Literature DB >> 1578008

Ultrastructure of the horseshoe bat's organ of Corti. I. Scanning electron microscopy.

M Vater1, M Lenoir.   

Abstract

The organ of Corti of the echolocating horseshoe bat (Rhinolophus rouxi) was investigated with scanning electron microscopy in order to provide a comparison with non-echolocating mammals. Throughout the cochlea of horseshoe bats, each outer hair cell (OHC) possesses three rows of stereocilia and there are no morphological distinctions among the different rows of OHCs. However, there are morphological differences between different regions along the cochlea. In the lower and upper basal turn, the receptor surfaces of OHCs are characterized by extremely wide W-shaped stereocilia bundles and wingshaped cuticular plates. The cuticular plates of OHCs of the middle and outermost rows are arranged parallel to each other. Stereocilia length is only 0.8 microns and there is an exaggerated angle of inclination of the shortest row of stereocilia towards the next taller one. Stereocilia arrangements in the apex of the horseshoe bat's cochlea closely resembles those observed in the midbasal region of the rat cochlea. Inner hair cells (IHC) in the lower basal turn appear specialized. They possess only two rows of stereocilia and only 7-8 stereocilia per row. Their cuticular plates are small and oval and widely separated from one another in the longitudinal direction. IHCs at all other locations possess three and up to four rows of stereocilia and 17-20 stereocilia per row. Their cuticular plates are elongated and closely spaced. The transition from specialized to typical mammalian morphology occurs abruptly (over a distance of about 100-150 microns) at the border between the lower and the upper basal turn. This transition is not accompanied by a change in OHC morphology. In the subsurface of the tectorial membrane, throughout the cochlea, there are distinct imprints of the tallest row of stereocilia of all three rows of OHCs and of the IHCs. Data are discussed in relation to specialized aspects of the cochlear frequency map in horseshoe bats and as possible micromechanical adaptations to ultra-high frequency hearing.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1992        PMID: 1578008     DOI: 10.1002/cne.903180403

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Comp Neurol        ISSN: 0021-9967            Impact factor:   3.215


  7 in total

Review 1.  Auditory fovea and Doppler shift compensation: adaptations for flutter detection in echolocating bats using CF-FM signals.

Authors:  Hans-Ulrich Schnitzler; Annette Denzinger
Journal:  J Comp Physiol A Neuroethol Sens Neural Behav Physiol       Date:  2010-09-21       Impact factor: 1.836

Review 2.  The sensory world of the platypus.

Authors:  J D Pettigrew; P R Manger; S L Fine
Journal:  Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci       Date:  1998-07-29       Impact factor: 6.237

Review 3.  The physiology of mechanoelectrical transduction channels in hearing.

Authors:  Robert Fettiplace; Kyunghee X Kim
Journal:  Physiol Rev       Date:  2014-07       Impact factor: 37.312

4.  Electromotility of outer hair cells from the cochlea of the echolocating bat, Carollia perspicillata.

Authors:  G Reuter; M Kössl; W Hemmert; S Preyer; U Zimmermann; H P Zenner
Journal:  J Comp Physiol A       Date:  1994-10       Impact factor: 1.836

5.  The hearing gene Prestin reunites echolocating bats.

Authors:  Gang Li; Jinhong Wang; Stephen J Rossiter; Gareth Jones; James A Cotton; Shuyi Zhang
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2008-09-05       Impact factor: 11.205

6.  Cochlear amplification and tuning depend on the cellular arrangement within the organ of Corti.

Authors:  Hamid Motallebzadeh; Joris A M Soons; Sunil Puria
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2018-05-14       Impact factor: 11.205

7.  Age-dependent gene expression in the inner ear of big brown bats (Eptesicus fuscus).

Authors:  Beatrice Mao; Cynthia F Moss; Gerald S Wilkinson
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2017-10-26       Impact factor: 3.240

  7 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.