Literature DB >> 15778205

The clinical characteristics and investigations planned in patients with stable angina presenting to cardiologists in Europe: from the Euro Heart Survey of Stable Angina.

Caroline A Daly1, Felicity Clemens, Jose L Lopez Sendon, Luigi Tavazzi, Eric Boersma, Nicholas Danchin, Francois Delahaye, Anselm Gitt, Desmond Julian, David Mulcahy, Witold Ruzyllo, Kristian Thygesen, Freek Verheugt, Kim M Fox.   

Abstract

AIMS: The Euro Heart Survey of Stable Angina set out to prospectively study the presentation and management of patients with stable angina as first seen by a cardiologist in Europe, with particular reference to adherence to existing guidelines and regional variability in patient presentation and initial assessment. METHODS AND
RESULTS: Consecutive outpatients with a clinical diagnosis by a cardiologist of stable angina were enrolled in the study and 3779 patients were included in the analysis. The average age was 61 years and 58% were male. The majority of patients (88%) had mild to moderate angina, CCS class I or II. Despite a high prevalence of recognized risk factors, 27% did not have cholesterol and 33% did not have glucose measured within 4 weeks of assessment. The resting ECG was abnormal in 41% of patients. An exercise ECG was performed or planned as part of initial investigation in 76% of patients and 18% had a stress imaging test such as perfusion scanning or stress echo. A coronary angiogram was performed or planned in 41%, and 64% had an echo. The time from assessment to investigation varied widely, particularly for angiography. One in 10 patients had neither any form of stress test nor angiography, with marked regional variation. Availability of invasive facilities increased the likelihood of both non-invasive and invasive investigations. Those with more severe symptoms or longer duration of symptoms or a positive non-invasive test were more likely to have angiography. In multivariable analysis, a positive stress test was the strongest predictor of the use of angiography, associated with a six-fold increase in the likelihood of invasive investigation. However, gender and availability of facilities were also predictive.
CONCLUSION: Considerable variation in features at presentation and use of investigations has been identified in the stable angina population in Europe. The evaluation of biochemical cardiovascular risk factors was suboptimal. Overall rates of non-invasive investigation for angina and the clinical appropriateness of factors predictive of the use of invasive investigation were broadly in line with guidelines. However, the influence of access to facilities, and marked international variation in rates and timing of investigation suggest that factors unrelated to clinical need are also influential in the management of patients with stable angina.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2005        PMID: 15778205     DOI: 10.1093/eurheartj/ehi171

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Eur Heart J        ISSN: 0195-668X            Impact factor:   29.983


  28 in total

1.  Assessment of cardiovascular risk in primary health care.

Authors:  Päivi Korhonen; Risto Vesalainen; Pertti Aarnio; Hannu Kautiainen; Salme Järvenpää; Ilkka Kantola
Journal:  Scand J Prim Health Care       Date:  2012-06       Impact factor: 2.581

2.  Cost-effectiveness modelling of percutaneous coronary interventions in stable coronary artery disease.

Authors:  Ariel Beresniak; Thibaut Caruba; Brigitte Sabatier; Yves Juillière; Olivier Dubourg; Nicolas Danchin
Journal:  World J Cardiol       Date:  2015-10-26

3.  Can risk score models help in reducing serious outcome events in patients with stable angina?

Authors:  Christian Juhl Terkelsen; Werner Vach
Journal:  BMJ       Date:  2005-10-06

4.  Cardiothoracic ratio within the "normal" range independently predicts mortality in patients undergoing coronary angiography.

Authors:  M Justin S Zaman; Julie Sanders; Angela M Crook; Gene Feder; Martin Shipley; Adam Timmis; Harry Hemingway
Journal:  Heart       Date:  2006-12-12       Impact factor: 5.994

5.  The prevalence and management of angina among patients with chronic coronary artery disease across US outpatient cardiology practices: insights from the Angina Prevalence and Provider Evaluation of Angina Relief (APPEAR) study.

Authors:  Faraz Kureshi; Ali Shafiq; Suzanne V Arnold; Kensey Gosch; Tracie Breeding; Ashwath S Kumar; Philip G Jones; John A Spertus
Journal:  Clin Cardiol       Date:  2016-11-07       Impact factor: 2.882

6.  How effective are rapid access chest pain clinics? Prognosis of incident angina and non-cardiac chest pain in 8762 consecutive patients.

Authors:  N Sekhri; G S Feder; C Junghans; H Hemingway; A D Timmis
Journal:  Heart       Date:  2006-06-21       Impact factor: 5.994

7.  Predicting prognosis in stable angina--results from the Euro heart survey of stable angina: prospective observational study.

Authors:  Caroline A Daly; Bianca De Stavola; Jose L Lopez Sendon; Luigi Tavazzi; Eric Boersma; Felicity Clemens; Nicholas Danchin; Francois Delahaye; Anselm Gitt; Desmond Julian; David Mulcahy; Witold Ruzyllo; Kristian Thygesen; Freek Verheugt; Kim M Fox
Journal:  BMJ       Date:  2006-01-13

Review 8.  Physiologic risk assessment in stable ischemic heart disease: still superior to the anatomic angiographic approach.

Authors:  Alessia Gimelli; Paolo Marzullo; Daniele Rovai
Journal:  J Nucl Cardiol       Date:  2009-07-28       Impact factor: 5.952

9.  Absence of respiratory effects with ivabradine in patients with asthma.

Authors:  K Suresh Babu; Frantisek Gadzik; Stephen T Holgate
Journal:  Br J Clin Pharmacol       Date:  2008-03-13       Impact factor: 4.335

10.  Treatment of chronic CAD--do the guidelines (ESC, AHA) reflect daily practice?

Authors:  Harald Tillmanns; Ali Erdogan; Daniel Sedding
Journal:  Herz       Date:  2009-02       Impact factor: 1.443

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.