Literature DB >> 15780161

Sentinel lymph node biopsy in penile cancer: evolution and insights.

Jonathan Izawa1, Daniel Kedar, Franklin Wong, Curtis A Pettaway.   

Abstract

INTRODUCTION: Defining the presence or absence of microscopic metastases in the inguinal lymph nodes in patients with invasive penile squamous carcinoma and no palpable adenopathy remains crucial but difficult short of performing inguinal lymphadenectomy.
METHODS: We reviewed the results of less invasive procedures such as traditional sentinel node biopsy and contemporary dynamic sentinel node biopsy aided by intraoperative lymphatic mapping (IOLM) to determine their role in the management of patients without palpable inguinal adenopathy
RESULTS: Inguinal node biopsy directed to the sentinel node area or region although initially promising was associated with a recurrence rate of 16% (24/150) among seven series reported. Extending the dissection to a wider region did not improve these results (20% recurrence, 5/25 patients). Preoperative lymphoscintigraphy combined with IOLM (with blue dye and a hand held gamma probe to detect radioactive counts) routinely detected sentinel nodes in the Netherlands Cancer Institute experience. However IOLM was associated with a false negative rate of 18% (6/34 patients). IOLM using an open incision approach at M.D. Anderson Cancer Center provided evidence for inguinal lymph drainage to alternate areas within the inguinal field confirming proof of principle for IOLM.
CONCLUSION: Inguinal lymph node biopsy directed to the sentinel node area to detect microscopic metastases is no longer recommended. Dynamic sentinel node biopsy utilizing IOLM is a promising technique in evolution that requires further testing among high volume centers for penile cancer. Contemporary superficial and modified inguinal dissection techniques with intraoperative frozen section remain the "gold standard" for defining the presence of microscopic metastases.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2005        PMID: 15780161

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Can J Urol        ISSN: 1195-9479            Impact factor:   1.344


  3 in total

Review 1.  Challenges and controversies in the management of penile cancer.

Authors:  Majid Shabbir; Oliver Kayes; Suks Minhas
Journal:  Nat Rev Urol       Date:  2014-11-18       Impact factor: 14.432

Review 2.  Penile cancer: current therapy and future directions.

Authors:  G Sonpavde; L C Pagliaro; C Buonerba; T B Dorff; R J Lee; G Di Lorenzo
Journal:  Ann Oncol       Date:  2013-01-04       Impact factor: 32.976

Review 3.  [Value of sentinel node biopsy for urological tumors].

Authors:  F Wawroschek; R Harzmann; D Weckermann
Journal:  Urologe A       Date:  2005-06       Impact factor: 0.639

  3 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.