| Literature DB >> 15781021 |
Arash Arya1, Hans Kottkamp, Christopher Piorkowski, Petra Schirdewahn, Hildegard Tanner, Richard Kobza, Anja Dorszewski, Jing-Hong Gerds-Li, Gerhard Hindricks.
Abstract
Studies analyzing the diagnostic value of 12-lead electrocardiographic criteria differentiating slow-fast atrioventricular nodal reentrant tachycardia (AVNRT) from atrioventricular reentrant tachycardia (AVRT) due to concealed accessory pathway have shown inconsistent results. In 97 patients (50 with AVNRT, 47 with AVRT) 12-lead electrocardiograms (ECGs) were recorded during sinus rhythm and tachycardia (QRS <120 ms). The ECGs were blinded for diagnosis and patient and analyzed independently by 2 electrophysiologists. The studied criteria differentiating AVNRT from AVRT included pseudo-r'/S, the presence of a retrograde P wave, RP interval, ST-segment depression >/=2 mm with the number and location of the affected leads, QRS amplitude, and cycle length alternans.Entities:
Mesh:
Year: 2005 PMID: 15781021 DOI: 10.1016/j.amjcard.2004.12.020
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Am J Cardiol ISSN: 0002-9149 Impact factor: 2.778