Literature DB >> 15779077

In search of the vertebrate phylotypic stage: a molecular examination of the developmental hourglass model and von Baer's third law.

Einat Hazkani-Covo1, David Wool, Dan Graur.   

Abstract

In 1828, Karl von Baer proposed a set of four evolutionary "laws" pertaining to embryological development. According to von Baer's third law, young embryos from different species are relatively undifferentiated and resemble one another but as development proceeds, distinguishing features of the species begin to appear and embryos of different species progressively diverge from one another. An expansion of this law, called "the hourglass model," has been proposed independently by Denis Duboule and Rudolf Raff in the 1990s. According to the hourglass model, ontogeny is characterized by a starting point at which different taxa differ markedly from one another, followed by a stage of reduced intertaxonomic variability (the phylotypic stage), and ending in a von-Baer-like progressive divergence among the taxa. A possible "translation" of the hourglass model into molecular terminology would suggest that orthologs expressed in stages described by the tapered part of the hourglass should resemble one another more than orthologs expressed in the expansive parts that precede or succeed the phylotypic stage. We tested this hypothesis using 1,585 mouse genes expressed during 26 embryonic stages, and their human orthologs. Evolutionary divergence was estimated at different embryonic stages by calculating pairwise distances between corresponding orthologous proteins from mouse and human. Two independent datasets were used. One dataset contained genes that are expressed solely in a single developmental stage; the second was made of genes expressed at different developmental stages. In the second dataset the genes were classified according to their earliest stage of expression. We fitted second order polynomials to the two datasets. The two polynomials displayed minima as expected from the hourglass model. The molecular results suggest, albeit weakly, that a phylotypic stage (or period) indeed exists. Its temporal location, sometimes between the first-somites stage and the formation of the posterior neuropore, was in approximate agreement with the morphologically defined phylotypic stage. The molecular evidence for the later parts of the hourglass model, i.e., for von Baer's third law, was stronger than that for the earlier parts. Copyright 2005 Wiley-Liss, Inc.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2005        PMID: 15779077     DOI: 10.1002/jez.b.21033

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Exp Zool B Mol Dev Evol        ISSN: 1552-5007            Impact factor:   2.656


  28 in total

1.  The phylotypic stage as a boundary of modular memory: non mechanistic perspective.

Authors:  Jana Svorcová
Journal:  Theory Biosci       Date:  2012-02-10       Impact factor: 1.919

2.  A phylogenetically based transcriptome age index mirrors ontogenetic divergence patterns.

Authors:  Tomislav Domazet-Lošo; Diethard Tautz
Journal:  Nature       Date:  2010-12-09       Impact factor: 49.962

3.  Gene expression divergence recapitulates the developmental hourglass model.

Authors:  Alex T Kalinka; Karolina M Varga; Dave T Gerrard; Stephan Preibisch; David L Corcoran; Julia Jarrells; Uwe Ohler; Casey M Bergman; Pavel Tomancak
Journal:  Nature       Date:  2010-12-09       Impact factor: 49.962

4.  Evolutionary biology: Genomic hourglass.

Authors:  Benjamin Prud'homme; Nicolas Gompel
Journal:  Nature       Date:  2010-12-09       Impact factor: 49.962

Review 5.  Molecular control of facial morphology.

Authors:  B Liu; S M Rooker; J A Helms
Journal:  Semin Cell Dev Biol       Date:  2009-09-10       Impact factor: 7.727

6.  Molecular signaling in zebrafish development and the vertebrate phylotypic period.

Authors:  Aurélie Comte; Julien Roux; Marc Robinson-Rechavi
Journal:  Evol Dev       Date:  2010 Mar-Apr       Impact factor: 1.930

7.  An explanatory evo-devo model for the developmental hourglass.

Authors:  Saamer Akhshabi; Shrutii Sarda; Constantine Dovrolis; Soojin Yi
Journal:  F1000Res       Date:  2014-07-08

8.  Comparative transcriptome analysis reveals vertebrate phylotypic period during organogenesis.

Authors:  Naoki Irie; Shigeru Kuratani
Journal:  Nat Commun       Date:  2011       Impact factor: 14.919

9.  The hourglass and the early conservation models--co-existing patterns of developmental constraints in vertebrates.

Authors:  Barbara Piasecka; Paweł Lichocki; Sébastien Moretti; Sven Bergmann; Marc Robinson-Rechavi
Journal:  PLoS Genet       Date:  2013-04-25       Impact factor: 5.917

10.  Measuring potential effects of the developmental burden associated with the vertebrate notochord.

Authors:  Satoko Fujimoto; Kaori Yamanaka; Chiharu Tanegashima; Osamu Nishimura; Shigehiro Kuraku; Shigeru Kuratani; Naoki Irie
Journal:  J Exp Zool B Mol Dev Evol       Date:  2021-03-10       Impact factor: 2.368

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.