Literature DB >> 1578213

Skin damage associated with the Norplant contraceptive.

T J Zuber1, D E DeWitt, D D Patton.   

Abstract

Three cases of localized skin reaction in the first month after implantation of the Norplant contraceptive resulted in a partial implant expulsion and removal in one patient, and implant removal in another. Clinical evidence of infection was absent in all patients. While lidocaine with epinephrine was used in all three patients, the cause for these skin reactions remains unclear. Physicians should be alerted to the possibility of significant skin reactions associated with this procedure.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  1992        PMID: 1578213

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Fam Pract        ISSN: 0094-3509            Impact factor:   0.493


  5 in total

1.  Mycobacterium abscessus infection of a Norplant contraceptive implant site.

Authors:  M J Alfa; J J Sisler; G K Harding
Journal:  CMAJ       Date:  1995-11-01       Impact factor: 8.262

Review 2.  Levonorgestrel subdermal implants. Contraception on trial.

Authors:  M L Frank; C DiMaria
Journal:  Drug Saf       Date:  1997-12       Impact factor: 5.606

Review 3.  Levonorgestrel subdermal implants. A review of contraceptive efficacy and acceptability.

Authors:  A J Coukell; J A Balfour
Journal:  Drugs       Date:  1998-06       Impact factor: 9.546

Review 4.  Complications of Subcutaneous Contraception: A Review.

Authors:  Rebecca C Ramdhan; Emily Simonds; Charlotte Wilson; Marios Loukas; Rod J Oskouian; R Shane Tubbs
Journal:  Cureus       Date:  2018-01-31

5.  Phase 3 Trial of a Small-volume Subcutaneous 6-Month Duration Leuprolide Acetate Treatment for Central Precocious Puberty.

Authors:  Karen O Klein; Analía Freire; Mirta Graciela Gryngarten; Gad B Kletter; Matthew Benson; Bradley S Miller; Tala S Dajani; Erica A Eugster; Nelly Mauras
Journal:  J Clin Endocrinol Metab       Date:  2020-10-01       Impact factor: 5.958

  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.