Literature DB >> 15781524

A comparison of Depodur, a novel, single-dose extended-release epidural morphine, with standard epidural morphine for pain relief after lower abdominal surgery.

David Gambling1, Thomas Hughes, Gavin Martin, William Horton, Garen Manvelian.   

Abstract

In this randomized, controlled, dose-ranging study, we evaluated the analgesic efficacy of a novel single-dose extended-release epidural morphine (Depodur) in patients undergoing lower abdominal surgery. Five-hundred-forty-one patients were randomly assigned to one of six epidural treatments administered approximately 30 min before surgery. The 6 treatments were 5 mg of standard epidural morphine sulfate (MS) (active comparator); 5 mg of single-dose extended-release epidural morphine (EREM) (dose control); and 10, 15, 20, and 25 mg of single-dose EREM. The main study objective was to assess the efficacy of single-dose EREM 10, 15, 20, or 25 mg versus single-dose EREM 5 mg for the management of postoperative pain. This was done by plotting a linear dose-response relationship to assess postoperative IV patient-controlled analgesia (PCA) fentanyl consumption for breakthrough pain for 48 h after surgery. Secondary safety and efficacy analyses compared the 10-, 15-, 20-, and 25-mg single-dose EREM groups with the 5-mg single-dose EREM group and compared each single-dose EREM group with 5 mg of MS. As shown by the dose-response relationship, there was a dose-related reduction in the use of postoperative IV fentanyl through 48 h (estimated slope, -22.2; P = 0.0002). Patients treated with 10, 20, and 25 mg of single-dose EREM used significantly less IV fentanyl (mean +/- sd: 995 +/- 987 microg, P = 0.0446; 972 +/- 982 microg, P = 0.0221; and 683 +/- 620 microg, P < 0.0001, respectively) through 48 h after surgery compared with the 5-mg single-dose EREM group (1218 +/- 894 microg). At 48 h postdose, significantly more single-dose EREM patients (13%) than MS patients (2%) had required no IV fentanyl (P < 0.01). Although all treatment groups had access to PCA fentanyl and there was more frequent PCA fentanyl use in the MS group, patients in the single-dose EREM 15, 20, and 25 mg groups reported significantly lower pain-intensity scores and greater satisfaction with their pain relief. Overall, single-dose EREM was well tolerated, with 97% of adverse events rated as mild to moderate. As expected, the adverse events reported were consistent with those of other epidural opioids (i.e., nausea, vomiting, pruritus, and hypotension). In conclusion, this controlled study demonstrated that single-dose EREM can provide up to 48 h of postoperative analgesia, but supplementation for breakthrough pain is still required in most patients. Within the context of this study, the side effect profile of single-dose EREM was acceptable and predictable.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2005        PMID: 15781524     DOI: 10.1213/01.ANE.0000145009.03574.78

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Anesth Analg        ISSN: 0003-2999            Impact factor:   5.108


  29 in total

Review 1.  Pharmacology of drugs formulated with DepoFoam: a sustained release drug delivery system for parenteral administration using multivesicular liposome technology.

Authors:  Martin S Angst; David R Drover
Journal:  Clin Pharmacokinet       Date:  2006       Impact factor: 6.447

2.  Stimulus-responsive liposomes as smart nanoplatforms for drug delivery applications.

Authors:  Parham Sahandi Zangabad; Soroush Mirkiani; Shayan Shahsavari; Behrad Masoudi; Maryam Masroor; Hamid Hamed; Zahra Jafari; Yasamin Davatgaran Taghipour; Hura Hashemi; Mahdi Karimi; Michael R Hamblin
Journal:  Nanotechnol Rev       Date:  2017-12-12       Impact factor: 7.848

Review 3.  Clinical Translation of Nanomedicine.

Authors:  Yuanzeng Min; Joseph M Caster; Michael J Eblan; Andrew Z Wang
Journal:  Chem Rev       Date:  2015-06-19       Impact factor: 60.622

4.  Intrathecal Morphine Versus Extended-Release Epidural Morphine for Postoperative Pain Control in Pediatric Patients Undergoing Posterior Spinal Fusion.

Authors:  Mindy Cohen; Jeannie Zuk; Nancy McKay; Mark Erickson; Zhaoxing Pan; Jeffrey Galinkin
Journal:  Anesth Analg       Date:  2017-06       Impact factor: 5.108

Review 5.  Carriers for the tunable release of therapeutics: etymological classification and examples.

Authors:  Vuk Uskoković; Shreya Ghosh
Journal:  Expert Opin Drug Deliv       Date:  2016-06-27       Impact factor: 6.648

Review 6.  Controlled release drug delivery systems to improve post-operative pharmacotherapy.

Authors:  Prabhat Bhusal; Jeff Harrison; Manisha Sharma; David S Jones; Andrew G Hill; Darren Svirskis
Journal:  Drug Deliv Transl Res       Date:  2016-10       Impact factor: 4.617

Review 7.  Role of In Vitro Release Methods in Liposomal Formulation Development: Challenges and Regulatory Perspective.

Authors:  Deepak Solomon; Nilesh Gupta; Nihal S Mulla; Snehal Shukla; Yadir A Guerrero; Vivek Gupta
Journal:  AAPS J       Date:  2017-09-18       Impact factor: 4.009

Review 8.  Nanomedicines for renal disease: current status and future applications.

Authors:  Nazila Kamaly; John C He; Dennis A Ausiello; Omid C Farokhzad
Journal:  Nat Rev Nephrol       Date:  2016-10-31       Impact factor: 28.314

9.  Lessons learned with extended-release epidural morphine after total hip arthroplasty.

Authors:  Lauren Kahl; Javad Parvizi; Eugene R Viscusi; William J Hozack; Peter F Sharkey; Richard H Rothman
Journal:  Clin Orthop Relat Res       Date:  2009-12-12       Impact factor: 4.176

10.  Continuous epidural infusion of morphine versus single epidural injection of extended-release morphine for postoperative pain control after arthroplasty: a retrospective analysis.

Authors:  Stephanie Vanterpool; Randall Coombs; Karamarie Fecho
Journal:  Ther Clin Risk Manag       Date:  2010-06-24       Impact factor: 2.423

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.