Literature DB >> 15777335

Parietal bone as graft material for maxillary sinus floor elevation: structure and remodeling of the donor and of recipient sites.

Ingrid Le Lorc'h-Bukiet1, Jean-François Tulasne, Annie Llorens, Philippe Lesclous.   

Abstract

Particulate parietal bone is used for maxillary sinus floor elevation procedure prior to dental implant placement. However, data on internal structure of the parietal bone and on graft remodeling and incorporation in the host bone are limited. We determined the structure and remodeling activities of 24 parietal bone specimens sampled at time of sinus grafting (T1 samples), and the amount and turnover of bone formed at the recipient site at time of implant placement (T2 samples, obtained 10 months after T1 samples, on average). In T1 samples, the outer cortex was 1.16+/-0.45 mm thick, had a typical haversian structure, and showed a low level of remodeling. In the cancellous portion of the samples, trabecular bone volume represented 52.8+/-10.3%. Bone remodeling was more active in the cancellous portion than in the cortical portion, but few osteoblasts and osteoclasts were seen. T2 samples consisted solely of trabecular bone, which occupied 49.4+/-18.4% of total sample volume. The boundary between new bone and the recipient bed was not discernible. Remnants of the graft particles were embedded within new bone, and showed signs of intense resorption. Bone remodeling was highly active, as shown by the presence of numerous osteoclasts resorbing new bone, together with thick osteoid seams and large osteoblasts. A loose cotton-like mineralized material was frequently observed in the marrow spaces; this acellular and non-collagenous material was strongly stained by toluidine blue, suggesting a glycoprotein nature. This study offers insights into cortical and trabecular bone structure and shows the low-level remodeling activity of parietal bone. About 10 months after grafting, the grafted chips were incorporated in new bone and almost completely resorbed. This high turnover may be beneficial for implant placement.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2005        PMID: 15777335     DOI: 10.1111/j.1600-0501.2004.01102.x

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Clin Oral Implants Res        ISSN: 0905-7161            Impact factor:   5.977


  5 in total

Review 1.  [Regeneration instead of reparation: a critical review of the autogenous bone transplant as "golden standard" of reconstructive oral surgery].

Authors:  Hans-Henning Horch; Christoph Pautke
Journal:  Mund Kiefer Gesichtschir       Date:  2006-07

2.  Autologus parietal grafts in preprosthethic surgery.

Authors:  E F Gherlone; R Vinci; L D'Aversa
Journal:  Oral Implantol (Rome)       Date:  2010-03-04

3.  Histomorphometric evaluation of anorganic bovine bone coverage to reduce autogenous grafts resorption: preliminary results.

Authors:  Carlo Maiorana; Mario Beretta; Giovanni Battista Grossi; Franco Santoro; Alan Scott Herford; Heiner Nagursky; Marco Cicciù
Journal:  Open Dent J       Date:  2011-04-25

4.  Sinus lift: 3 years follow up comparing autogenous bone block versus autogenous particulated grafts.

Authors:  Luca Pisoni; Antonio Lucchi; Marco Persia; Otello Marchi; Paolo Ordesi; Sandro Siervo
Journal:  J Dent Sci       Date:  2016-07-19       Impact factor: 2.080

5.  Autogenous bone block in the treatment of teeth with hopeless prognosis.

Authors:  Nymphea Pandit; I K Pandit; Rajvir Malik; Deepika Bali; Shaifi Jindal
Journal:  Contemp Clin Dent       Date:  2012-10
  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.