Literature DB >> 15779964

Slow adsorption reaction between arsenic species and goethite (alpha-FeOOH): diffusion or heterogeneous surface reaction control.

Junshe Zhang1, Robert Stanforth.   

Abstract

The slow stage of phosphate or arsenate adsorption on hydrous metal oxides frequently follows an Elovich equation. The equation can be derived by assuming kinetic control by either a diffusion process (either interparticle or intraparticle) or a heterogeneous surface reaction. The aim of this study is to determine whether the slow stage of arsenic adsorption on goethite is more consistent with diffusion or heterogeneous surface reaction control. Adsorption kinetics of arsenate and dimethylarsinate (DMA) on goethite (alpha-FeOOH) were investigated at different pH values and inert electrolyte concentrations. Their adsorption kinetics was described and compared using Elovich (Gamma vs ln time) plots. Desorption of arsenate and DMA was studied by increasing the pH of the suspension from pH 4.0 to pH 10.0 or 12.0. The effective particle sizes and zeta-potential of goethite were also determined. Effective particle size increased rapidly as the pH approached pH(IEP), both in the absence and presence of arsenic. Inert electrolyte concentrations and pH had no effect on the slow stage of arsenate adsorption on goethite, while the kinetics of DMA adsorption on goethite was influenced by both parameters. The slow stage of arsenate adsorption on goethite follows an Elovich equation. Since effective particle size changes with both pH and inert electrolyte concentrations, and effective particle size influences interparticle diffusion, the arsenate adsorption kinetics indicate that the slow adsorption step is not due to interparticle diffusion. DMA also has complex adsorption kinetics with a slow adsorption stage. DMA desorbed completely and rapidly when the pH was raised, in contrast to the slow adsorption kinetics, indicating that the slow adsorption step is not due to intraparticle diffusion. The slow adsorption is not the result of diffusion, but rather is due either to the heterogeneity of the surface site bonding energy or to other reactions controlling arsenic removal from solution.

Entities:  

Year:  2005        PMID: 15779964     DOI: 10.1021/la047636e

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Langmuir        ISSN: 0743-7463            Impact factor:   3.882


  7 in total

1.  Sorption specificity and desorption hysteresis of gibberellic acid on ferrihydrite compared to goethite, hematite, montmorillonite, and kaolinite.

Authors:  Li Zhang; Fei Liu; Liang Chen
Journal:  Environ Sci Pollut Res Int       Date:  2017-06-28       Impact factor: 4.223

2.  Comparative adsorption of amylase, protease and lipase on ZnFe2O4: kinetics, isothermal and thermodynamics studies.

Authors:  Abideen Idowu Adeogun; Sarafadeen Olateju Kareeem; Oluwatobi Samson Adebayo; Saka Adebayo Balogun
Journal:  3 Biotech       Date:  2017-06-30       Impact factor: 2.406

3.  Understanding arsenate reaction kinetics with ferric hydroxides.

Authors:  James Farrell; Binod K Chaudhary
Journal:  Environ Sci Technol       Date:  2013-07-10       Impact factor: 9.028

4.  Point of zero charge: Role in pyromorphite formation and bioaccessibility of lead and arsenic in phosphate amended soils.

Authors:  Ranju R Karna; Matthew R Noerpel; Todd P Luxton; Kirk G Scheckel
Journal:  Soil Syst       Date:  2018

5.  Sorption of Monothioarsenate to the Natural Sediments and Its Competition with Arsenite and Arsenate.

Authors:  Huimei Shan; Jinxian Zhang; Sanxi Peng; Hongbin Zhan; Danxue Liao
Journal:  Int J Environ Res Public Health       Date:  2021-12-06       Impact factor: 3.390

6.  Geogenic arsenic removal through core-shell based functionalized nanoparticles: Groundwater in-situ treatment perspective in the post-COVID anthropocene.

Authors:  Nirav P Raval; Manish Kumar
Journal:  J Hazard Mater       Date:  2020-07-15       Impact factor: 10.588

7.  Hollow Polyaniline Microsphere/Fe3O4 Nanocomposite as an Effective Adsorbent for Removal of Arsenic from Water.

Authors:  Soumi Dutta; Kunal Manna; Suneel Kumar Srivastava; Ashok Kumar Gupta; Manoj Kumar Yadav
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2020-03-18       Impact factor: 4.379

  7 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.