AIM: To elicit problem statements describing the consequences of vision impairment as a first step towards the development of a vision related quality of life instrument for use in India METHODS: 46 focus groups were conducted in three regions of India. Separate focus groups were held for men and women and according to disease categories: cataract (24), glaucoma (six), diabetic retinopathy or macular degeneration (10), and "mixed low vision" (six). Facilitators followed a topic guide and sessions were audio taped and transcribed. Problem statements were extracted and coded and summarised into major problem domain areas. RESULTS: Nearly 5000 problem statements, an average of 15 statements per participant, were consolidated into 18 broad domain areas. The most important problem areas accounting for over 50% of all statements were ambulation, household or occupational activities, vision symptoms, and people recognition. A further quarter of statements related to difficulties with eating and drinking, psychological concerns, self care, reading, and watching television. Problem statements were similar across the disease groups, although rankings varied. CONCLUSIONS: The functional and psychological impacts described by visually impaired participants in India are similar to those reported in other population settings although the context and impact of problems vary.
AIM: To elicit problem statements describing the consequences of vision impairment as a first step towards the development of a vision related quality of life instrument for use in India METHODS: 46 focus groups were conducted in three regions of India. Separate focus groups were held for men and women and according to disease categories: cataract (24), glaucoma (six), diabetic retinopathy or macular degeneration (10), and "mixed low vision" (six). Facilitators followed a topic guide and sessions were audio taped and transcribed. Problem statements were extracted and coded and summarised into major problem domain areas. RESULTS: Nearly 5000 problem statements, an average of 15 statements per participant, were consolidated into 18 broad domain areas. The most important problem areas accounting for over 50% of all statements were ambulation, household or occupational activities, vision symptoms, and people recognition. A further quarter of statements related to difficulties with eating and drinking, psychological concerns, self care, reading, and watching television. Problem statements were similar across the disease groups, although rankings varied. CONCLUSIONS: The functional and psychological impacts described by visually impaired participants in India are similar to those reported in other population settings although the context and impact of problems vary.
Authors: K van Dijk; S Lewallen; M Chirambo; J Gardiner; B Hoar; J Lindley; N K Wade; P Courtright Journal: Br J Ophthalmol Date: 1999-07 Impact factor: 4.638
Authors: P K Nirmalan; R D Thulasiraj; V Maneksha; R Rahmathullah; R Ramakrishnan; A Padmavathi; S R Munoz; L B Ellwein Journal: Br J Ophthalmol Date: 2002-05 Impact factor: 4.638
Authors: Chelsea L Reighard; Manju R Pillai; Sujani Shroff; George L Spaeth; Stephen G Schilling; Sheryl S Wizov; Joshua D Stein; Alan L Robin; Vidya Raja; Joshua R Ehrlich Journal: Ophthalmol Glaucoma Date: 2019-06-18
Authors: S K Gupta; K Viswanath; R D Thulasiraj; G V S Murthy; D L Lamping; S C Smith; M Donoghue; A E Fletcher Journal: Br J Ophthalmol Date: 2005-05 Impact factor: 4.638
Authors: Katherine M Niemeyer; John A Gonzales; Sivakumar R Rathinam; Manohar Babu; Radhika Thundikandy; Anuradha Kanakath; Travis C Porco; Erica N Browne; Maya M Rao; Nisha R Acharya Journal: Am J Ophthalmol Date: 2017-04-14 Impact factor: 5.258
Authors: Jennifer Rose-Nussbaumer; N Venkatesh Prajna; K Tiruvengada Krishnan; Jeena Mascarenhas; Revathi Rajaraman; Muthiah Srinivasan; Anita Raghavan; Catherine E Oldenburg; Kieran S O'Brien; Kathryn J Ray; Stephen D McLeod; Travis C Porco; Thomas M Lietman; Nisha R Acharya; Jeremy D Keenan Journal: JAMA Ophthalmol Date: 2015-06 Impact factor: 7.389
Authors: Jennifer Rose-Nussbaumer; N Venkatesh Prajna; Tiruvengada Krishnan; Jeena Mascarenhas; Revathi Rajaraman; Muthiah Srinivasan; Anita Raghavan; Catherine E Oldenburg; Kieran S O'Brien; Kathryn J Ray; Travis C Porco; Stephen D McLeod; Nisha R Acharya; Jeremy D Keenan; Thomas M Lietman Journal: Br J Ophthalmol Date: 2015-11-03 Impact factor: 4.638
Authors: Jemaima Che Hamzah; Jennifer M Burr; Craig R Ramsay; Augusto Azuara-Blanco; Maria Prior Journal: Qual Life Res Date: 2011-01-04 Impact factor: 4.147
Authors: Robert P Finger; David G Kupitz; Eva Fenwick; Bharath Balasubramaniam; Ramanathan V Ramani; Frank G Holz; Clare E Gilbert Journal: PLoS One Date: 2012-08-31 Impact factor: 3.240