA mutational analysis: Genuine mutations vs. damage bypass-derived artifacts.

Authors:  Y Kraytsberg; A Nicholas; P Caro; K Khrapko
Journal:  Methods       Date:  2008-10-26       Impact factor: 3.608

Review 8.  Do mutator mutations fuel tumorigenesis?

Authors:  Edward J Fox; Marc J Prindle; Lawrence A Loeb
Journal:  Cancer Metastasis Rev       Date:  2013-12       Impact factor: 9.264

9.  Stochastic drift in mitochondrial DNA point mutations: a novel perspective ex silico.

Authors:  Suresh Kumar Poovathingal; Jan Gruber; Barry Halliwell; Rudiyanto Gunawan
Journal:  PLoS Comput Biol       Date:  2009-11-20       Impact factor: 4.475

10.  Ultradeep sequencing of a human ultraconserved region reveals somatic and constitutional genomic instability.

Authors:  Anna De Grassi; Cinzia Segala; Fabio Iannelli; Sara Volorio; Lucio Bertario; Paolo Radice; Loris Bernard; Francesca D Ciccarelli
Journal:  PLoS Biol       Date:  2010-01-05       Impact factor: 8.029

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.