Literature DB >> 15781512

The role of adrenergic and cholinergic transmission in volatile anesthetic-induced pain enhancement.

Thomas J Rowley1, Danette Daniel, Pamela Flood.   

Abstract

Volatile anesthetic drugs have a biphasic effect on pain transmission. At very small concentrations they enhance pain sensitivity whereas at larger subanesthetic concentrations they have an analgesic effect. Previous work has suggested that nicotinic inhibition could mediate the pronociceptive action of isoflurane. Furthermore, activation of nicotinic receptors facilitates the release of norepinephrine in the spinal cord. We hypothesize that nicotinic modulation of norepinephrine release in the spinal cord mediates isoflurane's pronociceptive action. We used hindpaw withdrawal latency as a measure of pain sensitivity after inhibition of adrenergic activity or treatment with nicotine in mice. Isoflurane's effect on pain is separable by concentration. The 50% effective concentration for pain enhancement is 0.16% isoflurane whereas the 50% effective concentration for the antinociceptive action of isoflurane is 0.8%. Depletion of systemic norepinephrine with the neurotoxin DSP-4 caused a reduction in baseline withdrawal latencies and prevented isoflurane pronociception. Baseline latency was also reduced by intrathecal yohimbine. After treatment with yohimbine, isoflurane had no additional pronociceptive effect. Nicotine administered through intracerebroventricular injection increased baseline latency but did not prevent isoflurane pronociception. Conversely, intrathecal applications of nicotine caused a slight reduction in baseline latency and prevented isoflurane's pronociceptive effect. We conclude that spinal noradrenergic transmission seems to be necessary for isoflurane pronociception to occur. Isoflurane may act by inhibiting tonically active nicotinic receptors that modulate the release of norepinephrine in the spinal cord.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2005        PMID: 15781512     DOI: 10.1213/01.ANE.0000147708.73945.B3

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Anesth Analg        ISSN: 0003-2999            Impact factor:   5.108


  6 in total

1.  Comparison of subarachnoid anesthetic effect of emulsified volatile anesthetics in rats.

Authors:  Jiao Guo; Cheng Zhou; Peng Liang; Han Huang; Fengshan Li; Xiangdong Chen; Jin Liu
Journal:  Int J Clin Exp Pathol       Date:  2014-12-01

2.  Transient tactile allodynia following intrathecal puncture in mouse: contributions of Toll-like receptor signaling.

Authors:  Jennifer A Stokes; Maripat Corr; Tony L Yaksh
Journal:  Neurosci Lett       Date:  2011-09-21       Impact factor: 3.046

3.  Emergence and Recovery Characteristics of Five Common Anesthetics in Pediatric Anesthesia: a Network Meta-analysis.

Authors:  Jianrong Guo; Xiaoju Jin; Huan Wang; Jun Yu; Xiaofang Zhou; Yong Cheng; Qiang Tao; Li Liu; Jianping Zhang
Journal:  Mol Neurobiol       Date:  2016-06-24       Impact factor: 5.590

4.  Effects of propofol anesthesia versus sevoflurane anesthesia on postoperative pain after radical gastrectomy: a randomized controlled trial.

Authors:  Fu-Hai Ji; Dan Wang; Juan Zhang; Hua-Yue Liu; Ke Peng
Journal:  J Pain Res       Date:  2018-06-25       Impact factor: 3.133

5.  Effects of intraoperative propofol-based total intravenous anesthesia on postoperative pain in spine surgery: Comparison with desflurane anesthesia - a randomised trial.

Authors:  Wei-Lin Lin; Meei-Shyuan Lee; Chih-Shung Wong; Shun-Ming Chan; Hou-Chuan Lai; Zhi-Fu Wu; Chueng-He Lu
Journal:  Medicine (Baltimore)       Date:  2019-03       Impact factor: 1.889

6.  Effects of sevoflurane and desflurane on the nociceptive responses of substantia gelatinosa neurons in the rat spinal cord dorsal horn: An in vivo patch-clamp analysis.

Authors:  Yosuke Inada; Yusuke Funai; Hiroyuki Yamasaki; Takashi Mori; Kiyonobu Nishikawa
Journal:  Mol Pain       Date:  2020 Jan-Dec       Impact factor: 3.395

  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.