AIMS: To measure the change in quality of care provided to sick children as a result of the routine implementation of the IMCI intervention. METHODS: Structured observations of consultations with sick children, exit interviews with caregivers, and facility reviews were conducted both before and after IMCI intervention in four health districts in Cape Town. Interventions were case management training, orientation courses for supervisors and medical officers, and some reorganisation of management systems. RESULTS: Twenty one nurses in 21 clinics were observed before and after the IMCI intervention; 90 and 70 child observations were conducted before and after IMCI intervention respectively. There was a marked improvement in assessment of danger signs in sick children (7% before versus 72% after), assessment of co-morbidity (integrated score 5.2 versus 8.2), rational prescribing (62% versus 84%), and starting treatment in the clinic (40% versus 70%). However there was no change in the treatment of anaemia or the prescribing of vitamin A or counselling of caregivers. There was no change in the knowledge of caregivers regarding medication or when to return to the health facility. Facilities were well stocked and supervision regular both before and after IMCI. CONCLUSION: This study has shown that under normal operating conditions and in a context of good facility infrastructure and management support, IMCI is associated with improvements in some important aspects of care.
AIMS: To measure the change in quality of care provided to sick children as a result of the routine implementation of the IMCI intervention. METHODS: Structured observations of consultations with sick children, exit interviews with caregivers, and facility reviews were conducted both before and after IMCI intervention in four health districts in Cape Town. Interventions were case management training, orientation courses for supervisors and medical officers, and some reorganisation of management systems. RESULTS: Twenty one nurses in 21 clinics were observed before and after the IMCI intervention; 90 and 70 child observations were conducted before and after IMCI intervention respectively. There was a marked improvement in assessment of danger signs in sick children (7% before versus 72% after), assessment of co-morbidity (integrated score 5.2 versus 8.2), rational prescribing (62% versus 84%), and starting treatment in the clinic (40% versus 70%). However there was no change in the treatment of anaemia or the prescribing of vitamin A or counselling of caregivers. There was no change in the knowledge of caregivers regarding medication or when to return to the health facility. Facilities were well stocked and supervision regular both before and after IMCI. CONCLUSION: This study has shown that under normal operating conditions and in a context of good facility infrastructure and management support, IMCI is associated with improvements in some important aspects of care.
Authors: S H Factor; J A Schillinger; H D Kalter; S Saha; H Begum; A Hossain; M Hossain; V Dewitt; M Hanif; N Khan; B Perkins; R E Black; B Schwartz Journal: Bull World Health Organ Date: 2001 Impact factor: 9.408
Authors: Anbrasi Edward; Vikas Dwivedi; Lais Mustafa; Peter M Hansen; David H Peters; Gilbert Burnham Journal: Bull World Health Organ Date: 2009-08-25 Impact factor: 9.408
Authors: Daniel J Morgan; Iruka N Okeke; Ramanan Laxminarayan; Eli N Perencevich; Scott Weisenberg Journal: Lancet Infect Dis Date: 2011-06-12 Impact factor: 25.071
Authors: Alyssa B Sharkey; Mickey Chopra; Debra Jackson; Peter J Winch; Cynthia S Minkovitz Journal: Trans R Soc Trop Med Hyg Date: 2011-12-01 Impact factor: 2.184
Authors: Duduzile Nsibande; Tanya Doherty; Petrida Ijumba; Mark Tomlinson; Debra Jackson; David Sanders; Joy Lawn Journal: BMC Health Serv Res Date: 2013-02-06 Impact factor: 2.655
Authors: Dick D Chamla; Shaffiq Essajee; Mark Young; Scott Kellerman; Ronnie Lovich; Nandita Sugandhi; Anouk Amzel; Chewe Luo Journal: J Int AIDS Soc Date: 2015-12-02 Impact factor: 5.396