Literature DB >> 15774781

Clinical characteristics of pheochromocytoma patients with germline mutations in SDHD.

Hilde Dannenberg1, Francien H van Nederveen, Mustaffa Abbou, Albert A Verhofstad, Paul Komminoth, Ronald R de Krijger, Winand N M Dinjens.   

Abstract

PURPOSE: We examined the value of SDHD mutation screening in patients presenting with apparently sporadic and familial pheochromocytoma for the identification of SDHD-related pheochromocytomas. PATIENTS AND METHODS: This retrospective study involved 126 patients with adrenal or extra-adrenal pheochromocytomas, including 24 patients with a family history of multiple endocrine neoplasia 2, von Hippel-Lindau disease, neurofibromatosis type 1, or paraganglioma (PGL). Conformation-dependent gel electrophoresis and sequence determination analysis of germline and tumor DNA were used to identify SDHD alterations. The clinical and molecular characteristics of sporadic and hereditary tumors were compared. We reviewed the literature and compared our results with those from previously published studies.
RESULTS: Pathogenic germline SDHD mutations were identified in three patients: two (2.0%) of the 102 apparently sporadic pheochromocytoma patients and one patient with a family history of PGL. These patients presented with multifocal disease (two of three multifocal patients) or with a single adrenal tumor (one of 82 patients). In the literature, mutations are mostly found in patients </= 35 years of age or presenting with multifocal or extra-adrenal disease. All patients with an SDHD mutation developed extra-adrenal tumors (pheochromocytomas or PGLs) at presentation or during follow-up.
CONCLUSION: SDHD gene mutations in patients presenting with apparently sporadic adrenal pheochromocytoma are rare. We recommend SDHD mutation screening for patients presenting with a family history of pheochromocytoma or PGL, multiple tumors, isolated adrenal or extra-adrenal pheochromocytomas, and age </= 35 years. Analysis of SDHD can also help to distinguish synchronous primary tumors from abdominal metastases.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2005        PMID: 15774781     DOI: 10.1200/JCO.2005.07.198

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Clin Oncol        ISSN: 0732-183X            Impact factor:   44.544


  7 in total

Review 1.  Pheochromocytoma and paraganglioma: understanding the complexities of the genetic background.

Authors:  Lauren Fishbein; Katherine L Nathanson
Journal:  Cancer Genet       Date:  2012 Jan-Feb

2.  Age at diagnosis of pheochromocytoma differs according to catecholamine phenotype and tumor location.

Authors:  Graeme Eisenhofer; Henri J Timmers; Jacques W M Lenders; Stefan R Bornstein; Oliver Tiebel; Massimo Mannelli; Kathryn S King; Cathy D Vocke; W Marston Linehan; Gennady Bratslavsky; Karel Pacak
Journal:  J Clin Endocrinol Metab       Date:  2010-12-08       Impact factor: 5.958

3.  Familial paragangliomas.

Authors:  Cjm Lips; Egwm Lentjes; Jwm Höppener; Rb van der Luijt; Fl Moll
Journal:  Hered Cancer Clin Pract       Date:  2006-10-15       Impact factor: 2.857

4.  Advances in biochemical screening for phaeochromocytoma using biogenic amines.

Authors:  Malcolm J Whiting; Matthew P Doogue
Journal:  Clin Biochem Rev       Date:  2009-02

Review 5.  SDH mutations in tumorigenesis and inherited endocrine tumours: lesson from the phaeochromocytoma-paraganglioma syndromes.

Authors:  B Pasini; C A Stratakis
Journal:  J Intern Med       Date:  2009-07       Impact factor: 8.989

6.  Somatic mutation analysis of the SDHB, SDHC, SDHD, and RET genes in the clinical assessment of sporadic and hereditary pheochromocytoma.

Authors:  Alexander Weber; Michael M Hoffmann; Hartmut P H Neumann; Zoran Erlic
Journal:  Horm Cancer       Date:  2012-05-10       Impact factor: 3.869

7.  Familial pheochromocytomas and paragangliomas: stories from the sign-out room.

Authors:  Aurel Perren; Paul Komminoth
Journal:  Endocr Pathol       Date:  2006       Impact factor: 4.056

  7 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.