Literature DB >> 1578020

Evaluating two different evaporative cooling management systems for dairy cows in a hot, dry climate.

D P Ryan1, M P Boland, E Kopel, D Armstrong, L Munyakazi, R A Godke, R H Ingraham.   

Abstract

Milk production, rectal temperature, live weight gain, reproductive performance, and weather data were obtained on 150 Holstein cows managed under two cooling systems on a large dairy farm in Saudi Arabia during the summer months. Cows were paired at the onset of the trial according to days postpartum, lactation number, and current milk production. Females were then allocated either to a system that forced air, precooled by evaporative cooling, over the cows or to a system that alternately showered a fine mist onto the surface of the cows and then forced air at ambient temperature over them. The cows receiving evaporative cooling and those with spray and fan cooling were on sand and on slatted concrete floor, respectively, during the periods of cooling. The onset of estrus was observed during the night when the cows preferred the unshaded corral. For the 120-d trial period, 84% (62 of 75) of the cows receiving evaporative cooling and 60% (44 of 75) of the cows receiving spray and fan cooling became pregnant. In the evaporative cooling system, the pregnancy rate per insemination was 35.2% (179 inseminations) versus 23.2% (194 inseminations) for spray and fan cooling. The mean postpartum interval to pregnancy was 117.6 d for the evaporative cooling cows and 146.7 d for spray and fan cooling cows. The evaporative cooling system, with its open shades and sand bedding, enhanced reproductive performance and milk production compared with that of cows cooled with a spray and fan system with slatted flooring in this hot climate.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1992        PMID: 1578020     DOI: 10.3168/jds.S0022-0302(92)77849-7

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Dairy Sci        ISSN: 0022-0302            Impact factor:   4.034


  8 in total

1.  Thermoregulatory responses of Holstein and Brown Swiss heat-stressed dairy cows to two different cooling systems.

Authors:  Abelardo Correa-Calderon; Dennis Armstrong; Donald Ray; Sue DeNise; Mark Enns; Christine Howison
Journal:  Int J Biometeorol       Date:  2003-11-18       Impact factor: 3.787

2.  Effects of evaporative cooling on reproductive performance and milk production of dairy cows in hot wet conditions.

Authors:  S Khongdee; N Chaiyabutr; G Hinch; K Markvichitr; C Vajrabukka
Journal:  Int J Biometeorol       Date:  2006-03-29       Impact factor: 3.787

3.  Effects of short-term cooling on pregnancy rate of dairy heifers under summer heat stress.

Authors:  A Moghaddam; I Karimi; M Pooyanmehr
Journal:  Vet Res Commun       Date:  2009-02-14       Impact factor: 2.459

4.  Effects of evaporative cooling on the regulation of body water and milk production in crossbred Holstein cattle in a tropical environment.

Authors:  N Chaiyabutr; S Chanpongsang; S Suadsong
Journal:  Int J Biometeorol       Date:  2008-04-22       Impact factor: 3.787

5.  Monthly variation of fertility and oestrus frequency in crossbred dual-purpose cows in three agroecological areas of the South American tropics.

Authors:  F Perea; E Soto; H Hernández; D González; R Palomares; A De Ondiz; C González
Journal:  Trop Anim Health Prod       Date:  2006-05       Impact factor: 1.893

Review 6.  Effect of heat stress on reproductive performances of dairy cattle and buffaloes: A review.

Authors:  Soumya Dash; A K Chakravarty; Avtar Singh; Arpan Upadhyay; Manvendra Singh; Saleem Yousuf
Journal:  Vet World       Date:  2016-03-05

Review 7.  Practices for Alleviating Heat Stress of Dairy Cows in Humid Continental Climates: A Literature Review.

Authors:  Sébastien Fournel; Véronique Ouellet; Édith Charbonneau
Journal:  Animals (Basel)       Date:  2017-05-02       Impact factor: 2.752

8.  Projected heat stress challenges and abatement opportunities for U.S. milk production.

Authors:  Kpoti M Gunn; Michael A Holly; Tamie L Veith; Anthony R Buda; Rishi Prasad; C Alan Rotz; Kathy J Soder; Anne M K Stoner
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2019-03-28       Impact factor: 3.240

  8 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.