Literature DB >> 15781016

Comparison of cilostazol and clopidogrel after successful coronary stenting.

Seung-Whan Lee1, Seong-Wook Park, Myeong-Ki Hong, Cheol Whan Lee, Young-Hak Kim, Jae-Hyeong Park, Su-Jin Kang, Ki-Hoon Han, Jae-Joong Kim, Seung-Jung Park.   

Abstract

This study compared the safety and efficacy of cilostazol and clopidogrel after coronary stenting. Patients (n = 689) who underwent successful stenting were randomly assigned to receive cilostazol (group 1, n = 344, 612 lesions) or clopidogrel (group 2, n = 345, 628 lesions). The incidence of subacute stent thrombosis or major adverse cardiac events, including death, myocardial infarction, and target lesion revascularization within 30 days (2.6% in group 1 vs 2.0% in group 2, p = 0.61) and side effects that required cessation of study drug (0.6% each) did not differ statistically between groups. These results indicate that cilostazol is as safe and effective as clopidogrel in preventing thrombotic complications after stenting.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2005        PMID: 15781016     DOI: 10.1016/j.amjcard.2004.12.012

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Am J Cardiol        ISSN: 0002-9149            Impact factor:   2.778


  8 in total

Review 1.  Clinical efficacy and safety of cilostazol: a critical review of the literature.

Authors:  Kelly C Rogers; Carrie S Oliphant; Shannon W Finks
Journal:  Drugs       Date:  2015-03       Impact factor: 9.546

Review 2.  Clopidogrel: a review of its use in the prevention of thrombosis.

Authors:  Greg L Plosker; Katherine A Lyseng-Williamson
Journal:  Drugs       Date:  2007       Impact factor: 9.546

Review 3.  Implementation of standardized assessment and reporting of myocardial infarction in contemporary randomized controlled trials: a systematic review.

Authors:  Sergio Leonardi; Paul W Armstrong; Phillip J Schulte; E Magnus Ohman; L Kristin Newby
Journal:  Eur Heart J       Date:  2013-01-25       Impact factor: 29.983

Review 4.  Management Strategies for Clopidogrel Hypersensitivity.

Authors:  Craig J Beavers; Nicolas W Carris; Kathryn M Ruf
Journal:  Drugs       Date:  2015-06       Impact factor: 9.546

5.  Synergistic mechanism of coincidence of two subacute stent thromboses: Insights from multiple imaging observations.

Authors:  Tadakiyo Ido; Yohei Sotomi; Yasuhiro Ichibori; Yasunori Ueda; Yoshiharu Higuchi
Journal:  J Cardiol Cases       Date:  2021-04-15

6.  Clopidogrel-induced neutropenia after coronary stenting: is cilostazol a good alternative?

Authors:  Massimo Montalto; Italo Porto; Antonella Gallo; Claudia Camaioni; Roberta Della Bona; Antonio Grieco; Filippo Crea; Raffaele Landolfi
Journal:  Int J Vasc Med       Date:  2011-08-11

7.  A randomized study assessing the effects of pretreatment with cilostazol on periprocedural myonecrosis after percutaneous coronary intervention.

Authors:  Byeong-Keuk Kim; Seung Jin Oh; Se-Jung Yoon; Dong Woon Jeon; Young-Guk Ko; Joo Young Yang
Journal:  Yonsei Med J       Date:  2011-09       Impact factor: 2.759

8.  Optimal management of platelet function after coronary stenting.

Authors:  Seung-Jung Park; Seung-Whan Lee
Journal:  Curr Treat Options Cardiovasc Med       Date:  2007-02
  8 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.