Literature DB >> 15776289

Ecological context and the importance of body and gnathopod size for pairing success in two amphipod ecomorphs.

Gary A Wellborn1, Suzanne E Bartholf.   

Abstract

Ecological context generates interspecific variation in mating behavior by imposing differential constraints on the action of sexual selection, but operation of these constraints in nature is not well understood. We used field and laboratory studies to examine the importance of body size and size of sexually dimorphic appendages, the gnathopods, for pairing success in two freshwater amphipod species within the Hyalella azteca species complex. We focused on a large-bodied species found in habitats where ecological factors tend to favor large body size, and a small-bodied species in habitats where small body size is favored by size-selective predation. A field study indicated that although male pairing success was greater for larger males in both species, pairing success increased throughout the range of variation in male size in the large species, whereas, in the small species, pairing success was low for smaller individuals, but roughly constant across intermediate to larger sizes. A laboratory mate choice experiment was consistent with the field study, finding that females of the large species exhibited a preference for larger males that was independent of absolute male size, but females of the small species were indifferent when choosing between males of intermediate to larger size. Species also differed in the direction of sexual size dimorphism in the field, with males being the larger sex in the large species but the smaller sex in the small species, a pattern consistent with the species differences in mate preference. Large gnathopod size relative to body size was associated with enhanced pairing success across all body sizes for the large species, but, in the small species, large gnathopod size enhanced pairing success only in smaller males. Species differences in mating behavior appear consistent with change driven by differing forms of the interaction between sexual and natural selection.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2004        PMID: 15776289     DOI: 10.1007/s00442-004-1786-x

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Oecologia        ISSN: 0029-8549            Impact factor:   3.225


  7 in total

1.  The sexual selection continuum.

Authors:  Hanna Kokko; Robert Brooks; John M McNamara; Alasdair I Houston
Journal:  Proc Biol Sci       Date:  2002-07-07       Impact factor: 5.349

2.  Models of speciation by sexual selection on polygenic traits.

Authors:  R Lande
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  1981-06       Impact factor: 11.205

3.  ESTIMATING THE FORM OF NATURAL SELECTION ON A QUANTITATIVE TRAIT.

Authors:  Dolph Schluter
Journal:  Evolution       Date:  1988-09       Impact factor: 3.694

4.  ON THE MEASUREMENT OF NATURAL AND SEXUAL SELECTION: APPLICATIONS.

Authors:  Stevan J Arnold; Michael J Wade
Journal:  Evolution       Date:  1984-07       Impact factor: 3.694

Review 5.  Ecology, sexual selection, and the evolution of mating systems.

Authors:  S T Emlen; L W Oring
Journal:  Science       Date:  1977-07-15       Impact factor: 47.728

6.  GEOGRAPHIC VARIATION IN FEMALE PREFERENCES FOR MALE TRAITS IN POECILIA RETICULATA.

Authors:  John A Endler; Anne E Houde
Journal:  Evolution       Date:  1995-06       Impact factor: 3.694

7.  Correlated Evolution of Female Mating Preferences and Male Color Patterns in the Guppy Poecilia reticulata.

Authors:  A E Houde; J A Endler
Journal:  Science       Date:  1990-06-15       Impact factor: 47.728

  7 in total
  1 in total

1.  Infection pattern of two sympatric acanthocephalan species in the amphipod Hyalella patagonica (Amphipoda: Hyalellidae) from Lake Mascardi (Patagonia, Argentina).

Authors:  Carlos A Rauque; Liliana Semenas
Journal:  Parasitol Res       Date:  2007-01-10       Impact factor: 2.289

  1 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.