Literature DB >> 15779464

Why the United States has no national health insurance: stakeholder mobilization against the welfare state, 1945--1996.

Jill Quadagno1.   

Abstract

The United States is the only western industrialized nation that fails to provide universal coverage and the only nation where health care for the majority of the population is financed by for-profit, minimally regulated private insurance companies. These arrangements leave one-sixth of the population uninsured at any given time, and they leave others at risk of losing insurance as a result of normal life course events. Political theorists of the welfare state usually attribute the failure of national health insurance in the United States to broader forces of American political development, but they ignore the distinctive character of the health care financing arrangements that do exist. Medical sociologists emphasize the way that physicians parlayed their professional expertise into legal, institutional, and economic power but not the way this power was asserted in the political arena. This paper proposes a theory of stakeholder mobilization as the primary obstacle to national health insurance. The evidence supports the argument that powerful stakeholder groups, first the American Medical Association, then organizations of insurance companies and employer groups, have been able to defeat every effort to enact national health insurance across an entire century because they had superior resources and an organizational structure that closely mirrored the federated arrangements of the American state. The exception occurred when the AFL-CIO, with its national leadership, state federations and union locals, mobilized on behalf of Medicare.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2004        PMID: 15779464

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Health Soc Behav        ISSN: 0022-1465


  9 in total

Review 1.  Minority group status and healthful aging: social structure still matters.

Authors:  Jacqueline L Angel; Ronald J Angel
Journal:  Am J Public Health       Date:  2006-05-30       Impact factor: 9.308

2.  Divorce and women's risk of health insurance loss.

Authors:  Bridget Lavelle; Pamela J Smock
Journal:  J Health Soc Behav       Date:  2012-11-12

3.  Influences of organizational features of healthcare settings on clinical decision making: qualitative results from a cross-national factorial experiment.

Authors:  Karen E Lutfey; Stephen M Campbell; Lisa D Marceau; Martin O Roland; John B McKinlay
Journal:  Health (London)       Date:  2010-12-22

4.  Does supplemental private health insurance incentivize household risky financial asset investment? Evidence from the China Household Financial Survey.

Authors:  Si Shi; Yawen Jiang
Journal:  Int J Health Econ Manag       Date:  2022-03-31

5.  Structural and cultural factors in successful aging among older Hispanics.

Authors:  Ronald J Angel
Journal:  Fam Community Health       Date:  2009 Jan-Mar

6.  What is new with old? What old age teaches us about inequality and stratification.

Authors:  Corey M Abramson; Elena Portacolone
Journal:  Sociol Compass       Date:  2017-03-01

7.  Interrogating scarcity: how to think about 'resource-scarce settings'.

Authors:  Ted Schrecker
Journal:  Health Policy Plan       Date:  2012-08-16       Impact factor: 3.344

8.  Impact of tobacco industry and other corporations in the defeat of the 1994 Clinton health care plan.

Authors:  Michael Givel
Journal:  BMC Public Health       Date:  2017-06-21       Impact factor: 3.295

9.  Political advocacy in pharmacy: challenges and opportunities.

Authors:  Dorie E Apollonio
Journal:  Integr Pharm Res Pract       Date:  2014
  9 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.