Literature DB >> 15773789

Precautions in the use of intensity-modulated radiation therapy.

James S Welsh1, Jeffery P Limmer, Steven P Howard, David Diamond, Paul M Harari, Wolfgang Tome.   

Abstract

Intensity-modulated radiation therapy (IMRT) represents a significant technological advancement in the ability to deliver highly conformal radiation therapy. Thanks to increased availability, general clinical implementation has become progressively more common. However, there are several precautions worthy of comment regarding the clinical applications of IMRT. In theory, the increased irradiated volume and leakage radiation that occasionally accompanies IMRT could contribute to unanticipated complications and safety concerns. The protracted delivery time of IMRT with the associated increased linac monitor units can result in photoactivation of elements within the linac collimator, thereby inadvertently increasing radiation exposure to patients and staff when high-energy photons are used. The increased volumes of normal tissue exposed to lower doses of radiation through IMRT theoretically could promote carcinogenesis and complications due to the bystander effect, low-dose hyper-radiosensitivity, and diminished repair of double strand DNA breaks at very low doses. Tumor control may be adversely affected by the lower radiation dose-rates of delivery sometimes associated with IMRT as well the occasionally seen low dose "cold shoulder" on the dose-volume histograms. Unusual clinical reactions can appear as a result of the complex, unfamiliar dose-distributions occasionally generated by IMRT treatment planning. Here we discuss some of the precautions worthy of consideration when using IMRT and how these might be addressed in routine practice.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2005        PMID: 15773789     DOI: 10.1177/153303460500400209

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Technol Cancer Res Treat        ISSN: 1533-0338


  4 in total

1.  Clinical outcome in dogs with nasal tumors treated with intensity-modulated radiation therapy.

Authors:  David W Hunley; G Neal Mauldin; Keijiro Shiomitsu; Glenna E Mauldin
Journal:  Can Vet J       Date:  2010-03       Impact factor: 1.008

2.  Effect of radiotherapy techniques (IMRT vs. 3D-CRT) on outcome in patients with intermediate-risk rhabdomyosarcoma enrolled in COG D9803--a report from the Children's Oncology Group.

Authors:  Chi Lin; Sarah S Donaldson; Jane L Meza; James R Anderson; Elizabeth R Lyden; Christopher K Brown; Karen Morano; Fran Laurie; Carola A Arndt; Charles A Enke; John C Breneman
Journal:  Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys       Date:  2011-04-04       Impact factor: 7.038

3.  Impact of tumor size and location on lung dose difference between stereotactic body radiation therapy techniques for non-small cell lung cancer.

Authors:  Seong Soon Jang; Yohan Shin; Suk Young Park; Gil Ja Huh; Young Jun Yang
Journal:  Thorac Cancer       Date:  2021-10-24       Impact factor: 3.500

Review 4.  Intensity modulated radiotherapy (IMRT) in the treatment of children and adolescents--a single institution's experience and a review of the literature.

Authors:  Florian Sterzing; Eva M Stoiber; Simeon Nill; Harald Bauer; Peter Huber; Jürgen Debus; Marc W Münter
Journal:  Radiat Oncol       Date:  2009-09-23       Impact factor: 3.481

  4 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.